Job evaluation and Comparable Worth: Compensation theory Bases for Molding Job Worth.

1981 ◽  
Vol 1981 (1) ◽  
pp. 296-300
Author(s):  
Marc J. Wallace ◽  
Charles H. Fay
1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad T. Lewis ◽  
Cynthia Kay Stevens

In a study designed to examine the impact of knowledge of a job holder's gender and the dominant gender of a job evaluation committee on job evaluation ratings, knowledge of job holder gender was found to significantly bias committee ratings. The same position was rated more highly when it was held by a male than when it was held by a female, regardless of whether the job evaluation committee was dominated by males or females. This evidence of gender-based discrimination underscores the importance of maintaining anonymity of job holders when conducting job evaluation. Unavoidable bias, which may occur in smaller organizations where the identities of job holders are known, suggests that mandating job evaluation as a means of implementing of comparable worth may be only a partial solution at best.


ILR Review ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 806-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jane Arnault ◽  
Louis Gordon ◽  
Douglas H. Joines ◽  
G. Michael Phillips

1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen LaVan ◽  
Marsha Katz ◽  
Maura S. Malloy ◽  
Peter Stonebraker

Various approaches have been developed as methods to reduce comparable worth differences. These include judicial (increased enforcement, lawsuits, and legislation), interest group activities (collective bargaining, non-unionized negotiations, and public awareness activities), and actions of public administrators (job evaluations and voluntary pay adjustments). However, the number of comparable worth lawsuits against public sector organizations continues to increase. This study compares public sector litigation to that which occurred in the private sector. Findings include that private sector organizations have moved towards the more quantitative job evaluation methods and away from the job classification method, which public sector employers in the litigated cases used. While pay was of focal interest in the public sector, judgments tended not to support the awarding of monetary compensation in the public sector. The issue of lack of training opportunities was more prevalent as a basis for litigations in the private sector, but litigation with respect to promotion was found only in public sector cases.


ILR Review ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 806 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jane Arnault ◽  
Louis Gordon ◽  
Douglas H. Joines ◽  
G. Michael Phillips

1987 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Tompkins

1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Booker ◽  
L. Camille Nuckolls

This paper takes a comprehensive look at the controversial issue of “comparable worth.” The effects of congressional legislation, the courts' interpretation of that legislation, job evaluation techniques, and marketplace value of jobs are discussed and evaluated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document