Comments on "Emission factors and light absorption properties of brown carbon from household coal combustion in China" by Sun et al.,

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guofeng SHEN
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru-Jin Huang ◽  
Wei Yuan ◽  
Lu Yang ◽  
Jie Guo ◽  
Jing Duan ◽  
...  

<p>The impact of brown carbon aerosol (BrC) on the Earth’s radiative forcing balance has been widely recognized but remains uncertain, mainly because the relationships among BrC sources, chromophores, and optical properties of aerosol are poorly understood (Feng et al., 2013; Laskin et al., 2015). In this work, the light absorption properties and chromophore composition of BrC were investigated for samples collected in Xi’an, Northwest China from 2015 to 2016. Both absorption Ångström exponent and mass absorption efficiency show distinct seasonal differences, which could be attributed to the differences in sources and chromophore composition of BrC. Three groups of light-absorbing organics were found to be important BrC chromophores, including those show multiple absorption peaks at wavelength > 350 nm (12 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives) and those show single absorption peak at wavelength < 350 nm (10 nitrophenols and nitrosalicylic acids and 3 methoxyphenols). These measured BrC chromophores show distinct seasonal differences and contribute on average about 1.1% and 3.3% of light absorption of methanol-soluble BrC at 365 nm in summer and winter, respectively, about 7 and 5 times higher than the corresponding mass fractions in total organic carbon. The sources of BrC were resolved by positive matrix factorization (PMF) using these chromophores instead of commonly used non-light absorbing organic markers as model inputs. Our results show that in spring vehicular emissions and secondary formation are major sources of BrC (~70%), in fall coal combustion and vehicular emissions are major sources (~70%), in winter biomass burning and coal combustion become major sources (~80%), while in summer secondary BrC dominates (~60%).</p><p> </p><p>References:</p><p>Feng, Y., V. Ramanathan, and V. R. Kotamarthi: Brown carbon: A significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8607-8621, doi:10.5194/acp-13-8607-2013, 2013.</p><p>Laskin, A., J. Laskin, and S. A. Nizkorodov: Chemistry of atmospheric brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335-4382, doi:10.1021/cr5006167, 2015.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiju Li ◽  
Xingjun Fan ◽  
Mengbo Zhu ◽  
Chunlin Zou ◽  
Jianzhong Song ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Khairallah Atwi ◽  
Charles Perrie ◽  
Zezhen Cheng ◽  
Omar El Hajj ◽  
Rawad Saleh

The light-absorption properties of brown carbon (BrC) are often estimated using offline, solvent-extraction methods. However, recent studies have found evidence of insoluble species of BrC which are unaccounted for in...


2020 ◽  
Vol 261 ◽  
pp. 114239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Chen ◽  
Shichang Kang ◽  
Lekhendra Tripathee ◽  
Kirpa Ram ◽  
Maheswar Rupakheti ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 625 ◽  
pp. 246-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-Shu Zhu ◽  
Jun-Ji Cao ◽  
Ru-Jin Huang ◽  
Zhen-Xing Shen ◽  
Qi-Yuan Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 849-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zezhen Cheng ◽  
Khairallah M. Atwi ◽  
Zhenhong Yu ◽  
Anita Avery ◽  
Edward C. Fortner ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianzhong Sun ◽  
Guorui Zhi ◽  
Regina Hitzenberger ◽  
Yingjun Chen ◽  
Chongguo Tian ◽  
...  

Abstract. Brown carbon (BrC) draws increasing attention due to its effects on climate and other fields. In China, household coal burned for heating/cooking purposes releases huge amounts of carbonaceous particles every year; however, BrC emissions have rarely been estimated in a persuasive manner due to the unavailable emission characteristics. Here 7 coals jointly covering geological maturity from low to high were burned in 4 typical stoves at both chunk and briquette styles. The optical integrating sphere (IS) method was applied to measure the emission factors (EFs) of BrC and BC via an iterative process using the different spectral dependence of light absorption for BrC and BC. It is found that (i) the average EFs of BrC for anthracite coal chunks and briquettes are (1.08 ± 0.80) g kg−1 and (1.52 ± 0.16) g kg−1, respectively, and those for bituminous coal chunks and briquettes are (8.59 ± 2.70) g kg−1 and (4.01 ± 2.19) g kg−1, respectively, reflecting a more significant decline of BrC EFs for bituminous coals than for anthracites due to briquetting, (ii) the BrC EF peaks at the middle of coal's geological maturity, displaying a bell shaped curve between EF and volatile matter (Vdaf), (iii) the calculated BrC emissions from China's residential coal burning amounted to 592 Gg (1 Gg = 109 g) in 2013, which is nearly half of China's total BC emissions, (iv) absorption Ångström exponent (AAEs) of all coal briquettes are higher than those of coal chunks, indicating that the measure of coal briquetting increases the BrC / BC emission ratio and thus offsets some of the climate cooling effect of briquetting, and (v) in the scenario of current household coal burning in China, solar light absorption by BrC (350–850 nm in this study) accounts for more than a quarter (0.265) of the total absorption. This implies the significance of BrC to climate modeling.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Wang ◽  
Rujin Huang ◽  
Lu Yang ◽  
Wei Yuan ◽  
Yuquan Gong

<p>Atmospheric brown carbon (BrC) has significant impact on Earth’s radiative budget. However, due to our very limited knowledge about the relationship between BrC light absorption and the associated sources, the estimation for radiative effects of BrC is still largely constrained. In this study, we combine ultraviolet−visible (UV−vis) spectroscopy measurements and chemical analyses of BrC samples collected from January to December 2015 in urban Beijing, to investigated the sources of atmospheric BrC. The multiple liner regression model was applied to apportion the contributions of individual primary and secondary organic aerosol (OA) source components to light absorption of BrC. Our results indicated that biomass burning emission and secondary formation are highly absorbing up to 500 nm, and their contributions increased with the wavelengths. In contrast, the contribution of traffic emission and coal combustion to total absorption decreased with the wavelength and the large contributions were mostly found at shorter wavelengths. Then the mass absorption efficiency (MAE) of major light-absorbing components were estimated, which can provide a support to estimate the impact of BrC from these sources on the climate. The positive matrix factorization model were also used to verify the contributions of different source components of BrC absorption at 365 nm. The results consistently demonstrate that the biomass burning and secondary formation contributes significantly to the overall absorption, followed by coal combustion and traffic emission.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document