scholarly journals Unsupervised Learning for Mental Stress Detection

Author(s):  
Dorien Huysmans ◽  
Elena Smets ◽  
Walter De Raedt ◽  
Chris Van Hoof ◽  
Katleen Bogaerts ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Paulo Santos ◽  
Peter Roth ◽  
Jorge M. Fernandes ◽  
Viktor Fetter ◽  
Valentina Vassilenko

Author(s):  
Nilava Mukherjee ◽  
Sumitra Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Rajarshi Gupta

Abstract Motivation: In recent times, mental stress detection using physiological signals have received widespread attention from the technology research community. Although many motivating research works have already been reported in this area, the evidence of hardware implementation is occasional. The main challenge in stress detection research is using optimum number of physiological signals, and real-time detection with low complexity algorithm. Objective: In this work, a real-time stress detection technique is presented which utilises only photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal to achieve improved accuracy over multi-signal-based mental stress detection techniques. Methodology: A short segment of 5s PPG signal was used for feature extraction using an autoencoder (AE), and features were minimized using recursive feature elimination (RFE) integrated with a multi-class support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Results: The proposed AE-RFE-SVM based mental stress detection technique was tested with WeSAD dataset to detect four-levels of mental state, viz., baseline, amusement, meditation and stress and to achieve an overall accuracy, F1 score and sensitivity of 99%, 0.99 and 98% respectively for 5s PPG data. The technique provided improved performance over discrete wavelet transformation (DWT) based feature extraction followed by classification with either of the five types of classifiers, viz., SVM, random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbour (k-NN), linear regression (LR) and decision tree (DT). The technique was translated into a quad-core-based standalone hardware (1.2 GHz, and 1 GB RAM). The resultant hardware prototype achieves a low latency (~0.4 s) and low memory requirement (~1.7 MB). Conclusion: The present technique can be extended to develop remote healthcare system using wearable sensors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 103935
Author(s):  
Jaakko Tervonen ◽  
Sampsa Puttonen ◽  
Mikko J. Sillanpää ◽  
Leila Hopsu ◽  
Zsolt Homorodi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rossana Castaldo ◽  
Luis Montesinos ◽  
Paolo Melillo ◽  
Sebastiano Massaro ◽  
Leandro Pecchia

Electronics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justas Šalkevicius ◽  
Robertas Damaševičius ◽  
Rytis Maskeliunas ◽  
Ilona Laukienė

Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) can have a significant impact towards assessing and potentially treating various anxiety disorders. One of the main strengths of VRET systems is that they provide an opportunity for a psychologist to interact with virtual 3D environments and change therapy scenarios according to the individual patient’s needs. However, to do this efficiently the patient’s anxiety level should be tracked throughout the VRET session. Therefore, in order to fully use all advantages provided by the VRET system, a mental stress detection system is needed. The patient’s physiological signals can be collected with wearable biofeedback sensors. Signals like blood volume pressure (BVP), galvanic skin response (GSR), and skin temperature can be processed and used to train the anxiety level classification models. In this paper, we combine VRET with mental stress detection and highlight potential uses of this kind of VRET system. We discuss and present a framework for anxiety level recognition, which is a part of our developed cloud-based VRET system. Physiological signals of 30 participants were collected during VRET-based public speaking anxiety treatment sessions. The acquired data were used to train a four-level anxiety recognition model (where each level of ‘low’, ‘mild’, ‘moderate’, and ‘high’ refer to the levels of anxiety rather than to separate classes of the anxiety disorder). We achieved an 80.1% cross-subject accuracy (using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation) and 86.3% accuracy (using 10 × 10 fold cross-validation) with the signal fusion-based support vector machine (SVM) classifier.


Author(s):  
Lucio Ciabattoni ◽  
Francesco Ferracuti ◽  
Sauro Longhi ◽  
Lucia Pepa ◽  
Luca Romeo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 28-41
Author(s):  
Adel Ali Al-Jumaily ◽  
Nafisa Matin ◽  
Azadeh Noori Hoshyar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document