scholarly journals Mallet fracture type III Tubiana's classification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Nicoletti
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amine Belmoubarik ◽  
Karim Ahed ◽  
Marouane Abouchane ◽  
Mohamed Amine Mahraoui ◽  
Yassir Elandaloussi ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrence D. Julien ◽  
Bruce Frankel ◽  
Vincent C. Traynelis ◽  
Timothy C. Ryken

Object The management of odontoid fractures remains controversial. Evidence-based methodology was used to review the published data on odontoid fracture management to determine the state of the current practices reported in the literature. Methods The Medline literature (1966–1999) was searched using the keywords “odontoid,” “odontoid fracture,” and “cervical fracture” and graded using a four-tiered system. Those articles meeting selection criteria were divided in an attempt to formulate practice guidelines and standards or options for each fracture type. Evidentiary tables were constructed by treatment type. Ninety-five articles were reviewed. Five articles for Type I, 16 for Type II, and 14 for Type III odontoid fractures met selection criteria. All studies reviewed contained Class III data (American Medical Association data classification). Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to establish a standard or guideline for odontoid fracture management. Given the extent of Class III evidence and outcomes reported on Type I and Type III fractures, a well-designed case-controlled study would appear to provide sufficient evidence to establish a practice guideline, suggesting that cervical immobilization for 6 to 8 weeks is appropriate management. In cases of Type II fracture, analysis of the Class III evidence suggests that both operative and nonoperative management remain treatment options. A randomized trial or serial case-controlled studies will be required to establish either a guideline or treatment standard for this fracture type.


Orthopedics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 899-902
Author(s):  
Richard S Sherman ◽  
Terry R Light
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 125-127
Author(s):  
Kiminori Yukata ◽  
Sho Nakai ◽  
Masaki Ikeda ◽  
Jun-ichi Hamawaki

We describe a case of isolated physeal fracture of ulna distal end in a 13-year-old boy. This fracture type is uncommon, especially Salter-Harris type III of this injury has not been reported. Plain radiographs showed a small vertical fracture line at the ulnar distal end and an enlargement of epiphyseal plate at the base of ulnar styloid process. The present case was successfully managed with conservative treatment because of its minimal displacement.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 478-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Radke ◽  
S. J. Langley-Hobbs ◽  
G. M. Hayes

SummarySalter-Harris type III fractures of the distal humerus in a four-month-old male Labrador Retriever and a male crossbreed dog (estimated to be 3.5-months-old) are reported. Both fractures were treated with open reduction and interfragmentary compression by lag screw fixation. Both fractures healed and full limb use was regained at four weeks postoperatively.The occurrence of this unusual fracture type may be related to the physeal closure pattern of the distal humeral physis, and a different mechanism of injury compared to the more common Salter-Harris type IV fracture seen in this region.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S144-S145
Author(s):  
P. Pennequin ◽  
J.-B Pic ◽  
C. Breque ◽  
P. Bouget ◽  
J.-P Richer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Tang ◽  
Yuan He Fan ◽  
Ye Hui Liao ◽  
Qiang Tang ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study describes a morphology-based unilateral cervical facet interlocking classification in an attempt to clarify the injury mechanism, instability, neurological deficits, radiological features, and determine optimum management strategies for these injuries. A total of 55 patients with unilateral cervical locked facet (UCLF) involving C3 to C7 were identified between January 1, 2012 and December 1, 2019. The injuries were classified into three types, and they were further divided into six subtypes using three-dimensional computed tomography. The injury mechanism, clinical features, neurological deficits, and imaging characteristics were analyzed, and the appropriate treatment strategies for UCLF were discussed. UCLFs were divided into the following six subtypes: UCLF without lateral mass-facet fracture (type I) in nine cases, with superior articular process fracture (type II A) in 22, with inferior articular process fracture (type II B) in seven, both superior and inferior articular process fractures (type II C) in four, with lateral mass splitting fracture (type III A) in three, and with lateral mass comminution fractures (type III B) in ten. A total of 22 (40.0%) of the 55 patients presented with radiculopathy, and 23 patients (41.8%) had spinal cord injuries. The subtype analyses showed high rates of radiculopathy in types II A (68.2%) and II C (75.0%), as well as significant spinal cord injury in types I (77.8%) and III (61.5%). Destruction of the facet capsule was observed in all patients, but the injury of disc, ligamentous complex, and vertebra had a significant difference among the types or subtypes. The instability parameters of the axial rotation angle, segmental kyphosis, and sagittal displacement showed significant differences in various types of UCLF. Closed reduction by preoperative and intraoperative general anesthesia traction was achieved in 27 patients (49.1%), and successful rate of closed reduction in type I (22.2%) was significantly lower than that in type II (51.5%) and type III (61.5%). A total of 35 of 55 patients underwent a single anterior fixation and fusion, 10 patients were treated with posterior pedicle and (or) lateral mass fixation, and combined surgery was performed in ten patients. Ten patients (18.2%) with a poor outcome were observed after first surgery. Among them, 3 patients treated with a single anterior surgery had persistent or aggravated radiculopathy and posterior approach surgery with ipsilateral facet resection, foramen enlargement, and pedicle and (or) lateral mass screw fixation was performed immediately, 5 patients treated with a short-segment posterior surgery showed mild late kyphosis deformity, and 2 patients with vertebral malalignment were encountered after anterior single-level fusion during the follow-up. This retrospective study indicated that UCLF is a rotationally unstable cervical spine injury. The classification proposed in this study will contribute to understanding the injury mechanism, radiological characteristics, and neurological deficits in various types of UCLF, which will help the surgeons to evaluate the preoperative closed reduction and guide the selection of surgical approach and fusion segment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document