Ipersensibilità ai FANS: intolleranza o allergia?

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
Laura Levantino ◽  
Cristiana Corrado ◽  
Laura Badina ◽  
Sara Lega ◽  
Egidio Barbi
Keyword(s):  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Provocation Tests ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Drug Provocation Tests ◽  
Cox 1

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the main triggers of drug hypersensitivity reactions in children. According to the EAACI latest classification NSAIDs hypersensitivity reactions are differentiated into cross-reactive reactions, with non-immunological mechanisms (based on COX-1 inhibition), and selective reactions, with immunological mechanisms. Paediatric clinical manifestations of NSAID hypersensitivity are typically cutaneous, but sometimes, similarly to anaphylaxis, can involve other systems, especially the respiratory one. Differentiating between NSAID intolerance and NSAID allergy through drug provocation tests is crucial for the patient because the two clinical entities require different management.

scholarly journals Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced hypersensitivity reactions

2019 ◽  
pp. 411-416
Author(s):  
Andrei Gheorghe Vicovan ◽  
Liliana Veres ◽  
Andrei Cucu ◽  
Dana Turliuc ◽  
Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc
Keyword(s):  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Clinical Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Tests ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Immunological Mechanism ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

The role of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in neurosurgical practice is a secondary one, however they are still constantly involved in perioperative management of pain or in nonoperative management of acute radiculopathy. Beside the well-known adverse reactions (ADRs), the neurosurgeon practitioner should also take in account the drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) of NSAIDs and be able to deal with it. The aim of this paper was to review the diagnostic and management steps for NSAIDs-induced Hypersensitivity Reactions. The actual stratification of NSAIDs-induced Hypersensitivity Reactions is based on understanding of the heterogeneity of immunological/non-immunological mechanisms of reactions and complexity of clinical manifestations. Practically, this stratification allows the physician to assess suspicion of DHR, based on anamnesis and clinical analysis, and to consider further practical steps to manage and eventually confirm the diagnosis. Drug allergies are considered only the DHRs for which a definite immunological mechanism (either drug-specific antibody or T cell) is demonstrated. In conclusion, clinical analysis and anamnesis of patient with NSAIDs-induced Hypersensitivity Reactions can be realized by any physician and could be enough to diagnose, but it is not sufficient to confirm the diagnosis. In vitro tests and oral provocation challenges may be necessary to be undertaken by an allergy specialist.

Early Biomarkers for Severe Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 3829-3839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Ariza ◽  
Maria J. Torres ◽  
Carmen Moreno-Aguilar ◽  
Rubén Fernández-Santamaría ◽  
Tahia D. Fernández
Keyword(s):  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Early Biomarkers ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Delayed Reactions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are typically classified into immediate and delayed reactions based on the time interval between drug exposure and onset of symptoms. Clinical manifestations range from mild to severe and life-threatening reactions. The most severe clinical entities are anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock for immediate reactions, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions such as Steven Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis for delayed reactions. The diagnosis is complex and challenging, as drug provocation tests and even skin tests can be very risky procedures, which makes them not recommended. Therefore, it is necessary to search for useful early biomarkers to manage the diagnosis of these reactions. These biomarkers could be useful to determine the clinical entity, but not to identify the culprit drug. Some of the currently available biomarkers are few genetic associations of drug allergy with polymorphisms of human leukocyte antigen (HLA), the detection of inflammatory and lipid mediators in serum, or the detection of cytokines, chemokines, and cytotoxic markers in skin biopsies. In this literature review, it has been summarize the immunological mechanisms involved in severe reactions, both immediate and delayed, and different early biomarkers: those currently used for the diagnosis of these reactions as well as possible early biomarkers that could be useful with further studies to standardize their clinical use.

scholarly journals Diagnosing and Managing Patients with Reactions to Radiocontrast Media

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-221
Author(s):  
Knut Brockow
Keyword(s):  
Skin Testing ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Provocation Tests ◽  
Ring Molecules ◽  
Allergic Skin ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Drug Provocation Tests

Abstract Purpose of the review Iodinated radio contrast media (RCM) belong to the most common elicitors of drug hypersensitivity reactions (HR). Urticaria or anaphylaxis may occur ≤ 1(−6) hour(s) (immediate HR) and exanthems (non-immediate HR) develop > 6 h after application of RCM. Evidence for an immunologic mechanism of RCM HR against the different RCM benzene ring molecules and the benefit of allergological testing in patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions is progressively increasing. Recent findings Positive skin tests can confirm allergy in patients with previous reactions to RCM and help to select alternative better tolerated RCMs. Severe hypersensitivity reactions are mainly caused by an allergic mechanism, whereas the majority of non-severe reactions appear to be non-allergic. Skin testing is highly recommended to help identify allergic hypersensitivity reactions and to select alternatives. Using structurally different RCM is more effective than premedication for the prevention of future reactions. Drug provocation tests to RCM have been increasingly used, but are not yet standardized among different centers. Summary In patients with previous severe hypersensitivity reactions to RCM, skin testing is recommended. For future RCM-enhanced examinations in patients with previous reactions, structurally different, skin test-negative preparations should be applied. Drug provocation tests do confirm or exclude RCM hypersensitivity or may demonstrate tolerability of alternative RCMs.

scholarly journals Pharmacogenomics of Hypersensitivity to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoang Kim Tu Trinh ◽  
Le Duy Pham ◽  
Kieu Minh Le ◽  
Hae-Sim Park
Keyword(s):  
Acid Metabolism ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Arachidonic Acid Metabolism ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Lipoxygenase Pathway ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Larger Sample

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are extensively prescribed in daily clinical practice. NSAIDs are the main cause of drug hypersensitivity reactions all over the world. The inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes by NSAIDs can perpetuate arachidonic acid metabolism, shunting to the 5-lipoxygenase pathway and its downstream inflammatory process. Clinical phenotypes of NSAID hypersensitivity are diverse and can be classified into cross-reactive or selective responses. Efforts have been made to understand pathogenic mechanisms, in which, genetic and epigenetic backgrounds are implicated in various processes of NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Although there were some similarities among patients, several genetic polymorphisms are distinct in those exhibiting respiratory or cutaneous symptoms. Moreover, the expression levels, as well as the methylation status of genes related to immune responses were demonstrated to be involved in NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions. There is still a lack of data on delayed type reactions. Further studies with a larger sample size, which integrate different genetic pathways, can help overcome current limitations of gen etic/epigenetic studies, and provide valuable information on NSAID hypersensitivity reactions.

Drug provocation tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A. Zambonino ◽  
Maria J. Torres ◽  
Candelaria Muñoz ◽  
Gloria Requena ◽  
Cristobalina Mayorga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Provocation Tests ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Drug Provocation Tests

scholarly journals Analysis of the Costs Associated With the Elective Evaluation of Patients Labelled as Allergic to Beta-Lactams or Nonsteroidal Antiinflamatory Agents

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Sobrino-García ◽  
Esther M. Moreno ◽  
Francisco J. Muñoz-Bellido ◽  
Maria T. Gracia-Bara ◽  
Elena Laffond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Bibliographic Search ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Introduction: Being labelled as allergic to different drugs results in patients receiving other treatments, which are more toxic, less effective and more expensive. We aimed to analyze different studies of the costs of drug hypersensitivity assessment.Methods: A bibliographic search on studies regarding this issue was performed, including the available scientific evidence up to June 2020. We searched three databases with terms related to costs and allergy testing in drug hypersensitivity reactions.Results: Our search revealed 1,430 publications, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. In the manuscript, prospective studies evaluating the costs of the evaluation of patients with suspected allergy to beta-lactams or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are analyzed. Also, comment is made on the costs associated with incorrect labeling as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or penicillin hypersensitivity.Conclusions: Taking all costs into account, the study of drug hypersensitivity is not expensive, particularly considering the economic and clinical consequences of labeling a patient with hypersensitivity to drugs.

scholarly journals INVESTIGATION OF MEDICALLY INDUCED SKIN REACTIONS BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF REPORTS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA (FROM 2009 TO 2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Matveev ◽  
А. E. Krasheninnikov ◽  
E. A. Egorova ◽  
Е. I. Konyaeva
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
World Health ◽  
Report Cards ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
The Republic

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are among the most important problems that arise when using drugs. The occurrence of such reactions in the population is at least 7% and tends to a constant increase. The most frequent manifestations of drug hypersensitivity reactions are medically induced skin lesions.The aimof this research was to study and analyze the cases of development of skin drug reactions on the basis of the reports on the adverse reactions (ADRs) of the drugs, registered in the Republic of Crimea in the period from 2009 to 2016.Materials and methods.The objects of the research were report cards about the adverse reactions, registered in the regional base (registry) of spontaneous messages called ARCADe (Adverse Reactions in Crimea, Autonomic Database) for the period from 2009 to 2016. During the analysis of the report cards, 2,698 cases of the development of skin drug reactions arising in response to the use of drugs in patients were selected. The study of the frequency of occurrence of skin drug reactions in the application of various groups of drugs was carried out taking into account the codes of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Сlassification System of drugs of the World Health Organization (WHO).Results.Of the study showed that the development of skin drug reactions was most often associated with the use of antimicrobial agents for internal use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), drugs for the treatment of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract and agents that affect the nervous system. Among the clinical manifestations of skin drug reactions, generalized and localized rashes prevailed, and itching and hyperemia of the skin were much less common in patients. The analysis of age categories showed that the most frequently medically induced reactions occurred in children from birth to 3 years, as well as in the age group of patients from 46 to 60 years. The risk factors identified in the course of the analysis, were female gender, early childhood and old age, as well as the presence of aggravated drug allergy history.Conclusion.Drug hypersensitivity reactions create certain difficulties in clinical practice related to the diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis, and may also cause danger to health or life of patients. In this connection, the study of such adverse reactions is the most important task of practical health care and requires direct participation of doctors of all specialties.

scholarly journals Non-immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions secondary to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Moret ◽  
A. Ambresin ◽  
C. Gianniou ◽  
J. Bijon ◽  
C. Besse-Hayat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factors

Abstract Purpose To describe a series of non-immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Patients and methods Retrospective report of 6 patients with cutaneous non-immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, 4 after ranibizumab, 1 after bevacizumab and 1 after aflibercept. Results Clinical manifestations ranged from mild maculopapular rash, purpura to severe generalized erythroderma, with or without systemic involvement such as microscopic hematuria and proteinuria or fever. In two out of the six patients, reintroduction of either the same or an alternative anti-VEGF drug did induce a recurrence of the drug hypersensitivity reaction, while 4 patients showed no recurrence. Conclusion Cutaneous non-immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions secondary to intravitreal anti-VEGF may occur. Continuation of the same drug or switch to another anti-VEGF may either induce recurrence or be well supported by the patient. The decision of drug discontinuation should be guided by the severity of the disease.

scholarly journals ANAMNESTIC, CLINICAL AND LABORATORY DATA ANALYSIS OF PATIENTS FOR DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-13
Author(s):  
Svitlana Zubchenko ◽  
Iryna Kril ◽  
Marta Lomikovska ◽  
Anna Havrylyuk ◽  
Kristina Lischuk-Yakymovych ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Basophil Activation Test ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Test Execution ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

The current development of the pharmaceutical industry in the synthesis of new chemical compounds, standardized treatment protocols, and disease prevention can lead to a progressive increase in drug hypersensitivity reactions, which often have serious consequences for human health. Increasing evidence of involvement of infections, including Herpesviridae viruses, in the development of drug hypersensitivity reactions is known.The method of flow cytometry can be used, in particular, the basophil activation test to diagnose drug hypersensitivity reactions. The anamnestic, clinical, andlaboratory data of 368 people were analyzed for the selection of patients at risk of drug hypersensitivity for the basophil degranulation test execution. It was found that among patients hypersensitivity reactions were most often detected to antibiotics (50.0%), radiopaque substances (27.7%), perioperative drugs, local anesthetics - 13.6% each. Clinical manifestations of these reactions were urticaria with angioneurotic edema (40.6%), urticaria (28.1%), anaphylaxis (21.9%), obstructive bronchitis chenges (9.37%). According to anamnestic and clinical-laboratory data, patients with a high risk of drug hypersensitivity reactions revealed frequent manifestations of herpesvirus infection HSV1 (34.4%), active chronic persistence of EBV (59.4%), accompanied by manifestations of EBV-associated secondary immune disorders and prevalence of chronic EBV infection in all patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document