Evaluation of “Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India” (DIPSI) Criterion as a Diagnostic Test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction: In view of the alarmingly increasing incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), worldwide, as well as in India, a consensus to bring about standardization for diagnosis of GDM is needed. Internationally, the WHO 2013 criteria is being widely used, while (Diabetes In Pregnancy Study Group of India) DIPSI non fasting criteria is popularly used in India. There still remains many missed cases of GDM in India, which is a cause of concern. This study was done to compare the DIPSI non fasting, with WHO 2013 criteria for diagnosis of GDM. Methods: this cross-sectional study included 530 pregnant women, attending antenatal clinic of a tertiary care center, of North India, from Feb. 2018 to March 2019 and fulfilling inclusion criteria. All women attending antenatal clinic, during the study period, were subjected to capillary glucose evaluation, 2 hours after 75g oral glucose load, irrespective of the timing of last meal (DIPSI), as part of routine antenatal checkup. After 7 days, only those 530 women, who turned up in fasting state, and fulfilled inclusion criteria, were enrolled in the study and subjected to fasting 75g, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (WHO 2013). Accuracy of DIPSI test was compared, to the fasting WHO 2013 criteria. Capillary glucose was measured using regular, well calibrated, point of care, “Optium Free Style” glucometer. Results: Out of 107 women diagnosed to have GDM by WHO 2013 criteria, only 89 were diagnosed by the DIPSI criteria. DIPSI had a low sensitivity (83.18%) when compared to the WHO 2013 criteria, Conclusion: This study showed that when non fasting DIPSI criteria was used as diagnostic criteria, 10.58% women with GDM, missed the diagnosis. Considering the adverse maternal and perinatal outcome of GDM, implication of missed diagnosis would be grave, especially in a developing country, like India. Hence, use of DIPSI criteria for diagnosing GDM should be reconsidered. Key words: GDM, DIPSI, OGTT, Diabetes in Pregnancy.

Download Full-text

PREVALENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS IN AN URBAN INDIAN COHORT USING DIABETES IN PREGNANCY STUDY GROUP IN INDIA (DIPSI) CRITERIA – VALIDATING ONE-STEP APPROACH

International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research ◽

10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2018.2.9317 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 13-19

Author(s):

S. Khan ◽

H. Bal ◽

I. D. Khan ◽

D. Paul

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Single Step ◽

Oral Glucose ◽

Study Cohort ◽

Study Group ◽

Diabetes In Pregnancy ◽

Two Phase ◽

In Pregnancy

Background. India is the “World’s Diabetes capital”, with half the diabetic population being women. Early detection of glucose intolerance during pregnancy offers a timely opportunity for screening, management and prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and prevents fetal complications. Objective. The study assessed the prevalence of GDM in an Indian cohort using the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study group of India (DIPSI) criteria. Methods. 200 pregnant women underwent two-phase testing with non-fasting 75-gram glucose challenge under Diabetes in Pregnancy Study group of India (DIPSI) criteria at <20 weeks and between 24-28 weeks period of gestation. A 3-hour 100-gm oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was used for confirmation. Repeat testing was done for women negative during the first-phase. Results. Mean age was 24.26±3.75 years with 52.5% multigravidas. Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 20.7±3.07 kg/m2. The prevalence of GDM in study cohort was found to be 15.5% using the DIPSI criteria while the prevalence of GDM after 100 g OGTT was 13.0%. GDM was mostly seen to occur in women of 26-30-year age group. Statistically significant associations for age and GDM, and BMI and GDM were evidenced. Conclusions. Maternal age of ≥25 years should be adopted as a risk factor for the development of GDM. The DIPSI criteria offer a cost-effective and an evidence-based protocol for a single-step definitive glucose test for both screening and diagnosis of pregnant patients belonging to any socio-economic strata; furthering its implementation for public health obstetrics.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of diabetes in pregnancy study group India diagnostic criterion in detecting gestational diabetes mellitus: a rural Bangalore study

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology ◽

10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200344 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 601

Author(s):

Rajiv Kumar Saxena ◽

Noor Fathima Tameem Ansari ◽

Pallavi Singh

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

False Negative ◽

Oral Glucose ◽

Study Group ◽

Diabetes In Pregnancy ◽

Capillary Sample ◽

Iadpsg Criteria ◽

Venous Sample ◽

In Pregnancy

Background: The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is considered the current standard for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups (IADPSG) recommends OGTT, with fasting, one-hour and two-hour venous blood samples drawn after intake of 75g oral glucose. In the Indian context, diabetes in pregnancy study group in India (DIPSI) recommends glucose challenge test (GCT), where 75 g glucose is given irrespective of the fasting state, and a single venous sample is drawn after two-hour. Diagnosis of GDM is made, if any cut-off value is met or exceeded. This prospective study was conducted to compare the DIPSI and IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of GDM.Methods: Pregnant women between 24 to 28 weeks of gestation were subjected to non-fasting GCT. Capillary sample were also drawn simultaneously using Accu check active glucometer. These women were counselled to undergo a standard 75gram OGTT, within a week of recruitment.Results: According to IADPSG criteria, 17.6% (18/102) of our participants had GDM, as compared to 19.6% (20/102) by DIPSI criteria using venous samples, and 25.3% (25/99) by capillary sample method. Sensitivity and specificity of GCT using venous sample was 72.22% and 91.67%, and using capillary sample was 70.59% and 84.15% respectively. DIPSI criteria using venous samples wrongly labelled 8.3% women as GDM, and capillary samples wrongly labelled 15.9% women as GDM. More importantly DIPSI criteria using venous samples labelled 27.8% women as false-negative and capillary samples labelled 29.4% women as false-negative for GDM. Almost one quarter of women with GDM will be missed if DIPSI criteria is used as a universal screening modality.Conclusions: We suggest that the IADPSG criteria be used for diagnosis of GDM in antenatal women in India.

Download Full-text