scholarly journals Data-mining for multi-variable flood damage modelling with limited data

Author(s):  
Dennis Wagenaar ◽  
Jurjen de Jong ◽  
Laurens M. Bouwer

Abstract. Flood damage assessment is usually done with damage curves only dependent on the water depth. Recent studies have shown that data-mining techniques applied to a multi-dimensional dataset can produce significantly better flood damage estimates. However, creating and applying a multi-variable flood damage model requires an extensive dataset, which is rarely available and this can limit the application of these new techniques. In this paper we enrich a dataset of residential building and content damages from the Meuse flood of 1993 in the Netherlands, to make it suitable for multi-variable flood damage assessment. Results from 2D flood simulations are used to add information on flow velocity, flood duration and the return period to the dataset, and cadastre data is used to add information on building characteristics. Next, several statistical approaches are used to create multi-variable flood damage models, including regression trees, bagging regression trees, random forest, and a Bayesian network. Validation on data points from a test set shows that the enriched dataset in combination with the data-mining techniques delivers a significant improvement over a simple model only based on the water depth. We find that with our dataset, the trees based methods perform better than the Bayesian Network.

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1683-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Wagenaar ◽  
Jurjen de Jong ◽  
Laurens M. Bouwer

Abstract. Flood damage assessment is usually done with damage curves only dependent on the water depth. Several recent studies have shown that supervised learning techniques applied to a multi-variable data set can produce significantly better flood damage estimates. However, creating and applying a multi-variable flood damage model requires an extensive data set, which is rarely available, and this is currently holding back the widespread application of these techniques. In this paper we enrich a data set of residential building and contents damage from the Meuse flood of 1993 in the Netherlands, to make it suitable for multi-variable flood damage assessment. Results from 2-D flood simulations are used to add information on flow velocity, flood duration and the return period to the data set, and cadastre data are used to add information on building characteristics. Next, several statistical approaches are used to create multi-variable flood damage models, including regression trees, bagging regression trees, random forest, and a Bayesian network. Validation on data points from a test set shows that the enriched data set in combination with the supervised learning techniques delivers a 20 % reduction in the mean absolute error, compared to a simple model only based on the water depth, despite several limitations of the enriched data set. We find that with our data set, the tree-based methods perform better than the Bayesian network.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Win Win Zin ◽  
Akiyuki Kawasaki ◽  
Georg Hörmann ◽  
Ralph Allen Acierto ◽  
Zin Mar Lar Tin San ◽  
...  

Flood loss models are essential tools for assessing flood risk. Flood damage assessment provides decision makers with critical information to manage flood hazards. This paper presents a multivariable flood damage assessment based on data from residential building and content damage from the Bago flood event of July 2018. This study aims to identify the influences on building and content losses. We developed a regression-based flood loss estimation model, which incorporates factors such as water depth, flood duration, building material, building age, building condition, number of stories, and floor level. Regression approaches, such as stepwise and best subset regression, were used to create the flood damage model. The selection was based on Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). We found that water depth, flood duration, and building material were the most significant factors determining flood damage in the residential sector.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Merz ◽  
H. Kreibich ◽  
U. Lall

Abstract. The usual approach for flood damage assessment consists of stage-damage functions which relate the relative or absolute damage for a certain class of objects to the inundation depth. Other characteristics of the flooding situation and of the flooded object are rarely taken into account, although flood damage is influenced by a variety of factors. We apply a group of data-mining techniques, known as tree-structured models, to flood damage assessment. A very comprehensive data set of more than 1000 records of direct building damage of private households in Germany is used. Each record contains details about a large variety of potential damage-influencing characteristics, such as hydrological and hydraulic aspects of the flooding situation, early warning and emergency measures undertaken, state of precaution of the household, building characteristics and socio-economic status of the household. Regression trees and bagging decision trees are used to select the more important damage-influencing variables and to derive multi-variate flood damage models. It is shown that these models outperform existing models, and that tree-structured models are a promising alternative to traditional damage models.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 381-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Molinari ◽  
F. Ballio ◽  
J. Handmer ◽  
S. Menoni

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Galliani ◽  
Daniela Molinari ◽  
Francesco Ballio

Abstract. INSYDE is a multi-variable, synthetic model for flood damage assessment to dwellings. The analysis and use of this model highlighted some weaknesses, linked to its complexity, that can undermine its usability and correct implementation. This study proposes a simplified version of INSYDE which maintains its multi-variable and synthetic nature, but has simpler mathematical formulations permitting an easier use and a direct analysis of the relation between damage and its explanatory variables.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 1867-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Glas ◽  
M. Jonckheere ◽  
A. Mandal ◽  
S. James-Williamson ◽  
P. De Maeyer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document