Mi caminar con Ignacio Ellacuría

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (764) ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
Jon Sobrino
Keyword(s):  

En este trabajo, Jon Sobrino comparte acerca de su vida, sus experiencias con Ignacio Ellacuría y lo impactante de su fe como legado para la presente y las futuras generaciones. La fe de Ellacuría, a juicio de Sobrino, se vio iluminada por la aparición de monseñor Romero en la turbulenta época de dictadura militar y guerra civil, por lo que es posible hablar de un proceso de conversión que partió de los estudios de teología en Innsbruck y culminó con el asesinato del P. Rutilio Grande y el encuentro, ministerio y asesinato de monseñor Romero. La fe, desde estas reflexiones, no es una realidad acabada ni una experiencia que se pueda dar por sentada, sino un esfuerzo que configura el talante y la radicalidad de la persona, para los casos que presenta este escrito, de la humanidad de Ignacio Ellacuría, monseñor Romero y del propio Jon Sobrino, y el misterio del avizoramiento del Dios liberador en medio de la oscuridad de nuestros días. Finalmente, Sobrino presenta una posible perspectiva ellacuriana para el contexto actual de la pandemia y cómo, desde el encuentro y el escrutinio de la realidad, todavía es posible abrir las puertas a la historia de la salvación desde los oprimidos. ECA Estudios Centroamericanos, Vol. 76, No. 764, 2021: 75-88.

2005 ◽  
pp. 113-118
Author(s):  
Jon Sobrino, S.I.
Keyword(s):  

Con motivo del 25 aniversario del asesinato en San Salvador de Monseñor Romero, este texto de Jon Sobrino es una interpelación –con marcado tono “profético”– a recuperar lo esencial del mensaje del obispo mártir: recuperar la opción por los pobres en un contexto todavía necesitado de los cambios que él propugnaba, manteniendo firme la esperanza, porque “ni Monseñor, ni Jesús se equivocaron”.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (105) ◽  
pp. 203-212
Author(s):  
María Clara Lucchetti Bingemer
Keyword(s):  

No hay resúmenes disponibles. Revista latinoamericana de teología, Vol. 35, No. 105, 2018: 203-212.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-415
Author(s):  
Miriam Leidinger

Abstract The term vulnerability is en vogue, both in theology and in mission studies. This contribution systematically analyses the concept and phenomenon of vulnerability and discusses its different aspects; namely materiality and embodiment, pain and suffering, and resilience and resistance. From a Christian theological point of view, these aspects of vulnerability resonate with key theological questions that lead to a closer look at the Christologies of Jürgen Moltmann, Jon Sobrino, and Graham Ward. The guiding questions are: How can we speak about the vulnerable human being in his or her relationship to Jesus Christ, the Son of God made flesh? And how is it possible vice versa to speak about the incarnated God in light of the vulnerability of all human beings? Finally, the argument culminates in a plea for a vulnerable theology in a wounded world.


2018 ◽  
pp. 49-70
Author(s):  
Joseph Drexler-Dreis

The third chapter considers how approaches to theological reflection within Latin American liberation theology might open up toward a decolonial project. It specifically focuses on how the work of the liberation theologians Ignacio Ellacuría and Jon Sobrino, unlike that of Clodovis Boff, points to the theoretical possibility of communities speaking theologically from epistemic loci located within the cracks of Western modernity. Ellacuría and Sobrino open up the methodological possibility to decolonize theological images and concepts, and in doing so, offer the possibility for theological reflection to decolonize social-historical structures. A decolonial option requires, but is also more than, a methodological shift that prioritizes the viewpoint of the poor as the starting point in theological reflection. Investigating how Ellacuría and Sobrino are able to open up the epistemic boundaries of theology is thus not an endpoint, but can provide a way forward for a decolonial theology.


1987 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-362
Author(s):  
Alan E. Lewis

Jon Sobrino has suggested that those who stand in the intellectual tradition of the Enlightenment tend to interpret suffering and disaster as ‘crises of meaning’, by which we seek to explain and accommodate alienating experiences within preconceived models of reality. Our question is how evil may be understood. But that search for meaning is a luxury denied those who can barely hold to existence itself. Theirs is a ‘crisis of reality’; and their question is less how to understand evil than how to withstand it, to overcome suffering or at least survive it. ‘The interpretative models become relevant [only] to the extent that they arise out of the experienced reality and aim at eliminating the wretched state of the real world’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document