scholarly journals Inter-comparison of snow depth over sea ice from multiple methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhou ◽  
Julienne Stroeve ◽  
Shiming Xu ◽  
Alek Petty ◽  
Rachel Tilling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Significant Trend ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Snow Density ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Scales ◽  
Danish Meteorological Institute ◽  
The University

Abstract. In this study, we compare eight recently developed snow depth products that use satellite observations, modeling or a combination of satellite and modeling approaches. These products are further compared against various ground-truth observations, including those from ice mass balance buoys (IMBs), snow buoys, snow depth derived from NASA's Operation IceBridge (OIB) flights, as well as snow depth climatology from historical observations. Large snow depth discrepancies between the different snow depth data sets are observed over the Atlantic and Canadian Arctic sectors. Among the products evaluated, the University of Washington snow depth product (UW) produces the overall deepest spring (March-April) snow packs, while the snow product from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) provide the shallowest spring snow depths. There is no significant trend in the mean snow depth among all snow products since the 2000s, despite the great differences in regional snow depth. Two products, SnowModel-LG and the NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM), also provide estimates of snow density. Arctic-wide, these density products show the expected seasonal evolution with varying inter-annual variability, and no significant trend since the 2000s. The snow density in SnowModel-LG is generally higher than climatology, whereas NESOSIM density is generally lower. Both SnowModel-LG and NESOSIM densities have a larger seasonal change than climatology. Inconsistencies in the reconstructed snow parameters among the products, as well as differences between in-situ and airborne observations can in part be attributed to differences in effective footprint and spatial/temporal coverage, as well as insufficient observations for validation/bias adjustments. Our results highlight the need for more targeted Arctic surveys over different spatial and temporal scales to allow for a more systematic comparison and fusion of airborne, in-situ and remote sensing observations.

Inter-comparison of snow depth over sea ice from multiple methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhou ◽  
Julienne Stroeve ◽  
Shiming Xu
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Significant Trend ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Snow Density ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Scales ◽  
Danish Meteorological Institute ◽  
The University

<p>In this study, we compare eight recently developed snow depth products that use satellite observations, modeling or a combination of satellite and modeling approaches. These products are further compared against various ground-truth observations, including those from ice mass balance buoys (IMBs), snow buoys, snow depth derived from NASA's Operation IceBridge (OIB) flights, as well as snow depth climatology from historical observations.</p><p>Large snow depth differences between data sets are observed over the Atlantic and Canadian Arctic sectors. Among the products evaluated, the University of Washington snow depth product (UW) produces the overall deepest Spring snow packs, while the snow product from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) provide the shallowest Spring snow depths. There is no significant trend for mean snow depth among all snow products since the 2000s, however, those in regional varies larhely. Two products, SnowModel-LG and the NASA Eulerian Snow on Sea Ice Model: NESOSIM, also provide estimates of snow density. Arctic-wide, these density products show the expected seasonal evolution with varying inter-annual variability, and no significant trend since the 2000s. Compared to climatology, snow density from SnowModel-LG is generally denser, whereas that from NESOSIM is less. Both SnowModel-LG and NESOSIM densities have a larger seasonal change than climatology.</p><p>Inconsistencies in the reconstructed snow parameters among the products, as well as differences and with in-situ and airborne observations can in part be attributed to differences in effective footprint and spatial/temporal coverage, as well as insufficient observations for validation/bias adjustments. Our results highlight the need for more targeted Arctic surveys over different spatial and temporal scales to allow for a more systematic comparison and fusion of airborne, in-situ and remote sensing observations.</p>

scholarly journals Inter-comparison of snow depth over Arctic sea ice from reanalysis reconstructions and satellite retrieval

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-367
Author(s):  
Lu Zhou ◽  
Julienne Stroeve ◽  
Shiming Xu ◽  
Alek Petty ◽  
Rachel Tilling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Scales ◽  
Airborne Measurements ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
Danish Meteorological Institute

Abstract. In this study, we compare eight recently developed snow depth products over Arctic sea ice, which use satellite observations, modeling, or a combination of satellite and modeling approaches. These products are further compared against various ground-truth observations, including those from ice mass balance observations and airborne measurements. Large mean snow depth discrepancies are observed over the Atlantic and Canadian Arctic sectors. The differences between climatology and the snow products early in winter could be in part a result of the delaying in Arctic ice formation that reduces early snow accumulation, leading to shallower snowpacks at the start of the freeze-up season. These differences persist through spring despite overall more winter snow accumulation in the reanalysis-based products than in the climatologies. Among the products evaluated, the University of Washington (UW) snow depth product produces the deepest spring (March–April) snowpacks, while the snow product from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) provides the shallowest spring snow depths. Most snow products show significant correlation with snow depths retrieved from Operational IceBridge (OIB) while correlations are quite low against buoy measurements, with no correlation and very low variability from University of Bremen and DMI products. Inconsistencies in reconstructed snow depth among the products, as well as differences between these products and in situ and airborne observations, can be partially attributed to differences in effective footprint and spatial–temporal coverage, as well as insufficient observations for validation/bias adjustments. Our results highlight the need for more targeted Arctic surveys over different spatial and temporal scales to allow for a more systematic comparison and fusion of airborne, in situ and remote sensing observations.

scholarly journals The impact of snow depth, snow density and ice density on sea ice thickness retrieval from satellite radar altimetry: results from the ESA-CCI Sea Ice ECV Project Round Robin Exercise

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kern ◽  
K. Khvorostovsky ◽  
H. Skourup ◽  
E. Rinne ◽  
Z. S. Parsakhoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Snow Density ◽  
Radar Altimetry ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Satellite Radar ◽  
Satellite Radar Altimetry

Abstract. We assess different methods and input parameters, namely snow depth, snow density and ice density, used in freeboard-to-thickness conversion of Arctic sea ice. This conversion is an important part of sea ice thickness retrieval from spaceborne altimetry. A data base is created comprising sea ice freeboard derived from satellite radar altimetry between 1993 and 2012 and co-locate observations of total (sea ice + snow) and sea ice freeboard from the Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) and CryoSat Validation Experiment (CryoVEx) airborne campaigns, of sea ice draft from moored and submarine upward looking sonar (ULS), and of snow depth from OIB campaigns, Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) and the Warren climatology (Warren et al., 1999). We compare the different data sets in spatiotemporal scales where satellite radar altimetry yields meaningful results. An inter-comparison of the snow depth data sets emphasizes the limited usefulness of Warren climatology snow depth for freeboard-to-thickness conversion under current Arctic Ocean conditions reported in other studies. We test different freeboard-to-thickness and freeboard-to-draft conversion approaches. The mean observed ULS sea ice draft agrees with the mean sea ice draft derived from radar altimetry within the uncertainty bounds of the data sets involved. However, none of the approaches are able to reproduce the seasonal cycle in sea ice draft observed by moored ULS. A sensitivity analysis of the freeboard-to-thickness conversion suggests that sea ice density is as important as snow depth.

Improved Northern Hemisphere Snow Water Equivalent product from passive microwave remote sensing and in situ data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Mortimer ◽  
Lawrence Mudryk ◽  
Chris Derksen ◽  
Kari Luojus ◽  
Pinja Venalainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Water Equivalent ◽  
Microwave Remote Sensing ◽  
Passive Microwave ◽  
Snow Density ◽  
Snow Season ◽  
Snow Water ◽  
Snow Mass

<p>The European Space Agency Snow CCI+ project provides global homogenized long time series of daily snow extent and snow water equivalent (SWE). The Snow CCI SWE product is built on the Finish Meteorological Institute's GlobSnow algorithm, which combines passive microwave data with in situ snow depth information to estimate SWE. The CCI SWE product improves upon previous versions of GlobSnow through targeted changes to the spatial resolution, ancillary data, and snow density parameterization.</p><p>Previous GlobSnow SWE products used a constant snow density of 0.24 kg m<sup>-3</sup> to convert snow depth to SWE. The CCI SWE product applies spatially and temporally varying density fields, derived by krigging in situ snow density information from historical snow transects to correct biases in estimated SWE. Grid spacing was improved from 25 km to 12.5 km by applying an enhanced spatial resolution microwave brightness temperature dataset. We assess step-wise how each of these targeted changes acts to improve or worsen the product by evaluating with snow transect measurements and comparing hemispheric snow mass and trend differences.</p><p>Together, when compared to GlobSnow v3, these changes improved RMSE by ~5 cm and correlation by ~0.1 against a suite of snow transect measurements from Canada, Finland, and Russia. Although the hemispheric snow mass anomalies of CCI SWE and GlobSnow v3 are similar, there are sizeable differences in the climatological SWE, most notably a one month delay in the timing of peak SWE and lower SWE during the accumulation season. These shifts were expected because the variable snow density is lower than the former fixed value of 0.24 kg m<sup>-3</sup> early in the snow season, but then increases over the course of the snow season. We also examine intermediate products to determine the relative improvements attributable solely to the increased spatial resolution versus changes due to the snow density parameterizations. Such systematic evaluations are critical to directing future product development.</p>

scholarly journals Assessment with Controlled In-Situ Data of the Dependence of L-Band Radiometry on Sea-Ice Thickness

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 650
Author(s):  
Pablo Sánchez-Gámez ◽  
Carolina Gabarro ◽  
Antonio Turiel ◽  
Marcos Portabella
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Brightness Temperature ◽  
European Space Agency ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
L Band

The European Space Agency (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missions are providing brightness temperature measurements at 1.4 GHz (L-band) for about 10 and 4 years respectively. One of the new areas of geophysical exploitation of L-band radiometry is on thin (i.e., less than 1 m) Sea Ice Thickness (SIT), for which theoretical and empirical retrieval methods have been proposed. However, a comprehensive validation of SIT products has been hindered by the lack of suitable ground truth. The in-situ SIT datasets most commonly used for validation are affected by one important limitation: They are available mainly during late winter and spring months, when sea ice is fully developed and the thickness probability density function is wider than for autumn ice and less representative at the satellite spatial resolution. Using Upward Looking Sonar (ULS) data from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), acquired all year round, permits overcoming the mentioned limitation, thus improving the characterization of the L-band brightness temperature response to changes in thin SIT. State-of-the-art satellite SIT products and the Cumulative Freezing Degree Days (CFDD) model are verified against the ULS ground truth. The results show that the L-band SIT can be meaningfully retrieved up to 0.6 m, although the signal starts to saturate at 0.3 m. In contrast, despite the simplicity of the CFDD model, its predicted SIT values correlate very well with the ULS in-situ data during the sea ice growth season. The comparison between the CFDD SIT and the current L-band SIT products shows that both the sea ice concentration and the season are fundamental factors influencing the quality of the thickness retrieval from L-band satellites.

scholarly journals Ensemble mean density and its connection to other microphysical properties of falling snow as observed in Southern Finland

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 4825-4841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jussi Tiira ◽  
Dmitri N. Moisseev ◽  
Annakaisa von Lerber ◽  
Davide Ori ◽  
Ali Tokay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Snow Depth ◽  
The Other ◽  
Snow Density ◽  
Fall Velocity ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Ensemble Mean ◽  
Median Volume ◽  
Density Values ◽  
The University ◽  
Characteristic Mass

Abstract. In this study measurements collected during winters 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 at the University of Helsinki measurement station in Hyytiälä are used to investigate connections between ensemble mean snow density, particle fall velocity and parameters of the particle size distribution (PSD). The density of snow is derived from measurements of particle fall velocity and PSD, provided by a particle video imager, and weighing gauge measurements of precipitation rate. Validity of the retrieved density values is checked against snow depth measurements. A relation retrieved for the ensemble mean snow density and median volume diameter is in general agreement with previous studies, but it is observed to vary significantly from one winter to the other. From these observations, characteristic mass–dimensional relations of snow are retrieved. For snow rates more than 0.2 mm h−1, a correlation between the intercept parameter of normalized gamma PSD and median volume diameter was observed.

scholarly journals Freeboard, snow depth and sea-ice roughness in East Antarctica from in situ and multiple satellite data

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (57) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Markus ◽  
Robert Massom ◽  
Anthony Worby ◽  
Victoria Lytle ◽  
Nathan Kurtz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Laser Altimeter ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
Ice Roughness

AbstractIn October 2003 a campaign on board the Australian icebreaker Aurora Australis had the objective to validate standard Aqua Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) sea-ice products. Additionally, the satellite laser altimeter on the Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) was in operation. To capture the large-scale information on the sea-ice conditions necessary for satellite validation, the measurement strategy was to obtain large-scale sea-ice statistics using extensive sea-ice measurements in a Lagrangian approach. A drifting buoy array, spanning initially 50 km × 100 km, was surveyed during the campaign. In situ measurements consisted of 12 transects, 50–500 m, with detailed snow and ice measurements as well as random snow depth sampling of floes within the buoy array using helicopters. In order to increase the amount of coincident in situ and satellite data an approach has been developed to extrapolate measurements in time and in space. Assuming no change in snow depth and freeboard occurred during the period of the campaign on the floes surveyed, we use buoy ice-drift information as well as daily estimates of thin-ice fraction and rough-ice vs smooth-ice fractions from AMSR-E and QuikSCAT, respectively, to estimate kilometer-scale snow depth and freeboard for other days. the results show that ICESat freeboard estimates have a mean difference of 1.8 cm when compared with the in situ data and a correlation coefficient of 0.6. Furthermore, incorporating ICESat roughness information into the AMSR-E snow depth algorithm significantly improves snow depth retrievals. Snow depth retrievals using a combination of AMSR-E and ICESat data agree with in situ data with a mean difference of 2.3 cm and a correlation coefficient of 0.84 with a negligible bias.

scholarly journals Snow depth uncertainty and its implications on satellite derived Antarctic sea ice thickness

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Price ◽  
Iman Soltanzadeh ◽  
Wolfgang Rack
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Snow Accumulation ◽  
In Situ Measurements ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Growth Season ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Antarctic Sea Ice ◽  
Fast Ice

Abstract. Knowledge of the snow depth distribution on Antarctic sea ice is poor but is critical to obtaining sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry measurements of freeboard. We examine the usefulness of various snow products to provide snow depth information over Antarctic fast ice with a focus on a novel approach using a high-resolution numerical snow accumulation model (SnowModel). We compare this model to results from ECMWF ERA-Interim precipitation, EOS Aqua AMSR-E passive microwave snow depths and in situ measurements at the end of the sea ice growth season. The fast ice was segmented into three areas by fastening date and the onset of snow accumulation was calibrated to these dates. SnowModel falls within 0.02 m snow water equivalent (swe) of in situ measurements across the entire study area, but exhibits deviations of 0.05 m swe from these measurements in the east where large topographic features appear to have caused a positive bias in snow depth. AMSR-E provides swe values half that of SnowModel for the majority of the sea ice growth season. The coarser resolution ERA-Interim, not segmented for sea ice freeze up area reveals a mean swe value 0.01 m higher than in situ measurements. These various snow datasets and in situ information are used to infer sea ice thickness in combination with CryoSat-2 (CS-2) freeboard data. CS-2 is capable of capturing the seasonal trend of sea ice freeboard growth but thickness results are highly dependent on the assumptions involved in separating snow and ice freeboard. With various assumptions about the radar penetration into the snow cover, the sea ice thickness estimates vary by up to 2 m. However, we find the best agreement between CS-2 derived and in situ thickness when a radar penetration of 0.05-0.10 m into the snow cover is assumed.

scholarly journals Advances in altimetric snow depth estimates using bi-frequency SARAL/CryoSat-2 Ka/Ku measurements

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Garnier ◽  
Sara Fleury ◽  
Gilles Garric ◽  
Jérôme Bouffard ◽  
Michel Tsamados ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Ocean Modeling ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
Band Frequency ◽  
In Situ Data ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Assimilation System

Abstract. Although snow depth on sea ice is a key parameter for Sea Ice Thickness (SIT), there currently does not exist reliable estimations. In Arctic, nearly all SIT products use a snow depth climatology (the Warren-99 modified climatology, W99m) constructed from in-situ data obtained prior to the first significant impacts of climate change. In Antarctica, the lack of information on snow depth remains a major obstacle in the development of reliable SIT products. In this study, we present the latest version of the Altimetric Snow Depth (ASD) product computed over both hemispheres from the difference of the radar penetration into the snow pack between the CryoSat-2 Ku-band and the SARAL Ka-band frequency radars. The ASD solution is compared against a wide range of snow depth products including model data (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) or its equivalent in Antarctica the Global Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (GIOMAS), the MERCATOR model and NASA's Eulerian Snow On Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM, only in Arctic)), the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR-2) passive radiometer data, and the Dual-altimeter Snow Thickness (DuST) Ka-Ku product (only in Arctic). It is validated in the Arctic against in-situ and airborne validation data. These comparisons demonstrate that ASD provide a consistent snow depth solution, with space and time patterns comparable with those of the alternative Ka-Ku DuST product, but with a mean bias of about 6.5 cm. We also demonstrate that ASD is consistent with the validation data. Comparisons with Operation Ice Bridge's (OIB) airborne snow radar in Arctic during the period of 2014–2018 show a correlation of 0.66 and a RMSE of about 6 cm. Furthermore, a first-guess monthly climatology has been constructed in Arctic from the ASD product, which shows a good agreement with OIB during 2009–2012. This climatology is shown to provide a better solution than the W99m climatology when compared with validation data. Finally, we have characterised the SIT uncertainty due to the snow depth from an ensemble of SIT solutions computed for the Arctic by using the different snow depth products previously used in the comparison with the ASD product. During the period of 2013–2019, we found a spatially averaged SIT mean standard deviation of 20 cm. Deviations between SIT estimations due to different snow depths can reach up to 77 cm. Using the ASD data instead of W99m to estimate SIT over this time period leads to a reduction of the average SIT of about 30 cm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document