scholarly journals Successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy after craniosynostosis reconstruction with cranial vault expansion after ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rachana Tyagi
Keyword(s):  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Cranial Vault ◽  
Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Shunt Failure

scholarly journals Endoscopic third ventriculostomy has no higher costs than ventriculoperitoneal shunt

2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 524-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benicio Oton de Lima ◽  
Riccardo Pratesi
Keyword(s):  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Treatment Costs ◽  
Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
First Year ◽  
Shunt Failure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cost

Objective: To evaluate the cost of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of hydrocephalus in children. Method: We studied 103 children with hydrocephalus, 52 of which were treated with ETV and 51 with VPS in a prospective cohort. Treatment costs were compared within the first year after surgery, including subsequent surgery or hospitalization. Results: Twenty (38.4%) of the 52 children treated with VPS needed another procedure due to shunt failure, compared to 11 (21.5%) of 51 children in the ETV group. The average costs per patient in the group treated with ETV was USD$ 2,177,66±517.73 compared to USD$ 2,890.68±2,835.02 for the VPS group. Conclusions: In this series there was no significant difference in costs between the ETV and VPS groups.

ENDOSCOPIC THIRD VENTRICULOSTOMY (ETV) IS A BETTER ALTERNATIVE FOR VP SHUNT FAILURE IN NON-COMMUNICATING HYDROCEPHALUS

2021 ◽  
pp. 65-67
Author(s):  
Ramesh Tanger ◽  
Dinesh Kumar Barolia ◽  
Arka Chatterjee ◽  
Punit Singh Parihar ◽  
Arun Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Obstructive Hydrocephalus ◽  
Shunt Revision ◽  
Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Communicating Hydrocephalus ◽  
Shunt Failure ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Vp Shunt

CONTEXT: VP Shunt is most commonly used procedure for hydrocephalus but shunt failure is also the common complication in many patients. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is an accepted procedure for the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus. The aim of our study is to evaluate the success rate AIM AND OBJECTIVE - of ETV in patients of obstructive hydrocephalus formerly treated by ventriculo-peritoneal (VP shunt) shunt. The failure VP shunt was removed before ETV. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This study was conducted between June 2015 and December 2019 in single unit of our department. Twenty one (n=21) patients were enrolled for this study. All patients were admitted with failure of VP shunt. They were known case of non-communicating hydrocephalus previously operated for VP shunt. Six patients were excluded for ETV because CT/MRI show grossly distorted anatomy of ventricles. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy was attempted in 15 patients, but ventriculostomy was done successfully in 10 patients, rests were treated with revision of VP shunt. All patients in this study were radiologically diagnosed RESULTS: case of hydrocephalus due to aqueduct stenosis. They were experienced VP shunt insertion but there were failure of shunt due to any reason. ETV procedures were done successfully in 10 patients. Out of 10 patients one patient needed shunt insertion due ineffective ETV. Shunt revision was done in 11 patients. There was no serious complication during and after ETV procedures. The follow-up period of patients with successful ETV was 6–60 months. This follow-up was uneventful and peaceful for their parents. ETV can be considered as an alternative treatment for the patients w CONCLUSION: ith VP shunt failure with an acceptable success rate of 80%, although long-term follow-up is needed for these patients.

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt versus Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in the treatment of Obstructive Hydrocephalus in Pediatric Midline Posterior Fossa tumors

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Tarek ◽  
Hamdy Ibrahim ◽  
H Jalalod'din ◽  
SR Tawadros
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Obstructive Hydrocephalus ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Posterior Fossa Tumors ◽  
Shunt Insertion ◽  
Vp Shunt ◽  
Csf Diversion

Abstract Background Treatment of secondary hydrocephalus due to posterior fossa tumors in these children is still a matter of controversy, although preoperative ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VP shunt) insertion before tumor excision is widely accepted among neurosurgeons but many attempts are rising to minimize permanent VP shunt insertion and associated complications and introducing third endoscopic ventriculostomy (ETV) as one of the options of 2ry hydrocephalus. Objectives Comparing the post-operative clinical success with resolution of the manifestations and post-operative complications between endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt as different modes of CSF diversion in children with 2ry hydrocephalus due to midline posterior fossa tumors. Methods The following electronic databases were searched from June 2009 to june2019: PubMed, Google scholar search engine. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, EMBASE and science Direct, using the keywords ―hydrocephalus; posterior fossa tumors; pediatrics; ventriculoperitoneal shunt; endoscopic third ventriculostomy‖. Studies were eligible if they contain the target keywords in title or abstract, addressing the Pediatric age group with 2ry hydrocephalus due to de novo posterior fossa tumor manifested by signs of increase the intra cranial tension including persistent headache and vomiting, blurred vision, 6th nerve palsy, papilledema in fundus examination, acute DCL and 2ry hydrocephalus confirmed by brain imaging. Exclusion criteria included studies including age group below 1yr or above 18 yr, or patients with recurrent post fossa tumors and operated before or patients presented by failed previously attempt of CSF diversion. Results: A total of 1255 citations were screened for eligibility,6 studies were included in our systematic review discussing, comparing and evaluating the durability of ETV versus VP shunt in treatment the 2ry hydrocephalusdue to pediatric posterior fossa tumor.. Overall study population reached 474 patients. the overall clinical findings at presentation and postoperative outcomes regarding the clinical findings improvement, radiological improvement and postoperative complications between ETV and VP shunt are compared and showing that ETV should be considered as an alternative procedure to VP shunt in controlling severe hydrocephalus related to posterior fossa tumors to relieve symptoms quickly during the preoperative period when patients should wait for their definite tumor excision. Conclusion The shorter duration of surgery, the lower incidence of morbidity, the absence of mortality, the lower incidence of procedure failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy as compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and the significant advantage of not becoming shunt dependent make endoscopic third ventriculostomy to be recommended as the first choice in the treatment of pediatric patients with marked obstructive hydrocephalus due to posterior fossa tumors. It is a preliminary, simple, safe, effective, physiological, minimally invasive procedure for the relief of elevated intracranial pressure before direct tumor removal.

scholarly journals Early Outcome of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy With or Without Choroid Plexus Cauterization and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt as Primary Treatment of Hydrocephalus in Infants With Myelomeningocele

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bamidele O Adebayo ◽  
Okezie Kanu ◽  
Olufemi B Bankole ◽  
Omotayo Ojo
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Choroid Plexus ◽  
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt ◽  
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Choroid Plexus Cauterization

Abstract INTRODUCTION Myelomeningocele is associated with hydrocephalus in 35% to 90% of cases. Hydrocephalus is usually treated with insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt. However, endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without choroid plexus cauterization is a viable alternative. METHODS A prospective longitudinal study from January 2016 to December 2018 on patients with myelomeningocele who presented to Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria and who had hydrocephalus.Informed consent for research and surgery were obtained. ETV with or without CPC or VPS was done with general anesthesia using standard operative techniques. Patients were followed up monthly for at least 6 mo. The surgery was adjudged failed if there was progressive head enlargement as well as other signs of hydrocephalus necessitating another surgery for hydrocephalus. RESULTS A total of 48 patients completed the study. A total of Six patients were lost to follow-up. Age range of the patients was 1 to 44 wk. A total of Five patients had ETV, 21 had ETV/CPC, and 22 patients had VPS. The mean OFC at the time of surgery were 45.3 cm and 44.9 cm for the endoscopic and VPS arms respectively. There were 2 (7.6%) cases of CSF leak in the endoscopic arm and 3 (13.6%) cases of wound dehiscence, with 1 (4.5%) case of CSF leak in the VPS arm. Mean age at surgery for ETV/CPC arm was 12.3 wand 11.5 wk for the VPS arm. Mean time to failure was 9.9 and 6.3 wk for endoscopic and VPS arms respectively. Four (80%) of the patients who had ETV had a successful outcome, 11 (52.3%) of those who had ETV/CPC had a successful outcome and 13 (59%) of those who had VPS had a successful outcome. At 6 mo follow up, overall success rate for the endoscopic arm was 57.6% and 59% for the VPS. CONCLUSION Endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without choroid plexus cauterization had similar success rate with VPS at 6 mos.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document