CT dose management for neurologic events in patients with cardiac devices: Radiation exposure variation in patients with cardiac devices

Author(s):  
Gokcen Coban ◽  
◽  
Safak Parlak ◽  
Mehmet Ruhi Onur ◽  
Egemen Cifci ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Szczykutowicz ◽  
Robert Bour ◽  
Frank Ranallo ◽  
Myron Pozniak

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 194-199
Author(s):  
T. Komiyama

Japanese astronauts started staying at the International Space Station (ISS) in 2009, with each stay lasting for approximately 6 months. In total, seven Japanese astronauts have stayed at the ISS eight times. As there is no law for protection against space radiation exposure of astronauts in Japan, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) created its own rules and has applied them successfully to radiation exposure management for Japanese ISS astronauts, collaborating with ISS international partners. Regarding dose management, JAXA has implemented several dose limits to protect against both the stochastic effects of radiation and dose-dependent tissue reactions. The scope of the rules includes limiting exposure during spaceflight, exposure during several types of training, and exposure from astronaut-specific medical examinations. We, therefore, are tasked with calculating the dose from all exposure types applied to the dose limits annually for each astronaut. Whenever a Japanese astronaut is at the ISS, we monitor readings of an instrument in real-time to confirm that the exposed dose is below the set limits, as the space radiation environment can fluctuate in relation to solar activity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
G. Kalender ◽  
Milan Lisy ◽  
U. A. Stock ◽  
A. Endisch ◽  
A. Kornberger

Patients who undergo endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms (EVAR) require life-long surveillance because complications including, in particular, endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, and graft dislocation are diagnosed in a certain share of the patient population and may occur at any time after the original procedure. Radiation exposure in patients undergoing EVAR and post-EVAR surveillance has been investigated by previous authors. Arriving at realistic exposure data is essential because radiation doses resulting from CT were shown to be not irrelevant. Efforts directed at identification of factors impacting the level of radiation exposure in both the course of the EVAR procedure and post-EVAR endovascular interventions and CTAs are warranted as potentially modifiable factors may offer opportunities to reduce the radiation. In the light of the risks found to be associated with radiation exposure and considering the findings above, those involved in EVAR and post-EVAR surveillance should aim at optimal dose management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 212 (4) ◽  
pp. W111-W111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Velasco ◽  
David Torres-Cortes ◽  
Diego Aguirre
Keyword(s):  
Ct Dose ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 167 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. Suliman ◽  
H. M. Khamis ◽  
T. H. Ombada ◽  
K. Alzimami ◽  
M. Alkhorayef ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 109483
Author(s):  
Masaaki Fukunaga ◽  
Kosuke Matsubara ◽  
Shota Ichikawa ◽  
Hideki Mitsui ◽  
Hiroyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Choudhary ◽  
Bhupendra Singh Rana ◽  
Arvind Shukla ◽  
Arun Singh Oinam ◽  
Narinder Paul Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract The present work reports data of radiation exposure to the patients during head, chest, pelvis and abdomen CT examinations performed on a third-generation 16-slice CT machine. Radiation exposure was estimated using size specific dose estimates (SSDE) method, which takes into account patient’s physical dimensions in phantom measured computed tomography dose index (CTDI) value. The reported median CT dose volume index CTDIvol values in head, chest, pelvis and abdomen examinations were 26.76, 16.27, 29.81 and 14.74 mGy, respectively. The median doses evaluated using SSDE methodology for the above mentioned procedure were 54.1, 23.1, 42.8 and 20.1 mGy, respectively. Our results showed variation in dose values estimated using CTDI and SSDE methods in all examinations. The evaluated SSDE values were also compared to the values derived from data reported by the American Association of Physicist in Medicine (AAPM). SSDE values in present measurements are 4–8% lower than AAPM values. The present results show that CTDI parameters recorded on CT console should not be used to specify patient dose during CT procedures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 108900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gesa H. Poehler ◽  
Babak Alikhani ◽  
Filip Klimes ◽  
Erik F. Hauck ◽  
Kristina I. Ringe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document