scholarly journals 2G1-1 Accumulation and Visualization of Low Back Load during Working using Inertial Motion Sensors

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S416-S417
Author(s):  
Yutaka FUKUI ◽  
Tsuneo KAWANO
Author(s):  
Ibai Baglietto Araquistain ◽  
Xabier Garmendia ◽  
Manuel Graña ◽  
Javier de Lope Asiain

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Godwin ◽  
Michael Agnew ◽  
Joan Stevenson

Inertial motion sensors (IMSs) combine three sensors to produce a reportedly stable and accurate orientation estimate in three dimensions. Although accuracy has been reported within the range of 2 deg of error by manufacturers, the sensors are rarely tested in the challenging motion present in human motion. Their accuracy was tested in static, quasistatic, and dynamic situations against gold-standard Vicon camera data. It was found that static and quasistatic rms error was even less than manufacturers’ technical specifications. Quasistatic rms error was minimal at 0.3 deg (±0.15 deg SD) on the roll axis, 0.29 deg (±0.20 deg SD) on the pitch axis, and 0.73 deg (±0.81 deg SD) on the yaw axis. The dynamic rms error was between 1.9 deg and 3.5 deg on the main axes of motion but it increased considerably on off-axis during planar pendulum motion. Complex arm motion in the forward reaching plane proved to be a greater challenge for the sensors to track but results are arguably better than previously reported studies considering the large range of motion used.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsolmonbaatar Khurelbaatar ◽  
Kyungsoo Kim ◽  
SuKyoung Lee ◽  
Yoon Hyuk Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document