US Class Actions: Promise and RealityResearch funding is received from international law firm CMS, the European Justice Forum and the Swiss Reinsurance Company Limited.

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 2693-2700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Lettice ◽  
Markus Tschida ◽  
Ingo Forstenlechner

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J.G. Yonge

Purpose To provide an update and detailed explanation on the EU Regulation on Transparency of Securities Financing Transactions and of Reuse (“SFTR”). Design/methodology/approach Examines the SFTR, its key measures and requirements. Findings Concludes with a number of considerations and recommendations. For example, it advises managers of Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) and alternative investment funds (AIFs) to prepare to disclose details of their use of securities financing transactions and total return swaps. Originality/value Offers information on the SFTR and explains its requirements and scope. It has been written by a partner at an international law firm.


2021 ◽  
pp. 211-234
Author(s):  
Brad Edmondson

This chapter highlights Peter S. Paine's responsibilities and works at Cleary Gottlieb, an international law firm with offices on an upper floor of a skyscraper in downtown Manhattan. It discusses the eight Adirondack bills sent to the legislature in 1971 and the four remaining bills reintroduced to the legislature in January 1972. Paine acted as a liaison between the Adirondack Park Agency (APA), his fellow Temporary Study Commission (TSC) alumni, and state legislators to move those four bills along. The chapter outlines the importance of the bills to the TSC's vision of the Adirondacks, and emphasizes the APA's main job to draft two land use plans: the State Land Master Plan, and the Land Use and Development. It further discusses the remaining TSC bills as they moved through the legislature: the Environmental Quality Bond Act; the Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers Act; a bill that would require a constitutional amendment to diminish the park's boundaries; and a bill that expanded the size of the park by about 250,000 acres. Ultimately, the chapter assesses the APA board's struggles with town governments trying to sneak by the agency, crossed signals from Albany, and the board's biggest problem: it was split, with five APA members solidly in favor of regional zoning, one whose support was conditional, and three who were skeptical of the idea.


1924 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-842
Author(s):  
Henri Fromageot

Not only does the cutting of cables appear not to be prohibited by the rules of international law applicable to sea warfare, but such action may be considered to be implicitly justified by that right of legitimate defense which forms the basis of the rights of any belligerent nation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-142
Author(s):  
Ian Hunter

AbstractIn this article Ian Hunter considers his experiences, learning points and recommendations on running an international law firm research service from home for 6 months, after being sent home at one hour's notice. In the article he considers working from home, including the psychological benefits of having a ‘journey’ to work, providing a research service and a library service, managing a team and the use of communications technology.


ILR Review ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann P. Bartel ◽  
Brianna Cardiff-Hicks ◽  
Kathryn Shaw

The authors study an international law firm that changed its compensation plan for team leaders to address a multitasking problem: Team leaders were focusing their effort on billable hours and not spending sufficient time on leadership activities to build the firm. Compensation was changed to provide greater incentives for the leadership activities and weaker incentives for billable hours. The effect of this change on the task allocation of the firm’s team leaders was large and robust; team leaders increased their non-billable hours and shifted billable hours to team members. The firm’s new compensation plan (combining an objective formula with subjective evaluations) is the fastest-growing compensation system among law firms today.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document