scholarly journals BUEN VIVIR – SUAS ORIGENS E CONSOLIDAÇÃO NA AMÉRICA DO SUL

Divers ! ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Helio Augusto Teixeira Silva ◽  
Kerley Dos Santos Alves
Keyword(s):  

O presente artigo trata do conceito de Buen Vivir que pode ser entendido como filosofia fluida de vida originada nos povos Andinos que consagrou a natureza como sujeita de direitos na Constituição do Equador em 2008. A abordagem dessa temática buscou verificar suas nuances e expansão junto às nações na América do Sul e ainda suas críticas em relação ao progresso tecnológico da humanidade em detrimento da natureza. Por meio de uma pesquisa bibliográfica e documental com análise de artigos científicos e livros e o estudo de autores como Alberto Acosta, Ferdinand Lassalle, Ronald Dworkin, Romeu Thomé, entre outros, foi avaliado o equilíbrio entre o progresso da humanidade e a preservação da natureza, de modo a compreender como o Buen Vivir tem sido incorporado na legislação brasileira. Foram analisados alguns princípios constitucionais e ambientais que se aplicam à matéria da proteção ambiental, que foram desenvolvidos e aperfeiçoados após as conferencias mundiais que trataram do meio ambiente. Ao final verificou-se que a Filosofia do Buen Vivir, também foi incorporada na Constituição brasileira e nas normas infraconstitucionais, com a criação de institutos que protegem a utilização indiscriminada dos recursos naturais, fazendo da natureza e do meio ambiente equivalentes na condição de sujeitos de direito no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro.Palavra-chave: Natureza; Legislação brasileira; Princípios constitucionais; desenvolvimento.

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (002) ◽  
pp. 179-189
Author(s):  
T. Vorotnikova
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturo Escobar
Keyword(s):  

<p class="p1"><span class="s2"><strong>Resumen </strong></span>| Este trabajo procura iniciar un diálogo entre los marcos de referencia del decrecimiento y el post-desarrollo, colocándolos dentro del campo más amplio de los discursos sobre las transiciones ecológica y de civilización, y procurando tender puentes entre propuestas emergentes del Norte y aquellas generadas en el Sur global<span class="s3"><strong>. </strong></span>Sostenemos que este diálogo no sólo puede ser mutuamente enriquecedor para ambos movimientos, sino también esencial para una efectiva política de transformación<span class="s3"><strong>. </strong></span>La primera parte de este trabajo presenta un panorama breve de los discursos de transición, particularmente en el Norte. La segunda parte discute de manera sucinta las principales tendencias en el post-desarrollo en América Latina, incluyendo el Buen Vivir, los derechos de la naturaleza, la crisis de la civilización, y el concepto de “alternativas <em>al </em>desarrollo”. Con estos elementos en la mano, la tercera parte intenta un diálogo preliminar entre el decrecimiento y el post-desarrollo; identifica puntos de convergencia y tensión, y termina bosquejando algunas áreas de investigación que podrían ser de particular interés para los estudiosos del decrecimiento.<strong></strong></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Cristina Acuña Bermeo ◽  
Efraín Naranjo Borja ◽  
Andrés Abad
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAIME ALBERTO MANCERA CASAS ◽  
ELEAZAR LÓPEZ HERNÁNDEZ ◽  
HERVÉ TREMBLAY ◽  
FERNANDO TORRES MILLÁN ◽  
MARY BETTY RODRÍGUEZ MORENO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Kristi A. Olson

What is a fair income distribution? The empirical literature seems to assume that equal income would be fair, but the equal income answer faces two objections. First, equal income is likely to be inefficient. This book sets aside efficiency concerns as a downstream consideration; it seeks to identify a fair distribution. The second objection—pointed out by both leftist political philosopher G. A. Cohen and conservative economist Milton Friedman—is that equal income is unfair to the hardworking. Measuring labor burdens in order to adjust income shares, however, is no easy task. Some philosophers and economists attempt to sidestep the measurement problem by invoking the envy test. Yet a distribution in which no one prefers someone else’s circumstances to her own, as the envy test requires, is unlikely to exist—and, even if it does exist, the normative connection between the envy test and fairness has not been established. The Solidarity Solution provides a novel answer: when someone claims that her situation should be improved at someone else’s expense, she must be able to give a reason that cannot be rejected by a free and equal individual who regards everyone else as the same. Part I develops the solidarity solution and shows that rigorous distributive implications can be derived from a relational ideal. Part II uses the solidarity solution to critique the competing theories of Ronald Dworkin, Philippe Van Parijs, and Marc Fleurbaey. Finally, part III identifies insights for the gender wage gap and taxation.


Author(s):  
Michael Freeman

Despite the development of the children’s rights movement, human rights scholarship continues to overlook the rights of children. Even those like Ronald Dworkin, who proclaim the need to take rights seriously, are curiously silent, even ambivalent, when it comes to children. This inattention often forces advocates of children’s rights to the margins of human rights scholarship. In the few places where serious philosophical discussion of children’s rights does take place, the analysis intends to diminish the value of rights for children. These critics are not malevolent, and typically want what is best for children, but they do not think it can be accomplished through a children’s rights agenda. This chapter lays out a persuasive argument for a children’s rights agenda, or, for taking children’s rights seriously. Drawing from philosophy, history, literature, popular media, and of course the law, this chapter argues against the conventional deficit view underlying most arguments against the recognition of children’s rights and makes a case for the importance of children’s rights where rights are the currency in use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-90
Author(s):  
KNUT TRAISBACH

AbstractBeyond setting the stage, the Introduction makes three claims about the conceptual triangle of the rule of law, judicial authority and legitimacy. The first is that all three are essentially contested and interpretive concepts in the sense of Walter B. Gallie and Ronald Dworkin. In their expositions, the contested and interpretative nature of such concepts is nothing to be ‘solved’, rather the formulation of different conceptions and contestation about them are central functions of such concepts. The interpretive and essentially contested nature points us to the relevant ‘actors’ and to conflicts and trade-offs between contested competencies. Thus the second point is that arguments about the rule of law and judicial legitimacy are often a means of questioning or securing the authority of a particular actor or institution in relation to other actors and institutions. The final point is that transposing concepts from the domestic to the supranational is a constructive endeavour because it entails creating new conceptions and substituting old ones as well as legitimising new authorities and delegitimising old ones. Thus, this special issue also cautions against discourses that ultimately are more about legitimation than about legitimacy and more about new ways of ruling than the rule of law.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0094582X2110049
Author(s):  
Alejandra Carreño-Calderón

The current Chilean health model seeks to promote health equity among indigenous peoples by means of state intercultural health programs. As implemented regionally, these have been widely criticized as depoliticizing mechanisms meant to dominate the indigenous population. Study of the experiences of several indigenous health agents and associations fostered by these programs reveals that the strategic use of the concept of living well by indigenous peoples raises questions about the issues that are to be included in or excluded from the intercultural medical field. El actual modelo de salud chileno busca promover el acceso equitativo a la salud entre los pueblos indígenas a través de programas estatales de salud intercultural. Tal y como se aplican a nivel regional, estos han sido ampliamente criticados como mecanismos de despolitización diseñados para dominar a la población indígena. El estudio de las experiencias de varios agentes y asociaciones de salud indígenas impulsados por estos programas revela que el uso estratégico del concepto del buen vivir por parte de los pueblos indígenas plantea interrogantes sobre qué asuntos deben o no incluirse en el campo médico intercultural.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document