scholarly journals Investigating CFTR gene variations in patient groups with positive newborn screening test results and preliminary clinical diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in the eastern anatolia region of Turkey

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 293
Author(s):  
Ayberk Turkyilmaz ◽  
Oguzhan Yarali
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Chudleigh ◽  
Holly Chinnery

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis has resulted in diagnosis often before symptoms are recognised, leading to benefits including reduced disease severity, decreased burden of care, and lower costs. The psychological impact of this often unsought diagnosis on the parents of seemingly well children is less well understood. The time during which the screening result is communicated to families but before the confirmatory test results are available is recognised as a period of uncertainty and it is this uncertainty that can impact most on parents. Evidence suggests this may be mitigated against by ensuring the time between communication and confirmatory testing is minimized and health professionals involved in communicating positive newborn screening results and diagnostic results for cystic fibrosis to families are knowledgeable and able to provide appropriate reassurance. This is particularly important in the case of false positive results or when the child is given a Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis designation. However, to date, there are no formal mechanisms in place to support health professionals undertaking this challenging role, which would enable them to meet the expectations set out in specific guidance.


Pathology ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Bridget Wilcken ◽  
C.M. Mellis ◽  
S.J. Towns ◽  
A.R.D. Brown

NeoReviews ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e48-e50
Author(s):  
Adam Was ◽  
Henry C. Lee ◽  
Laura Marie Nally ◽  
Yassar Arain

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S9
Author(s):  
A. Sobczynska-Tomaszewska ◽  
M. Oltarzewski ◽  
K. Wertheim ◽  
A. Norek ◽  
K. Czerska ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Botti ◽  
Vito Terlizzi ◽  
Michela Francalanci ◽  
Daniela Dolce ◽  
Maria Chiara Cavicchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease affecting about 1:3000 newborns in Caucasian populations. The introduction of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF NBS) has improved the clinical outcomes of individuals with CF through early diagnosis and early treatment. NBS strategies have been implemented over time. CF NBS was introduced extensively in 1984 in Tuscany, a region with 3.7 million people, characterized by a high allelic heterogeneity of CFTR gene. Aim and methods The aim of the study is to present the results from 34 years (1984–2018) of CF NBS, retrospectively evaluating the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the tests. In particular, we studied the impact of the introduction of DNA molecular analysis in NBS in a region with high allelic heterogeneity, such as Tuscany. Results Over these 34 years, 919,520 neonates were screened, using four different NBS strategies. From 1984 to 1991, CF NBS was performed by the determination of albumin on dried meconium (sensitivity 68.75%; specificity 99.82%). Subsequently, the analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen on a blood spot was adopted as CF NBS protocol (sensitivity 83.33%; specificity 99.77%). From 1992 to 2010, this strategy was associated with lactase meconium dosage: IRT1/IRT2 + LACT protocol (sensitivity 87.50%; specificity 99.82%). From 2011, when the existing algorithm was integrated by analysis of CF causing variants of the CFTR gene (IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA protocol), a substantial improvement in sensitivity was seen (senisitivity 96.15%; specificity 99.75%). Other improved parameters with DNA analysis in the NBS programme, compared with the previous method, were the diagnosis time (52 days vs. 38 days) and the recall rate (0.58 to 0.38%). Conclusion The inclusion of DNA analysis in the NBS was a fundamental step in improving sensitivity, even in a region with high allelic variability.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S11
Author(s):  
A.M. Vernooij-van Langen ◽  
S.J. Reijntjens ◽  
S.M. van der Pal ◽  
J.G. Loeber ◽  
E. Dompeling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document