scholarly journals Innovation Effects in Dow/DuPont: A Patent Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-78
Author(s):  
Michaela Wilson

In March 2017, the European Commission conditionally approved the Dow/DuPont merger. It was found that the transaction would lead to the significant impediment of innovation competition in the crop protection industry, specifically in the markets for herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. As a result, the decision requires the divestiture of DuPont’s entire crop protection pipeline and global research and development organization. The aim of this article is to explore through patent analysis whether and to what extent the merging parties are competing in the relevant innovation spaces. The results are compared and contrasted to the findings of the Commission in the agricultural chemicals, seeds, and materials science markets.

Author(s):  
D.V. Belikov ◽  
E.S. Shishkin

The article provides an overview of some promising areas of research and development in the field of materials science and nanotechnology and the main scientific results obtained by the teams of the leading scientific schools of Russia, which received grants from the President of the Russian Federation in 2021.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley Odom ◽  

The laboratory notebook is the fundamental record for research and development. The emergence of cloud-based digital tools to replace or augment the laboratory notebook has shown promise for groups that are multidisciplinary, working asynchronously, or in multiple locations. This paper details a recent pilot study conducted by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) comparing an electronic lab notebook (ELN) with traditional paper lab notebooks (PLN), including members of SNL’s Primary Standards Laboratory (PSL). Partly motivated by a related pilot study conducted at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the focus of the present study was on the integrability of an ELN within the unique constraints of a national lab, including security protocols that limit cloud capabilities and limited WIFI. The study used Microsoft OneNote and commercially available mobile computing hardware. The pilot included 18 participants from the PSL, biosciences, and materials science/engineering labs. In addition to OneNote, participants were provided one of two options for a computer to be used as their note taking device (including a stylus). Usability and gap analyses, as well as interviews with pilot participants were conducted by members from Sandia’s human factors group. Findings from this study indicate that ELNs may be particularly useful for teams where sharing of procedures and results is important. Participants believed that use of the ELN increased organization of their work and facilitated reporting much more than paper lab notebooks (PLNs). Other benefits included searchability and capability for access on multiple devices. Many of the identified drawbacks were specific to the unique constraints of working at a national lab, but some constraints are more general (e.g. use of ELNs in wet labs where hazardous materials may be of concern). Overall, it was found with proper training, collaboration on best practices, and technical support, that ELNs appear to be a promising tool for modernizing recording practices in research. Some examples from PSL will be highlighted, including R&D for qualifying measurement systems, calibration processes, and procedures.


Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Alisher Ergashev

The selective use of chemical products plays an important role in increasing production, improving the quality of Queensland’s agricultural produce and enabling producers to earn reasonable returns on their investments. Effective pest management, therefore, helps deliver high quality, healthy and affordable food for all consumers. The efficiency of policy tools such as chemical use licensing hinges critically on supply-side knowledge levels. Although licence applications are available online, information can be difficult to find and often businesses need to contact the state authority to seek further assistance in completing their licence applications. The aim of this study is therefore to identify the benefits for the users of agricultural chemicals from improvements in licensing application process. Based on a rigorous literature review and statistical analysis of available data, this study modelled the per day/per application value of the use of crop protection products in Queensland. Results indicate a potential saving by farmers due to a faster process for chemical licence applications. Extreme values of these savings range from $87 thousand to $52 million per annum, with actual ones falling in between depending on the coincidence and level of individual risk factors. Since the chemicals subject to licensing are used beyond agriculture and are utilised not only for crop protection, the results of this analysis are thus underestimated, which implies even greater benefits for the economy. It therefore seems important to update the current licence application platform so that applicants can lodge their application in a more user-friendly and synchronised manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document