scholarly journals Applicability of the medication level variability index (MLVI) in adult hepatic transplantation and association with graft rejection rates

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Yakime de Brito Adrião ◽  
Mário Reis Álvares da Silva ◽  
Alexandre de Araújo ◽  
Soraia Arruda ◽  
Paola Hoff Alves

Introduction: Calculation of the Tacrolimus variation index by using the MLVI (Medication Level Variability Index) is set in pediatric liver transplant patients, and it is useful in controlling treatment adherence by associating MLVI values > 2.5 to acute graft liver rejection. Purpose: To verify the association between MLVI values and rejection in adult liver transplant patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including liver transplant patients over 18 years of age from December 2012 to December 2017 using orally tacrolimus. For MLVI calculation, tacrolimus serum level outpatient samples were used after 1 year of transplantation. Results: A total of 125 patients were transplanted, of which 86 met criteria for inclusion in the study. The most frequent reason for transplantation was C virus infection (55.8%, n = 48). Rejection was identified in 18.6% of patients (n = 16). The mean MLVI among rejection and nonrejection patients was 2.5 and 2.1 respectively (RR = 0.95, CI: 0.4-2.1, p = 0.57). The frequency of non-immunological complications was 56.2% (n = 9) in patients with rejection versus 62.8% (n = 44) in patients without rejection, most of them with recurrence of virus C (56,8%, n = 25). Conclusion: Although the mean value of MLVI was higher in patients with rejection, our data showed no statistical difference between both groups, which differs from previous studies in pediatric patients. A higher number of nonimmune complications were observed in patients without rejection. The findings suggest that new MLVI cutoffs should be explored in the adult population.

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon D. MacFarlane ◽  
Raman Venkataramanan ◽  
Sue V. McDiarmid ◽  
John D. Pirsch ◽  
Daniel G. Scheller ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Karti ◽  
Ozlem B Selver ◽  
Eyyup Karahan ◽  
Mehmet O Zengin ◽  
Murat Uyar

Purpose : To evaluate the normal distribution of exophthalmometric values in Turkish adult population and the effect of age, gender, refractive status and axial length on globe position. Methods : One hundred and twenty-two males and 114 healthy females with age ranging from 18 to 87 years were included in the study. The study population was recruited from patients presenting to our institution for routine refractive examination. Hertel exophthalmometer was used to measure the degree of ocular protrusion. Effect of age, refractive error, interpupillary distance, and axial length on globe position was detected with linear regression analyses. Results : The mean Hertel exophthalmometric size was 15.7+2.6 mm (range; 11 to 21 mm). The mean value for males was 16.1±2.6 mm (range; 11 to 21 mm), and for females 15.5±2.6 mm (range; 11 to 20 mm). The mean distance between the lateral rims of the orbit was 102 + 5.1 mm (range; 88 to 111mm). The mean exophthalmometric values were not statistically different in males and females. Age and mean spherical equivalents were negatively correlated with exophthalmometric measurements. Axial length was positively correlated with exophthalmometric measurements. Conclusion : The exophthalmometric measurement of the eye is affected by the age, spherical equivalent and the axial length. Standard normative values of the Hertel exophthalmometric measurements should be reevaluated with larger samples.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
AnaMaria Koehl ◽  
Magdelenis Gongora ◽  
Alvaro Coronado Munoz ◽  
Jennifer Garcia ◽  
Monica Alba Sandoval ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald D. Holmes ◽  
Kathy Orban-Eller ◽  
Frederick R. Karrer ◽  
David T. Rowe ◽  
Michael R. Narkewicz ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1328-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUE V. McDIARMID ◽  
JOHN O. COLONNA ◽  
ABRAHAM SHAKED ◽  
JORGE VARGAS ◽  
MARVIN E. AMENT ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document