scholarly journals Potential Utility of FDG PET-CT as a Non-invasive Tool for Monitoring Local Immune Responses

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungho Lee ◽  
Seohee Choi ◽  
Sang Yong Kim ◽  
Mi Jin Yun ◽  
Hyoung-Il Kim
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamaki Otani ◽  
Kazuya Kondo ◽  
Hiromitsu Takizawa ◽  
Koichiro Kajiura ◽  
Haruhiko Fujino ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Iman Sherif Ahmed ◽  
Saher Mohamed El Gaafary ◽  
Remon Zaher Elia ◽  
Rasha S. Hussein

Abstract Background Treatment response varies significantly among rectal cancer patients. Tumor can show complete regression, stationary appearance, or even tumour progression during the treatment. It is also widely known that the rate of local recurrence is variable. Precise risk stratification of tumor aggressiveness is required for better per patient tailored treatment plan and predicting the overall prognosis of rectal cancer patients The aim of this study was to assess different parameters of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography [(18F) FDG-PET/CT] as a non-invasive tool in predicting aggressiveness of the rectal cancer. Results Overall, 33 patients were included [19 moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, 10 poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and 4 mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC)]. SUV estimates (SUV max, SUV mean) were greater in the moderately adenocarcinoma group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.019, respectively). MTV and TLG values were similar between the three histopathological groups (p = 0.763 and p = 0.701, respectively). There was no correlation between SUVmax of primary tumor and MTV (r = 0.034; p = 0.849). However, SUVmax and TLG were significantly correlated (r = 0.517; p = 0.002). Strong correlation between tumor size and MTV (r = 0.489; p = 0.003), and TLG (r = 0.506; p = 0.003) were observed. No significant association was found between MTV and TLG and the clinical stage of rectal cancer. Conclusion Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters cannot be used alone as a non-invasive diagnostic technique in assessing aggressiveness and prognosis in patients with primary rectal cancer, and further clinical studies are needed before considering the prognostic role of FDG-PET/CT in rectal cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koramadai Kamaleshwaran ◽  
◽  
Ajit Shinto ◽  
Sudhakar Natarajan ◽  
Vyshakh Mohanan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (06) ◽  
pp. 531-541
Author(s):  
Natalie Desiree Klass ◽  
Richard P. Baum ◽  
Michael Schmuecking ◽  
Norbert Presselt ◽  
Klaus-Michael Mueller ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1180-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Martinez ◽  
M. A. Castilla-Lievre ◽  
C. Guillet-Caruba ◽  
G. Grenier ◽  
R. Fior ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (01) ◽  
pp. 09-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pauls ◽  
A. K. Buck ◽  
K. Hohl ◽  
G. Halter ◽  
M. Hetzel ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: In this prospective study, reliability of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of NSCLC was evaluated and compared to MDCT or PET alone. Patients, methods: 240 patients (pts) with suspected NSCLC were examined using PET/CT. Of those patients 112 underwent surgery comprising 80 patients with NSCLC (T1 n = 26, T2 n = 37, T3 n = 11, T4 n = 6). Imaging modalities were evaluated independently. Results: MDCT, PET and PET/CT diagnosed the correct T-stage in 40/80 pts (50%; CI: 0.39-0.61), 40/80 pts (50%; CI: 0.39-0.61) and 51/80 pts (64%; CI: 0.52-0.74), respectively, whereas equivocal T-stage was found in 15/80 pts (19%; CI: 0.11-0.19), 12/80 pts (15%; CI: 0.08-0.25) and 4/80 pts (5%; CI: 0.01-0.12), respectively. With PET/CT, T-stage was more frequently correct compared to MDCT (p = 0.003) or PET (p = 0.019). Pooling stages T1/T2, T-stage was correctly diagnosed with MDCT, PET and PET/CT in 54/80 pts (68%; CI: 0.56-0.78), 56/80 pts (70%; CI: 0.59-0.80) and 65/80 pts (81%; CI: 0.71-0.89). T3 stage was most difficult to diagnose. T3 tumors were correctly diagnosed with MDCT in 2/11 pts (18%; CI: 0.02-0.52) versus 0/11 pts (0%; CI: 0.00-0.28) with PET and 5/11 pts (45%; CI: 0.17-0.77) with PET/CT. In all imaging modalities, there were no equivocal findings for T4 tumors. Of these, MDCT found the correct tumor stage in 4/6 pts (67%; CI: 0.22-0.95), PET in 3/6 pts (50%; CI: 0.12-0.88) and PET/ CT in 5/6 pts (83%; CI: 0.36-0.99). Conclusion: Integrated PET/CT was significantly more accurate for T-staging of NSCLC compared to MDCT or PET alone. The advantages of PET/CT are especially pronounced combining T1- and T2-stage as well as in advanced tumors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1768
Author(s):  
Rosamaria Tricarico ◽  
Ting-Heng Chou ◽  
Susan Natalie Eisert ◽  
James Reinhardt ◽  
Kejal Shah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document