scholarly journals Communication patterns in coordinated care planning conferences with older patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyra Graaf ◽  
Annica Kihlgren ◽  
Margareta Ehnfors ◽  
Karin Blomberg
Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2047-2055
Author(s):  
Ann‐Therese Hedqvist ◽  
Sandra Pennbrant ◽  
Margareta Karlsson

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk Overbeek ◽  
Ida J Korfage ◽  
Bernard J Hammes ◽  
Agnes van der Heide ◽  
Judith A C Rietjens

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S6-S7
Author(s):  
J.A. Janssen ◽  
M.A. Spruit ◽  
J.M.G.A. Schols ◽  
E.F.M. Wouters

Author(s):  
Julian C. Hughes

Ethical issues in older patients often arise in the context of physical and mental frailty. Professionals should be alert to the possibility that, on the grounds of frailty, the older patient’s personhood is undermined. It can often seem as if physical or mental dependence makes this inevitable and stigma results. But there are ways in which the person’s autonomy can be enhanced by those who provide care. Advance care planning is intended to preserve the person’s autonomy, but may not do so if care practices are poor. When it comes to consent, the issue of capacity is crucial. But evaluative judgements are required in assessments of capacity, as indeed they are when it comes to diagnoses of dementia or even of mild cognitive impairment. What we really need are broad judgements of best interests, which should be predicated on broad conceptions of the person as a situated embodied agent.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libby Kalucy

The current trials of coordinated health care are aimed at changing health service delivery to be more patient-focussed, through care planning and funds pooling. The strategies being implemented with patients with a variety of chronic conditions include creating more supportive environments, developing personal skills and re-orientation of health services.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Manasi A. Tirodkar ◽  
Sarah Hudson Scholle

50 Background: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model of care is being widely adopted as a way to provide accessible, proactive, coordinated care and self-care through primary care practices. During active treatment for cancer, the oncology practice is often the primary setting supporting the patient and coordinating cancer treatment. For this project, we are implementing a Patient-centered Oncology Care model in five oncology practices and evaluating the impact on cost, quality, and patient experiences. Methods: To determine the structures and processes present in the practices at baseline, we conducted a self-assessment on the standards, followed with an on-site “audit” for compliance with the standards. To get a sense for organizational culture and motivation to change, we conducted site visits which included interviews with providers, staff and patients and observation of clinical encounters and workflow. Results: Among the highest priority structures and processes, the most common were telephone triage, symptom management, advance care planning, and the use of evidence-based guidelines. The least common were patient/family orientation, availability of same day appointments, discussion and documentation of goals of therapy, symptom assessment, and tracking of appointments. All of the practices had made patient-centered care a priority and staff were motivated to change. There was variation in the way providers and the care team used health information technology during clinical workflow. There was also variation in which staff coordinated care for patients and whether or not financial counseling was offered. All of the practices stated that they needed to work on implementing survivorship care planning, shared decision-making, and patient engagement in quality improvement and practice transformation Conclusions: The pilot oncology practices have many structures and processes in common. However, there is little standardization within practices in the way these processes are established and documented. Practices vary in how they are implementing patient-centered care processes. However, with motivation to change, staff and providers are actively engaged in the transformation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document