scholarly journals Early effect of validation efforts of Massachusetts syndromic surveillance data

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bova ◽  
Roas Ergas
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Production Environment ◽  
Diagnosis Code ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Validation Strategy

ObjectiveTo develop a detailed data validation strategy for facilitiessending emergency department data to the Massachusetts SyndromicSurveillance program and to evaluate the validation strategy bycomparing data quality metrics before and after implementation ofthe strategy.IntroductionAs a participant in the National Syndromic Surveillance Program(NSSP), the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH)has worked closely with our statewide Health Information Exchange(HIE) and National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP)technical staff to collect and transmit emergency department (ED)data from eligible hospitals (EHs) to the NSSP. Our goal is to ensurecomplete and accurate data using a multi-step process beginning withpre-production data and continuing after EHs are sending live datato production.MethodsWe used an iterative process to establish a framework formonitoring data quality during onboarding of EHs into our syndromicsurveillance system and kept notes of the process.To evaluate the framework, we compared data received duringthe month of January 2016 to the most recent full month of data(June 2016) to describe the following primary data quality metricsand their change over time: total and daily average of message andvisit volume; percent of visits with a chief complaint or diagnosiscode received in the NSSP dataset; and percentage of visits with achief complaint/diagnosis code received within a specified time ofadmission to the ED.ResultsThe strategies for validation we found effective includedexamination of pre-production test HL7 messages and the executionof R scripts for validation of live data in the staging and productionenvironments. Both the staging and production validations areperformed at the individual message level as well as the aggregatedvisit level, and included measures of completeness for requiredfields (Chief Complaint, Diagnosis Codes, Discharge Dispositions),timeliness, examples of text fields (Chief Complaint and TriageNotes), and demographic information. We required EHs to passvalidation in the staging environment before granting access to senddata to the production environment.From January to June 2016, the number of EHs sending data tothe production environment increased from 44 to 48, and the numberof messages and visits captured in the production environmentincreased substantially (see Table 1). The percentage of visits witha chief complaint remained consistently high (>99%); howeverthe percentage of visits with a chief complaint within three hoursof admission decreased during the study period. Both the overallpercentage of visits with a diagnosis code and the percentage of visitswith a diagnosis code within 24 hours of admission increased.ConclusionsFrom January to June 2016, Massachusetts syndromic surveillancedata improved in the percentage of visits with diagnosis codes and thetime from admission to first diagnosis code. This was achieved whilethe volume of data coming into the system increased. The timelinessof chief complaints decreased slightly during the study period, whichmay be due to the inclusion of several new facilities that are unable tosend real-time data. Even with the improvements in the timeliness ofthe diagnosis code field, and the subsequent decrease in the timelinessof the chief complaint field, chief complaints remained a more timelyoption for syndromic surveillance. Pre-production and ongoing dataquality assurance activities are crucial to ensure meaningful dataare acquired for secondary analyses. We found that reviewing testHL7 messages and staging data, daily monitoring of productiondata for key factors such as message volume and percent of visitswith a diagnosis code, and monthly full validation in the productionenvironment were and will continue to be essential to ensure ongoingdata integrity.Table 1: ED Data in the Production Environment

scholarly journals Free-Text Mining to Improve Syndrome Definition Matching Across Emergency Departments

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Arkin
Keyword(s):  
Text Mining ◽  
Influenza Season ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Diagnosis Code ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Group A ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Group B

ObjectiveWe sought to use free text mining tools to improve emergency department (ED) chief complaint and discharge diagnosis data syndrome definition matching across facilities with differing robustness of data in the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics (ESSENCE) application in Idaho’s syndromic surveillance system.IntroductionStandard syndrome definitions for ED visits in ESSENCE rely on chief complaints. Visits with more words in the chief complaint field are more likely to match syndrome definitions. While using ESSENCE, we observed geographic differences in chief complaint length, apparently related to differences in electronic health record (EHR) systems, which resulted in disparate syndrome matching across Idaho regions. We hypothesized that chief complaint and diagnosis code co-occurrence among ED visits to facilities with long chief complaints could help identify terms that would improve syndrome match among facilities with short chief complaints.MethodsThe ESSENCE-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) chief complaint syndrome was used as the base syndrome for this analysis. Syndrome-matched visits were defined as visits that match the syndrome definition.We assessed chief complaints and diagnosis code co-occurrence of syndrome-matched visits using the RCRAN TidyText package and developed a bigram network from normalized, concatenated chief complaint and diagnosis code (CCDD) fields and normalized diagnosis code (DD) fields per previously described methodologies.1 Common connections were defined by a natural break in frequency of pair occurrence for CCDD pairs (30 occurrences) and DD pairs (5 occurrences).The ESSENCE syndrome was revised by adding relevant bigram network clusters and logic operators. We compared time series of the percent of ED visits matched to the ESSENCE syndrome with those matched to the revised syndrome. We stratified the time series by facilities grouped by short (average < 4 words, “Group A”) and long (average ≥ 4 words, “Group B”) chief complaint fields (Figure 1). Influenza season start was defined as two consecutive weeks above baseline, or the 95% upper confidence limit of percent syndrome-matched visits outside of the CDC ILI surveillance season. Season trends and influenza-related deaths in Idaho residents were compared.ResultsDuring August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2017, 1,587 (1.17%) of 135,789 ED visits matched the ESSENCE syndrome. Bigram networks of CCDD fields produced clusters already included by the ESSENCE syndrome. The bigram network of DD fields (Figure 2) produced six clusters. The revised syndrome definition included the ESSENCE syndrome, 3 single DD terms, and 3 two DD terms combined. The start of influenza season was identified as the same week for both ILI syndrome definitions (ESSENCE baseline 0.70%; revised baseline 2.21%). The ESSENCE syndrome indicated the season peaked during Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) week 2017-05 with the season ending MMWR week 2017-14. The revised syndrome indicated 2017-20 as the season end. Multiple peaks seen with the revised syndrome during MMWR weeks 2017-02, 2017-05, and 2017-10 mirrored peaks in influenza-related deaths during MMWR weeks 2017-03, 2017-06, and 2017-11.ILI season onset was five weeks earlier with the revised syndrome compared with the ESSENCE syndrome in Group A facilities, but remained the same in Group B. The annual percentage of ED visits related to ILI was more uniform between facility groups under the revised syndrome than the ESSENCE syndrome. Unlike the trend seen with the ESSENCE syndrome, the revised syndrome shows low-level ILI activity in both groups year-round.ConclusionsIn Idaho, dramatic differences in ED visit chief complaint word counts were seen between facilities; bigram networks were found to be an important tool to identify diagnosis codes and logical operators that built more inclusive syndrome definitions when added to an existing chief complaint syndrome. Bigram networks may aid understanding the relationship between chief complaints and diagnosis codes in syndrome-matched visits.Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.References1. Silge, J., Robinson, D. (2017). “Text Mining with R”. O’Reilly.

scholarly journals Syndromic Surveillance for Situation Awareness: Understanding Syndrome Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Arkin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Situation Awareness ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Word Count ◽  
Data Submission ◽  
Daily Frequency ◽  
Ed Visits

ObjectiveIn August 2017, a large influx of visitors was expected to view the total solar eclipse in Idaho. The Idaho Syndromic Surveillance program planned to enhance situation awareness during the event. In preparation, we sought to examine syndrome performance of several newly developed chief complaint and combination chief complaint and diagnosis code syndrome definitions to aid in interpretation of syndromic surveillance data during the event.IntroductionThe August 21, 2017 total solar eclipse in Idaho was anticipated to lead to a large influx of visitors in many communities, prompting a widespread effort to assure Idaho was prepared. To support these efforts, the Idaho Syndromic Surveillance program (ISSp) developed a plan to enhance situation awareness during the event by conducting syndromic surveillance using emergency department (ED) visit data contributed to the National Syndromic Surveillance Program’s BioSense platform by Idaho hospitals. ISSp sought input on anticipated threats from state and local emergency management and public health partners, and selected 8 syndromes for surveillance.Ideally, the first electronic message containing information on an emergency department visit is sent to ISSp within 24 hours of the visit and includes the chief complaint for the visit. Data on other variables, such as diagnosis codes, are updated by subsequent messages for several days after the visit. Chief complaint (CC) text and discharge diagnosis (DD) codes are the primary variables used for syndrome match; delay in reporting these variables adversely affects timely syndrome match of visits. Because our plan included development of new syndrome definitions and querying data within 24 hours of visits, earlier than ISSp had done previously for trend analysis, we sought to better understand syndrome performance.MethodsWe defined messages with completed CC and DD as the last message regarding a visit where term count increased from previous messages regarding that visit, indicating new information was added to the field. We retrospectively assessed the total number of ED visits and calculated the daily frequency of completed CC and DD by days since visit date for visits during June 1–July 31, 2017. Additionally, we calculated facility mean word count in CC fields by averaging the word count of parsed, complete CC fields for visits occurring June 1–July 31, 2017 for each facility.During July 10–24, 2017, we calculated the daily frequency of visits occurring in the previous 90 days for total ED visits and syndrome-matched visits for 8 selected syndromes (heat-related illness; cold exposure; influenza-like-illness; nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; animal/bug bites and stings; drowning/submersion; alcohol/drug intoxication; and medication replacement). Syndrome-matched visits were defined as visits with CC or DD that match the syndrome definition. We calculated the percent of syndrome-matched visits by syndromes defined with CC or CC and DD combined (CCDD) over time. Syndromes with fewer than 5 matched visits were excluded from analysis.ResultsComplete CCs were received for 99.1% of visits and complete DDs were received for 89.8% of visits. Complete CCs were submitted for 58.2% of visits within 1 day of the visit, 88.9% of visits within 3 days, and 98.9% of visits within 7 days. In contrast, complete DDs were submitted for 24.3% of visits within 1 day, 38.7% of visits within 3 days, and 53.7% of visits within 7 days (Table 1).During the observation period, data submission from facilities representing approximately 33% of visits was interrupted for 5 (36%) of 14 days. Heat-related illness, cold exposure, and drowning/submersion, were excluded from syndrome-match analysis. During the 9 days of uninterrupted data submission, 100% syndrome-matched visits for syndromes defined by CC alone and 69.1% syndrome-matched visits for syndromes defined by CCDD were identified within 6–7 days of initial visit. Facilities with interrupted data submission contributed 75% of CC syndrome-matched visits and 33% of CCDD syndrome-matched visits. The facility mean word count in CC fields from these facilities was >15 compared with 2–4 from other facilities.ConclusionsExamination of syndrome performance prior to a known event quantitated differences in timeliness of CC and DD completeness and syndrome match. CCs and DDs in visit messages were not complete within 24 hours of initial visit. CC completion was nearly 34 percentage points greater than DD completeness 1 day after initial visit and did not converge until ≥15 days after initial visit. Higher percentages of syndrome match within 6–7 days of initial visit were seen by CC alone than CCDD defined syndromes. Facilities using longer CCs contributed disproportionately to syndrome matching using CC, but not CCDD syndrome definitions. Syndromic surveillance system characteristics, including timeliness of CCs and DDs, length of CCs, and characteristics of facilities from which data transmission is interrupted should be considered when building syndrome definitions that will be used for surveillance within 7 days of emergency department visits and when interpreting syndromic surveillance findings.

scholarly journals Using Real-Time Syndromic Surveillance to Analyze the Impact of a Cold Weather Event in New Mexico

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Victoria F. Dirmyer
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Cold Weather ◽  
Weather Event ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Objective. This report describes the development of a novel syndromic cold weather syndrome for use in monitoring the impact of cold weather events on emergency department attendance. Methods. Syndromic messages from seven hospitals were analyzed for ED visits that occurred over a 12-day period. A cold weather syndrome was defined using terms in the self-reported chief complaint field as well as specific ICD-10-CM codes related to cold weather. A κ statistic was calculated to assess the overall agreement between the chief complaint field and diagnosis fields to further refine the cold weather syndrome definition. Results. Of the 3,873 ED visits that were reported, 487 were related to the cold weather event. Sixty-three percent were identified by a combination of diagnosis codes and chief complaints. Overall agreement between chief complaint and diagnosis codes was moderate (κ=0.50; 95% confidence interval = 0.48–0.52). Conclusion. Due to the near real-time reporting of syndromic surveillance data, analysis results can be acted upon. Results from this analysis will be used in the state’s emergency operations plan (EOP) for cold weather and winter storms. The EOP will provide guidance for mobilization of supplies/personnel, preparation of roadways and pedestrian walkways, and the coordination efforts of multiple state agencies.

scholarly journals Data Quality Improvements in National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP) Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Girum S. Ejigu ◽  
Kakshmi Radhakrishnan ◽  
Paul McMurray ◽  
Roseanne English
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Data Flow ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Discharge Diagnosis ◽  
Standard Data ◽  
Quality Checks ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Data Elements

ObjectiveReview the impact of applying regular data quality checks to assess completeness of core data elements that support syndromic surveillance.IntroductionThe National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP) is a community focused collaboration among federal, state, and local public health agencies and partners for timely exchange of syndromic data. These data, captured in nearly real time, are intended to improve the nation's situational awareness and responsiveness to hazardous events and disease outbreaks. During CDC’s previous implementation of a syndromic surveillance system (BioSense 2), there was a reported lack of transparency and sharing of information on the data processing applied to data feeds, encumbering the identification and resolution of data quality issues. The BioSense Governance Group Data Quality Workgroup paved the way to rethink surveillance data flow and quality. Their work and collaboration with state and local partners led to NSSP redesigning the program’s data flow. The new data flow provided a ripe opportunity for NSSP analysts to study the data landscape (e.g., capturing of HL7 messages and core data elements), assess end-to-end data flow, and make adjustments to ensure all data being reported were processed, stored, and made accessible to the user community. In addition, NSSP extensively documented the new data flow, providing the transparency the community needed to better understand the disposition of facility data. Even with a new and improved data flow, data quality issues that were issues in the past, but went unreported, remained issues in the new data. However, these issues were now identified. The newly designed data flow provided opportunities to report and act on issues found in the data unlike previous versions. Therefore, an important component of the NSSP data flow was the implementation of regularly scheduled standard data quality checks, and release of standard data quality reports summarizing data quality findings.MethodsNSSP data was assessed for the national-level completeness of chief complaint and discharge diagnosis data. Completeness is the rate of non- null values (Batini et al., 2009). It was defined as the percent of visits (e.g., emergency department, urgent care center) with a non-null value found among the one or more records associated with the visit. National completeness rates for visits in 2016 were compared with completeness rates of visits in 2017 (a partial year including visits through August 2017). In addition, facility-level progress was quantified after scoring each facility based on the percent completeness change between 2016 and 2017. Legacy data processed prior to introducing the new NSSP data flow were not included in this assessment.ResultsNationally, the percent completeness of chief complaint for visits in 2016 was 82.06% (N=58,192,721), and the percent completeness of chief complaint for visits in 2017 was 87.15% (N=80,603,991). Of the 2,646 facilities that sent visits data in 2016 and 2017, 114 (4.31%) facilities showed an increase of at least 10% in chief complaint completeness in 2017 compared with 2016. As for discharge diagnosis, national results showed the percent completeness of discharge diagnosis for 2016 visits was 50.83% (N=36,048,334), and the percent completeness of discharge diagnosis for 2017 was 59.23% (N=54,776,310). Of the 2,646 facilities that sent data for visits in 2016 and 2017, 306 (11.56%) facilities showed more than a 10% increase in percent completeness of discharge diagnosis in 2017 compared with 2016.ConclusionsNationally, the percent completeness of chief complaint for visits in 2016 was 82.06% (N=58,192,721), and the percent completeness of chief complaint for visits in 2017 was 87.15% (N=80,603,991). Of the 2,646 facilities that sent visits data in 2016 and 2017, 114 (4.31%) facilities showed an increase of at least 10% in chief complaint completeness in 2017 compared with 2016. As for discharge diagnosis, national results showed the percent completeness of discharge diagnosis for 2016 visits was 50.83% (N=36,048,334), and the percent completeness of discharge diagnosis for 2017 was 59.23% (N=54,776,310). Of the 2,646 facilities that sent data for visits in 2016 and 2017, 306 (11.56%) facilities showed more than a 10% increase in percent completeness of discharge diagnosis in 2017 compared with 2016.ReferencesBatini, C., Cappiello. C., Francalanci, C. and Maurino, A. (2009) Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput. Surv., 41(3). 1-52.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Novel Syndromic Surveillance Query for Heat-Related Illness Using Hospital Data From Maricopa County, Arizona, 2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 31S-39S ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. White ◽  
Vjollca Berisha ◽  
Kathryn Lane ◽  
Henri Ménager ◽  
Aaron Gettel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Maricopa County ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Illness Prevention ◽  
Council Of State

Objectives: We evaluated a novel syndromic surveillance query, developed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) Heat Syndrome Workgroup, for identifying heat-related illness cases in near real time, using emergency department and inpatient hospital data from Maricopa County, Arizona, in 2015. Methods: The Maricopa County Department of Public Health applied 2 queries for heat-related illness to area hospital data transmitted to the National Syndromic Surveillance Program BioSense Platform: the BioSense “heat, excessive” query and the novel CSTE query. We reviewed the line lists generated by each query and used the diagnosis code and chief complaint text fields to find probable cases of heat-related illness. For each query, we calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) for heat-related illness. Results: The CSTE query identified 674 records, of which 591 were categorized as probable heat-related illness, demonstrating a PPV of 88% for heat-related illness. The BioSense query identified 791 patient records, of which 589 were probable heat-related illness, demonstrating a PPV of 74% for heat-related illness. The PPV was substantially higher for the CSTE novel and BioSense queries during the heat season (May 1 to September 30; 92% and 85%, respectively) than during the cooler seasons (55% and 29%, respectively). Conclusion: A novel query for heat-related illness that combined diagnosis codes, chief complaint text terms, and exclusion criteria had a high PPV for heat-related illness, particularly during the heat season. Public health departments can use this query to meet local needs; however, use of this novel query to substantially improve public health heat-related illness prevention remains to be seen.

scholarly journals Tracking drug-related overdoses at the local level: Using Syndromic Surveillance in the CO-NCR

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emery Shekiro ◽  
Lily Sussman ◽  
Talia Brown
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Drug Overdose ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Case Definition ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Discharge Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Drug Overdoses

Objective: In order to better describe local drug-related overdoses, we developed a novel syndromic case definition using discharge diagnosis codes from emergency department data in the Colorado North Central Region (CO-NCR). Secondarily, we used free text fields to understand the use of unspecified diagnosis fields.Introduction: The United States is in the midst of a drug crisis; drug-related overdoses are the leading cause of unintentional death in the country. In Colorado the rate of fatal drug overdose increased 68% from 2002-2014 (9.7 deaths per 100,000 to 16.3 per 100,000, respectively)1, and non-fatal overdose also increased during this time period (23% increase in emergency department visits since 2011)2. The CDC’s National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP) provides near-real time monitoring of emergency department (ED) events across the country, with information uploaded daily on patient demographics, chief complaint for visit, diagnosis codes, triage notes, and more. Colorado North Central Region (CO-NCR) receives data for 4 local public health agencies from 25 hospitals across Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Denver, Douglas, and Jefferson Counties.Access to local syndromic data in near-real time provides valuable information for local public health program planning, policy, and evaluation efforts. However, use of these data also comes with many challenges. For example, we learned from key informant interviews with ED staff in Boulder and Denver counties, about concern with the accuracy and specificity of drug-related diagnosis codes, specifically for opioid-related overdoses.Methods: Boulder County Public Health (BCPH) and Denver Public Health (DPH) developed a query in Early Notification of Community Based Epidemics (ESSENCE) using ICD-10-CM codes to identify cases of drug-related overdose [T36-T51] from October 2016 to September 2017. The Case definition included unintentional, self-harm, assault and undetermined poisonings, but did not include cases coded as adverse effects or underdosing of medication. Cases identified in the query were stratified by demographic factors (i.e., gender and age) and substance used in poisoning. The first diagnosis code in the file was considered the primary diagnosis. Chief complaint and triage note fields were examined to further describe unspecified cases and to describe how patients present to emergency departments in the CO-NCR. We also explored whether detection of drug overdose visits captured by discharge diagnosis data varied by patient sex, age, or county.Results: The query identified 2,366 drug-related overdoses in the CO-NCR. The prevalence of drug overdoses differed across age groups. The detection of drug overdoses was highest among our youth and young adult populations; 16 to 20 year olds (16.0%), 21-25 year olds (11.4%), 26-30 year olds (11.4%). Females comprised 56.1% of probable general drug overdoses. The majority of primary diagnoses (31.0%) included poisonings related to diuretics and other unspecified drugs (T50), narcotics (T40) (12.6%), or non-opioid analgesics (T39) (7.8%). For some cases with unspecified drug overdose codes there was additional information about drugs used and narcan administration found in the triage notes and chief complaint fields.Conclusions: Syndromic surveillance offers the opportunity to capture drug-related overdose data in near-real time. We found variation in drug-related overdose by demographic groups. Unspecified drug overdose codes are extremely common, which likely negatively impacts the quality of drug-specific surveillance. Leveraging chief complaint and triage notes could improve our understanding of factors involved in drug-related overdose with limitations in discharge diagnosis. Chart reviews and access to more fields from the ED electronic health record could improve local drug surveillance.

scholarly journals Creation of a Kansas Spring Extreme Weather Syndrome Definition and Unique Records

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary M. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health Effects ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Situational Awareness ◽  
Extreme Weather ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Ed Visits

ObjectiveTo evaluate syndrome definitions capturing storm- and extremeweather-related emergency department visits in Kansas hospitalsparticipating in the National Syndromic Surveillance Program(NSSP).IntroductionKansas storms can occur without warning and have potential tocause a multitude of health issues. Extreme weather preparednessand event monitoring for public health effects is being developedas a function of syndromic surveillance at the Kansas Departmentof Health and Environment (KDHE). The Syndromic SurveillanceProgram at KDHE utilized emergency department (ED) data to detectdirect health effects of the weather events in the first 9 months of2016. Current results show injuries directly related to the storms andalso some unexpected health effects that warrant further exploration.MethodsA basic syndrome definition was defined based on extreme springand summer weather events experienced in Kansas. This broaddefinition pulled records from Kansas EDs that included the followingin the Chief Complaint or Triage Notes fields:●Storm●Rain●Torna(dos)●Wind●FloodThis broad syndrome definition was performed on data submittedto the Kansas’s production server through NSSP between January 1stand August 30th, 2016. After the initial pull, duplicate records for thesame patient and visit were removed.The remaining set was then searched by hand to identify termscaught by the syndrome definition that were not related to stormactivity or extreme weather. Record chief complaints were thenscanned by hand to identify common words containing the searchcriteria and then removed. Keywords not of interest to the syndromedefinition that were caught were: migraine, window, drain, restrain,train, and many other proper nouns that contained one of the keywords.These remaining visits were then sorted by nature of visit andunexpected records were recorded for future direction of syndromedefinition development.ResultsThe initial data pull under these conditions yielded 17,691 uniqueemergency department visits from January 1stto August 30thduringthe 2016 year. From this, records were classified based on key wordsresulting in the pull. The table below shows the initial pull results, theremaining records after errant results were expunged, the percentageof visits that were removed, and the most common reason for removal.Of these records remaining after cleaning, 20 were related tostorms, 62 were related to rain, 7 were related to tornado activity,66 were related to wind, and 14 were related to flooding along withthe mixed variable instances shown in the table. A majority of thewind-related ED visits were injuries and the majority of the tornadoactivity events were related to injuries sustained while taking shelter.Many of the injuries mentioning storms were sustained in preparationfor the storm, and a handful were due to mental stresses regardingstorm activity.ConclusionsSyndrome definition development is an iterative process thatwill vary by region. By manually looking at line-level data details,future searches can better accommodate these errant results and falsepositives. These studies will facilitate more rapid extreme weatherresponse in Kansas and allow better situational awareness. Alongwith general storm-related injuries, knowledge of the unusual recordscaught by a syndrome definition can also help direct public educationin preparation of future storms. With injuries sustained while takingshelter and injuries sustained in preparation for the storm, we can takethese unique ED visits and work on interventions to prevent futureoccurrences.

scholarly journals Monitoring Out-of-State Patients during a 2017 Hurricane Response using ESSENCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb Wiedeman ◽  
Julie Shaffner ◽  
Kelly Squires ◽  
Jeffrey Leegon ◽  
Rendi Murphree ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Situational Awareness ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Major Hurricane ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Zip Code ◽  
Hurricane Irma

ObjectiveTo demonstrate the use of ESSENCE in the BioSense Platform to monitor out-of-State patients seeking emergency healthcare in Tennessee during Hurricanes Harvey and Irma.IntroductionSyndromic surveillance is the monitoring of symptom combinations (i.e., syndromes) or other indicators within a population to inform public health actions. The Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) collects emergency department (ED) data from more than 70 hospitals across Tennessee to support statewide syndromic surveillance activities. Hospitals in Tennessee typically provide data within 48 hours of a patient encounter. While syndromic surveillance often supplements disease- or condition-specific surveillance, it can also provide general situational awareness about emergency department patients during an event or response.During Hurricanes Harvey (continental US landfall on August 25, 2017) and Irma (continental US landfall on September 10, 2017), TDH supported all hazards situational awareness using the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics (ESSENCE) in the BioSense Platform supported by the National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP). The volume of out-of-state patients in Tennessee was monitored to assess the impact on the healthcare system and any geographic- or hospital-specific clustering of out-of-state patients within Tennessee. Results were included in daily State Health Operations Center (SHOC) situation reports and shared with agency response partners such as the Tennessee Emergency Management Agency (TEMA).MethodsData were monitored from August 18, 2017 through September 24, 2017. A simple query was established in ESSENCE using the Patient Location (Full Details) dataset. Data were limited to hospital ED visits reported by Tennessee (Site = “Tennessee”). To monitor ED visits among residents of Texas before, during, and after Major Hurricane Harvey, data were queried for a patient zip code within Texas (State = “Texas”). ED visits among Florida residents were monitored similarly (State = “Florida”) before, during, and after Major Hurricane Irma. Additionally, a free text chief complaint search was implemented for the terms “Harvey”, “Irma, “hurricane”, “evacuee”, “evacuate”, “Florida”, and “Texas”. Chief complaint search results were then filtered to remove encounters with patient zip codes within Tennessee.ResultsFrom August 18, 2017 through September 24, 2017, Tennessee hospital EDs reported 277 patient encounters among Texas residents and 1,041 patient encounters among Florida residents. The number of encounters among patients from Texas remained stable throughout the monitoring period. In contrast, the number of encounters among patients from Florida exceeded the expected value on September 7, peaked September 10 at 116 patient encounters, and returned to expected levels on September 16 (Figure 1). The increase in patients from Florida was evenly distributed across most of Tennessee, with some clustering around a popular tourism area in East Tennessee. No concerning trends in reported syndromes or chief complaints were identified among Texas or Florida patients.The free text chief complaint query first exceeded the expected value on September 9, peaked on September 11 with 5 patient encounters, and returned to expected levels on September 14. From August 18 through September 24, 21 of 30 visits captured by the query were among Florida residents. One Tennessee hospital appeared to be intentionally using the term “Irma” in their chief complaint field to indicate patients from Florida impacted by the hurricane.ConclusionsThe ESSENCE instance in the BioSense platform provided TDH the opportunity to easily locate and monitor out-of-state patients seen in Tennessee hospital EDs. While TDH was unable to validate whether all patients identified as residents of Florida were displaced because of Major Hurricane Irma, the timing of the rise and fall of patient encounters was highly suggestive. Likewise, seeing no substantial increase ED patients with residence in Texas reassured TDH that the effects of Hurricane Harvey were not impacting hospital emergency departments in Tennessee.TDH used information and charts from ESSENCE to support situational awareness in our SHOC and at TEMA. Use of patient zip code to identify out-of-state residents was more sensitive than chief complaint searches by keyword during this event. ESSENCE allowed TDH to see where out-of-state patients appeared to be concentrating in Tennessee and monitor the need for targeting messaging and resources to heavily affected areas. Additionally, close surveillance of chief complaints among out-of-state patients provided assurance that no unusual patterns in illness or injury were occurring.ESSENCE is the only TDH information source capable of rapidly collecting health information on out-of-state patients. ESSENCE allowed TDH to quickly identify a change within the patient population seen at Tennessee emergency departments and monitor the situation until the patient population returned to baseline levels.

scholarly journals Use of Emergency Department Data to Monitor and Respond to an Increase in Opioid Overdoses in New Hampshire, 2011-2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 73S-79S ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Daly ◽  
Kenneth Dufault ◽  
David J. Swenson ◽  
Paul Lakevicius ◽  
Erin Metcalf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
New Hampshire ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance ◽  
Situational Awareness ◽  
The United States ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Public Health Response ◽  
Syndromic Surveillance System ◽  
Icd Codes

Objectives: Opioid-related overdoses and deaths in New Hampshire have increased substantially in recent years, similar to increases observed across the United States. We queried emergency department (ED) data in New Hampshire to monitor opioid-related ED encounters as part of the public health response to this health problem. Methods: We obtained data on opioid-related ED encounters for the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015, from New Hampshire’s syndromic surveillance ED data system by querying for (1) chief complaint text related to the words “fentanyl,” “heroin,” “opiate,” and “opioid” and (2) opioid-related International Classification of Diseases ( ICD) codes. We then analyzed the data to calculate frequencies of opioid-related ED encounters by age, sex, residence, chief complaint text values, and ICD codes. Results: Opioid-related ED encounters increased by 70% during the study period, from 3300 in 2011 to 5603 in 2015; the largest increases occurred in adults aged 18-29 and in males. Of 20 994 total opioid-related ED visits, we identified 18 554 (88%) using ICD code alone, 690 (3%) using chief complaint text alone, and 1750 (8%) using both chief complaint text and ICD code. For those encounters identified by ICD code only, the corresponding chief complaint text included varied and nonspecific words, with the most common being “pain” (n = 3335, 18%), “overdose” (n = 1555, 8%), “suicidal” (n = 816, 4%), “drug” (n = 803, 4%), and “detox” (n = 750, 4%). Heroin-specific encounters increased by 827%, from 4% of opioid-related encounters in 2011 to 24% of encounters in 2015. Conclusions: Opioid-related ED encounters in New Hampshire increased substantially from 2011 to 2015. Data from New Hampshire’s ED syndromic surveillance system provided timely situational awareness to public health partners to support the overall response to the opioid epidemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document