scholarly journals Thermodynamic Feasibility Evaluation of a Novel Lowtemperature Ejector-based Trans-critical R744 Refrigeration Cycle

Evergreen ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-212
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Purjam ◽  
Kyaw Thu ◽  
Takahiko Miyazaki
Author(s):  
Sabrina Nogueira Rabelo ◽  
Héliton Gilmar Coutinho Júnior ◽  
Flavio Vasconcelos ◽  
Yuri Ávila ◽  
João Pedro Paulino Martins ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amanda de Castro Almeida Mendes ◽  
Fabricio José Pacheco Pujatti ◽  
Márcio Cortez

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayana Soukup ◽  
Ged Murtagh ◽  
Ben W Lamb ◽  
James Green ◽  
Nick Sevdalis

Background Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are a standard cancer care policy in many countries worldwide. Despite an increase in research in a recent decade on MDTs and their care planning meetings, the implementation of MDT-driven decision-making (fidelity) remains unstudied. We report a feasibility evaluation of a novel method for assessing cancer MDT decision-making fidelity. We used an observational protocol to assess (1) the degree to which MDTs adhere to the stages of group decision-making as per the ‘Orientation-Discussion-Decision-Implementation’ framework, and (2) the degree of multidisciplinarity underpinning individual case reviews in the meetings. MethodsThis is a prospective observational study. Breast, colorectal and gynaecological cancer MDTs in the Greater London and Derbyshire (United Kingdom) areas were video recorded over 12-weekly meetings encompassing 822 case reviews. Data were coded and analysed using frequency counts.Results Eight interaction formats during case reviews were identified. case reviews were not always multi-disciplinary: only 8% of overall reviews involved all five clinical disciplines present, and 38% included four of five. The majority of case reviews (i.e. 54%) took place between two (25%) or three (29%) disciplines only. Surgeons (83%) and oncologists (8%) most consistently engaged in all stages of decision-making. While all patients put forward for MDT review were actually reviewed, a small percentage of them (4%) either bypassed the orientation (case presentation) and went straight into discussing the patient, or they did not articulate the final decision to the entire team (8%). Conclusions Assessing fidelity of MDT decision-making at the point of their weekly meetings is feasible. We found that despite being a set policy, case reviews are not entirely MDT-driven. We discuss implications in relation to the current eco-political climate, and the quality and safety of care. Our findings are in line with the current national initiatives in the UK on streamlining MDT meetings, and could help decide how to re-organise them to be most efficient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document