scholarly journals THE HISTORY OF SEVEN WOMEN IN CHEMISTRY

2009 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Albino Oliveira NUNES ◽  
Anne Gabriella Dias SANTOS ◽  
Francisco das Chagas Silva SOUZA ◽  
Valéria Regina Carvalho de OLIVEIRA

This work talks about female participation in the Chemistry development. Accosting the role that women contributed on this science history, and limitation to her bigger involvement. To this, historic icons like Almira Lincoln Phelp (writer) and Marie Curie (physicist) are studied, once they are representative of the assumed function of the women during many centuries of Chemistry's known building. Starting of her contributions, a profile can be plotted. Falling the qualification that in the Antiquity, the female action can be practice in a prevailing area, a status only recapture in the XX century.

Author(s):  
Holger Schulze

Sound affects and pervades our body in a physical as well as a phenomenological sense: a notion that may sound fairly trivial today. But for a long time in Western history ‘sound’ was no scientific entity. It was looked upon merely as the lower, material appearance of truly higher forces: of more ephemeral, angel-, spirit- or godlike structures – and later of compositional knowledge. To be interested in sound was to be defamed as being unscientific, noncompositional, unmanly. Which steps were taken historically that gradually gave sound the character of a scientific entity? This article moves along recent science history: since the nineteenth century when the physicality of sound and later the corporeality of sonic experiences were first discovered and tentatively described. Exemplary studies from the science history of acoustics, musicology and anthropology of the senses are analysed and restudied – from Hermann von Helmholtz to Michel Serres. Even today, we may ask ourselves: What would an auditorily-founded research be like? Could there be a field of sensory research – via sensing sound?


2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-213
Author(s):  
Jessica Blatt

As someone whose training is in political science and who writes about the history of my own discipline, I admit to some hesitation in recommending future avenues of research for historians of education. For that reason, the following thoughts are directed toward disciplinary history broadly and social science history specifically. Moreover, the three articles that contributors to this forum were asked to use as inspiration suggest that any future I would recommend has been under way in one form or another for a while. For those reasons, I want to reframe my contribution as a reflection on a particular mode of analysis all three authors employed and how it may be particularly useful for exploring the questions of power, exclusion, and race- and gender-making in the academy that are present in all three articles and that explicitly animate two of them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document