Clinical Audit of Obstetrical Hysterectomies for a Period of One Year in A Tertiary Care Hospital

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4 (oct 2020 - dec 2020)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzana Latif ◽  
Sadia Ilyas ◽  
Saeed Mehmood ◽  
Hammad Arif ◽  
Nuzhat Parveen Khawaja ◽  
...  

Objectives: To audit the obstetric hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital during one year. Methods: It was an observational retrospective study design, where all the pregnant women were assessed for fetomaternal outcomes, indications and complications for peripartum hysterectomy. The records were retrieved from Jan 2015 to Dec 2015 by using hospital record system. The study duration was of one year. The venue of the study was Lahore General hospital, Lahore. The exclusion criteria included all unmarried women, women with chronic kidney disease or renal failure, past surgical history of heart disease, whereas all the women who delivered in hospital, private clinic or at home after atleast 28 weeks of gestational age and experience hysterectomy at the time of delivery or after delivery in the puerperium, were included in the study. Results: The data over 32 women were retrieved from the hospital record system. The mean age of the women was 30.34+2.23 with range 26-34. The average number of parity was 3 of all females. The range of parity was 2 to 7. The average gestational age was 36.18 weeks. All the deliveries were done by cesarean section whereas 4 (12.5%) were elective and 28 (87.5%) were with emergency indications. 13 (40.6%) of the deliveries were in private clinic, 9 (28.1%) were done by LHV/ mid wife, 5(15.6%) were in private hospitals, 4(12.5%) were in LGH and only 1(3.1%) was at home. 18(56.3%) of the women were having at least one abortion in previous history. Conclusion: We concluded that emergency peripartum hysterectomy is very vital procedure that saves lives and manage life threatening obstetrical hemorrhage when other methods failed to control it.The major indications for emergency peripartum hysterectomy were placental abruption, placenta praevia/accrete, uterine atony and ruptured uterus. Key Words: Uterine artery embolization, Emergency peripartum hysterectomy, maternal morbidity and mortality, healthcare providers How to Cite: Latif F, Ilyas S, Mehmood S. Arif H. Khawaja P. Nuzhat. Jawad Z. J Clinical audit of obstetrical hysterectomies for a period of one year in a tertiary care hospital. Esculapio.2020;16(04):50-53.

Author(s):  
Jeyamani Janaki Bhaskaran ◽  
Subha Sivagami Sengodan ◽  
Aiswarya Rangesh ◽  
Praveena Murugesan

Background: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy is a lifesaving procedure done as a last resort to save mother’s life. This study is to analyse the incidence, maternal characteristics, indications and complications following peripartum hysterectomy.Methods: A retrospective analysis of emergency peripartum hysterectomy cases performed over a period of 3 years from January 2015 to December 2017.Results: During the study period, 82 emergency peripartum hysterectomies were performed giving an incidence of 3.47/1000 delivery. Most of the women belong to the age group of 21-30 years (70.7%) and the women of parity two and three (65.8%). Atonic PPH was the most common indication accounting for 59.8% of cases followed by placenta accreta (19.5%).Conclusions: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy remains a lifesaving procedure. Proper antenatal care, early referral, blood bank facilities and timely decision greatly influences maternal outcome.


2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahfuza Begum ◽  
Faisal Alsafi ◽  
Jamil ElFarra ◽  
Hani M. Tamim ◽  
Tien Le

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document