scholarly journals Liberdades de expressão e de informação em face da igualdade e dignidade humana: o caso Siegfried Ellwanger | Freedoms of speech and of information facing the of human equality and dignity: The case of Siegfried Ellwanger |

KPGT_dlutz_1 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Gina Marcilio Pompeu ◽  
Rosa Julia Plá Coelho

Resumo: Este artigo versa sobre os aspectos mais relevantes da regulação do direito fundamental de expressão e de informação e de sua colisão com outros direitos, no plano jurídico internacional e brasileiro. O estudo compila julgados dos Tribunais Internacionais e outros órgãos responsáveis pelo monitoramento de tratados de Direitos Humanos, com o escopo de apontar formas de solução para os conflitos de bens hoje existentes. Igualmente, discute a previsão e o tratamento dado à tais direitos no ordenamento constitucional brasileiro. Finalmente, analisa um hard case julgado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal - caso Siegfried Ellwanger -, no qual a colisão entre os direitos protegidos se evidenciou, apontando a solução para o choque entre o direito de livre expressão e a dignidade humana. Palavras-chaves: Colisão de direitos fundamentais. Direitos humanos. Liberdade de expressão. Liberdade de informação. Igualdade. Dignidade humana. Abstract: This article deals with the most relevant aspects of the fundamental right of speech and of information and its collision with other rights, in the international and Brazilian juridical spheres. The study carried out in its context compiles rulings of the international tribunals and other bodies responsible for the monitoring of human rights treaties, with the purpose of pointing out ways of solving the conflicts of goods that exist today. It also discusses the prediction and treatment of such rights in the Brazilian constitutional order. Finally, it analyzes a hard case judged by the Supreme Federal Court (STF) (Siegfried Ellwanger’s case), in which the collision between the rights protected was evident, pointing out the solution to the clash between the right of free expression and human dignity. Keywords: Collision between fundamental rights. Equality. Freedom of expression. Freedom of information. Human dignity. Human Rights.

Author(s):  
Richard Clements

The Q&A series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each chapter includes typical questions; diagram problem and essay answer plans, suggested answers, notes of caution, tips on obtaining extra marks, the key debates on each topic and suggestions on further reading. This chapter moves on from the previous one to examine the freedom of expression. Under common law, freedom of speech is guaranteed unless the speaker breaks the law, but this is now reinforced by the right of free expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. The questions here deal with issues such as obscenity law and contempt of court; the Official Secrets Act; freedom of information; breach of confidence and whether there is a right of privacy in English law.


Author(s):  
Lisa P. Ramsey

Trademark laws currently allow companies to obtain trademark rights in product configurations, colors, scents, sounds, flavors, textures, and other “non-traditional” marks that identify and distinguish the source of goods or services. This chapter argues that non-traditional trademarks convey expression protected by the right to freedom of expression in constitutions, human rights treaties, and statutes. Not only do distinctive non-traditional marks communicate source-identifying information, but these product attributes may also intrinsically convey information, ideas, or other messages unrelated to the trademark owner. Therefore trademark laws regulating this expression must have a sufficient justification, and governments should repeal or revise laws protecting non-traditional marks when they do not directly further trademark law’s goals and harm free expression. Nations should refuse to register non-traditional marks that expressed inherently valuable messages unrelated to source-identification before they were adopted or used as marks, or only grant such marks narrow protection.


Author(s):  
Abdullah Haqyar

The phenomenon of human rights, in its contemporary sense, is not even ancient in Western thought, and it came from the context of a social and political movement in France, and the most important of the fundamental rights that collected under this title is the right to life, the right to liberty, the right to equality, the right to asylum, the right to freedom of expression, the right to freedom of opinion and religion, women's rights, the right to participate in social and political life, and the right to personal property. It is an established principle that the first condition for the exercise of these rights is their incompatibility with the rights of other human beings and their human rights. The philosophical basis of human rights in the West consists of three important principles: the principle of human dignity, equality and justice. But the difference between human rights in the West and Islam is that "God" is at the center of the Islamic worldview, while in the Western world the "man" is the central one, and man is the measure of all rights. A clearer interpretation of the two types of "God-centered" or "human-centered" ideas in the West is the predominance of human-centeredness and in Islam the predominance of God-centeredness. The philosophical foundations of human rights in Islam are the principle of human dignity, the principle of God-seeking, the principle of human immortality, and the principle of its developmental relation to the set of being.


Author(s):  
Richard Clements

The Q&A series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each chapter includes typical questions; diagram problem and essay answer plans, suggested answers, notes of caution, tips on obtaining extra marks, the key debates on each topic and suggestions on further reading. This chapter moves on from the previous one to examine the freedom of expression. Under common law, freedom of speech is guaranteed unless the speaker breaks the law, but this is now reinforced by the right of free expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. The questions here deal with issues such as obscenity law and contempt of court; the Official Secrets Act; freedom of information; breach of confidence and whether there is a right of privacy in English law.


Author(s):  
Melanie Studer ◽  
Kurt Pärli

In Switzerland, the participation in certain work programmes is an eligibility criterion to social assistance benefits and the constitutionally granted right to the financial means required for a decent standard of living. This chapter examines whether the implementation of these programmes is in accordance with fundamental rights and more precisely, whether they respect the normative framework elaborated in Chapter 4. As will be shown, the right to financial assistance when in need has close links to human dignity. Therefore, the evaluation of the mentioned work programmes against the human rights background leads to some critical conclusions on their compatibility with international human rights law in general and human dignity in particular. Especially, the authors argue that the Swiss Federal Supreme Court’s case law lacks a comprehensive approach for the evaluation of human rights infringements in this context.


This chapter concerns the statutory prohibitions on unauthorized disclosures of information contained in the Official Secrets Act 1989, and their interrelationship with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It identifies the categories of information protected by, and the persons subject to, the 1989 Act. The elements of the various offences created by that Act are discussed, in particular the requirements for disclosures to be made without lawful authority and to be damaging to a specified national interest. The chapter examines the question of compatibility between the 1989 Act and the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, focusing on the House of Lords’ decision in the case of David Shayler. It concludes by considering which of the exemptions from the right of access under the 2000 Act may apply to information within the scope of the 1989 Act.


2021 ◽  
pp. 263-270
Author(s):  
William A. Schabas

Political rights are often grouped with civil rights as if both adjectives apply to certain categories, and some fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression, can be described as belonging to both categories. But the concept of political rights has an autonomous meaning. It applies specifically to the democratic vision of human rights, encompassing the right to participate in government, the right to vote and the right to participate in government. Elections must be both genuinie and periodic, based upon universal and equal suffrage and by secret vote or an equivalent free voting procedure. Equal access to the public service is also comprised within political rights.


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Perrone

The protection of ‘morals’ appears frequently as a limitation on the exercise of fundamental rights, both in international covenants and in constitutional charters. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights is not an exception, and ‘public morals’ may be called upon to justify the restriction of several important rights granted by the Convention, such as freedom of expression or the right to respect for private and family life. To avoid arbitrary restrictions of these rights it is important to understand the meaning of this general clause. This article aims to suggest a reading of the ‘public morals’ clause that singles out its scope and its boundaries.


Author(s):  
Szabolcs Stock

The aim of the article is to present how one can excercise their freedom of expression through acts. I focus ont the decisions of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights and the U. S. Supreme court. I analyze these decisions, and compare the fundamental rights that can collide, such as freedom of expression versus the right to property, which one should prevail when they come into collision. I also study how one can decide, whether the act should fall within the protected circle of the freedom of expression, or it should be penalized as a crime, or misdemeanor.


2021 ◽  
pp. 85-105
Author(s):  
Domingos Miguel Soares Farinho

The paper carries out a legal appraisal of the recently approved Portuguese Charter of Human Rights in the Digital Age. It analyses its structure both as a human rights instrument and as Portuguese fundamental rights instrument focusing on new norms introduced in the system and redundant ones. In this latter case interpretation problems are highlighted, in particular when considering the Portuguese open clause of Article 16 of the Constitution that allows for fundamental rights approved by ordinary laws.  Finally, a specific new right is given special attention - the right to protection against disinformation – especially concerning its relation with the freedom of expression. The paper aims to show that the scope of the new provision would allow an unconstitutional restriction on the freedom of expression and that a valid norm must be determined by adequate balancing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document