The benefit of nebulized magnesium sulphate therapy in patients with acute severe asthma: a scoping review

Author(s):  
Dr Qureshi ◽  
Urooj Fatima ◽  
Areena Akram
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Powell ◽  
Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona ◽  
John Lowe ◽  
Angela Boland ◽  
Stavros Petrou ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (12) ◽  
pp. 1301-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunit Singhi ◽  
Sudhanshu Grover ◽  
Arun Bansal ◽  
Kapil Chopra

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (03) ◽  
pp. 120-124
Author(s):  
Arif Zaheer ◽  
Husnul Hayat ◽  
Faryad Hussain ◽  
Rizwan Gohar ◽  
Agha Shabbir Ali

In children acute severe asthma is a serious condition. The inhaled route for drug delivery is not appropriate when only small respiratory gas volumes are shifted; the i.v. route may be associated with greater side effects. Magnesium sulphate IV has a place in acute asthma management because it is a mild bronchodilator, and has a stabilizing effect on the atria. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus intravenous aminophylline in acute attack of asthma. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Emergency Department of pediatric Duration: April 2017 to October 2017.Material & Methods: 60 cases were included in the study. They were randomly divided in two comparable groups. Children in group A ware treated with intravenous magnesium sulphate and group B with intravenous aminophylline. The efficacy of the drug was judged by the improvement in the sign observed like respiratory rate (less than 40 per minute), pulse rate(<100), oxygen saturation( above 90 %) assessed after the time period of three hours. Results: Effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulphate in acute attack of asthma was found in 28 cases in Group A (93.33%) and in 22 cases in Group B (73.33%) with p-value 0.03. However, 6.67% cases (2 cases) in Group A and 26.67% cases (8 cases) in Group B did not show effectiveness. Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate in managing case of acute severe asthma was better when compared with intravenous aminophylline.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-135
Author(s):  
Aswini Kumar Sahoo ◽  
SC Mohapatra

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v6i1.9609 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.6(1) 2015 134-135


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Greenberger

Potentially (near) fatal asthma (PFA) defines a subset of patients with asthma who are at increased risk for death from their disease. The diagnosis of PFA should motivate treating physicians, health professionals, and patients to be more aggressive in the monitoring, treatment, and control of this high-risk type of asthma. A diagnosis of PFA is made when any one of the following are present: (1) a history of endotracheal intubation from asthma, (2) acute respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.35) or respiratory failure from acute severe asthma, (3) two or more episodes of acute pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum from asthma, (4) two or more episodes of acute severe asthma, despite the use of long-term oral corticosteroids and other antiasthma medications. There are two predominant phenotypes of near-fatal exacerbations: “subacute” exacerbation and “hyperacute” exacerbation. The best way to “treat” acute severe asthma is 3‐7 days before it occurs (i.e., at the onset of symptoms or change in respiratory function) and to optimize control of asthma by decreasing the number of symptomatic days and the days and/or nights that require rescue therapy and increasing baseline respiratory status in “poor perceivers.” PFA is treated with a multifaceted approach; physicians and health-care professionals should appreciate limitations of pharmacotherapy, including combination inhaled corticosteroid‐long-acting β-agonist products as well as addressing nonadherence, psychiatric, and socioeconomic issues that complicate care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Stewart ◽  
Frank Kee ◽  
Nigel Hart

AbstractShielding during the coronavirus pandemic has highlighted the potential of routinely collected primary care records to identify patients with ‘high-risk’ conditions, including severe asthma. We aimed to determine how previous studies have used primary care records to identify and investigate severe asthma and whether linkage to other data sources is required to fully investigate this ‘high-risk’ disease variant. A scoping review was conducted based on the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Twelve studies met all criteria for inclusion. We identified variation in how studies defined the background asthma cohort, asthma severity, control and clinical outcomes. Certain asthma outcomes could only be investigated through linkage to secondary care records. The ability of primary care records to represent the entire known asthma population is unique. However, a number of challenges need to be overcome if their full potential to accurately identify and investigate severe asthma is to be realised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document