Face Threatening Acts in Wayang Golek

<p>This study aims at describing negative and positive face threatening acts of puppetry’s figures in Wayang Golek show. The data use are puppetry figure’s spoken conversation dialogue in Wayang Golek show. The findings to study are the expressions of negative face threatening acts of order and request, suggestion, advice, threat, offer, promise, compliment, expression of strong emotion of hatred and anger toward hearer. The positive face threatening acts are the expressions of disapproval, criticism, contempt, insult, challenge, expression of violent emotion, irreverence, mention of taboo topic, bringing of bad news about hearer, blatant non-cooperation in activity of making non-sequiturs, and use of address terms of status-marked identification in initial encounter. </p>

Download Full-text

TERMS OF ADDRESS IN PESISIR BARUS NORTH SUMATERA

LINGUISTICA ◽

10.24114/jalu.v10i2.26536 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 485

Author(s):

PUTRI MAYASARI TANJUNG ◽

ZAINUDDIN ZAINUDDIN ◽

AMRIN SARAGIH

Keyword(s):

Qualitative Research ◽

Quantitative Method ◽

Video Recording ◽

Data Use ◽

Family Relationship ◽

Qualitative And Quantitative ◽

And Function ◽

Address Terms ◽

Descriptive Qualitative

The writer was found the result of this study about Terms of Address in Pesisir Barus Notrth Sumatera Kecamatan Barus, Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah. this study aims to determine the kinds and factors of using Address Terms in Pesisir Barus community. And the data use by applying descriptive qualitative and quantitative method. The source of data was taken from the interviewing, video, recording and conversation in community. The technique for analyzing the data is descriptive qualitative research based on Wardaugh’s. The result of this reserach was kinds, factors and function in Pesisir Barus Community. The most dominant kinds the terns of address are used by pesisir barus community is RT (62 times), the most dominant rarely used by pesisir barus community is KT (56 times), PN (16 times), FN (11 times), and MT (2 times), IT (4 times) is seldom used by Pesisir Barus Community. There are four kinds factors and function of the terns of address in Pesisir Barus Community can be divided as G (Gender), A (Age), FR (Family Relationship). R (Respect). With the total factors of address terms used by Pesisir Barus Community was analysis G (27 times), A (28 times), FR (36 times), R (60 times).

Download Full-text

Choice of address terms in conversational setting

Journal of Human Sciences ◽

10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3489 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 982 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Fatma Hülya Özcan

Keyword(s):

Potential Effect ◽

Primary Concern ◽

Address Forms ◽

Awareness Raising ◽

Pragmatic Aspect ◽

Pragmatic Aspects ◽

Negative Face ◽

The Relationship ◽

Address Terms ◽

Effect Of Age

A choice of an address term signals the relationship between language and society and how a person imagines his/her relationship with the addressee within this society. Address terms, therefore, provides sociolinguistic information about the interlocutors as well as pragmatic aspect of the situation. Previous research have focused on the effect of power and solidarity in the choice of address terms. This study, on the other hand, focuses on the address terms used during spontaneous conversation taking place in a no-power situation. The primary concern of the study is to identify the potential effects of a bilingual situation and a different culture. This study investigated the address terms school children use in a reciprocal situation, which are further analyzed regarding the potential effect of age, gender and being monolingual or bilingual in this issue. For this purpose, the group conversations of 56 monolingual Turkish speaking and 48 monolingual Turkish-Danish speaking children were analyzed. The address terms are coded and classified as emerged from the data. The results have shown that monolingual children use a great variety of address terms while bilingual children dwell on first names more frequently. Choice of address forms are governed by politeness, and positive and negative face. The results will lead to awareness-raising on pragmatic aspects of conversations and social relationship and will have implications on educational context especially in bilingual settings.

Download Full-text