Abstract. The feedback between planetary warming and soil carbon loss has been the focus of considerable scientific attention in recent decades, due to its potential to accelerate anthropogenic climate change. The soil carbon temperature sensitivity is traditionally estimated from short-term respiration measurements – either from laboratory incubations that are artificially manipulated, or field measurements that cannot distinguish between plant and microbial respiration. To address these limitations of previous approaches, we developed a new method to estimate temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil carbon directly from warming-induced changes in soil carbon stocks measured in 36 field experiments across the world. Variations in warming magnitude and control organic carbon percentage explained much of field-warmed organic carbon percentage (R2 = 0.96), revealing Q10 across sites of 2.2, [1.6, 2.7] 95 % Confidence Interval (CI). When these field-derived Q10 values were extrapolated over the 21st century using a post-hoc correction of 20 CMIP5 Earth system model outputs, the multi-model mean soil carbon stock changes shifted from the previous value of 83 ± 156 Pg-carbon (weighted mean ± 1 SD), to 16 ± 156 Pg-carbon with a Q10 driven 95 % CI of 245 ± 194 to −99 ± 208 Pg-carbon. On average, incorporating the field-derived Q10 values into Earth system model simulations led to reductions in the projected amount of carbon sequestered in the soil over the 21st century. However, the considerable parameter uncertainty led to extremely high variability in soil carbon stock projections within each model; intra-model uncertainty driven by the measured Q10 was as great as that between model variation. This study demonstrates that data integration may not improve model certainty, but instead should strive to capture the variation of the system as well as mean trends.
Supplementary material to "Field-warmed soil carbon changes imply high 21st century modeled uncertainty"
