Boundary-Spanning Roles in a Research and Development Organization: An Empirical Investigation

1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 388-393
Author(s):  
Robert T. Keller ◽  
Winford E. Holland
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-43
Author(s):  
Adejompo Fagbohunka ◽  
Gbenga John Oladehinde

Abstract Subject and purpose of work: Investment in infrastructural facilities has the capacity to create an enabling environment to stimulate business and industrial activities. Nevertheless, there are a few studies on the impact of infrastructural facilities on industrial development in developing countries. The main aim of this study is to investigate the impact of infrastructural facilities on industrial development in Lagos State, Nigeria. Materials and methods: One hundred and three questionnaires were administered to the selected companies through the use of multi-stage sampling techniques across the industrial zones. The data collected were analysed using descriptive statistics while ANOVA, Stepwise Regression, and correlation were used to investigate the research hypothesis. Results: The research shows that the impact of infrastructure on research and development is poor, while the infrastructural impact on the ease of production is averagely significant. Using Stepwise regression, the study revealed that ease of production (89.7%), productivity (1.1%), and industrial expansion (1.5%) were the major areas of industrial development that were positively impacted while research and development and workers’ morale were not positively impacted. The result of Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient shows that a relationship exists between infrastructural facilities and industrial development of the Lagos region (r= 0.880; p-value=0.000) at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusions: The study concluded that adequacy of infrastructural facilities positively enhances and boosts the industrial potential of the study area.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-78
Author(s):  
Michaela Wilson

In March 2017, the European Commission conditionally approved the Dow/DuPont merger. It was found that the transaction would lead to the significant impediment of innovation competition in the crop protection industry, specifically in the markets for herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. As a result, the decision requires the divestiture of DuPont’s entire crop protection pipeline and global research and development organization. The aim of this article is to explore through patent analysis whether and to what extent the merging parties are competing in the relevant innovation spaces. The results are compared and contrasted to the findings of the Commission in the agricultural chemicals, seeds, and materials science markets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document