Withstanding Moral Disengagement: Ethical Self-Efficacy as Moderator in Misbehavior Routinization

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 11307
Author(s):  
Roberta Fida ◽  
Marinella Paciello ◽  
Irene Skovgaard-Smith ◽  
Claudio Barbaranelli ◽  
Gian Vittorio Caprara
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moral Disengagement

Defending victims of cyberbullying: The role of self-efficacy and moral disengagement

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay Bussey ◽  
Aileen Luo ◽  
Sally Fitzpatrick ◽  
Kimberley Allison
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moral Disengagement

scholarly journals Albert Bandura: December 4, 1925–July 26, 2021

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Robert A. C. Stewart ◽  
Sarah L. Krivan
Keyword(s):  
Social Behavior ◽  
Social Learning ◽  
Human Behavior ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moral Disengagement ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Albert Bandura

We note, with sadness, the passing of Dr Albert Bandura, pioneer of the theories of social learning and of self-efficacy, and of the concept of moral disengagement, whose research contributions informed current understanding of human behavior. Since 1992, Dr Bandura was a member of the Board of Consulting Editors of Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal.

scholarly journals Bystanders of bullying: Social-cognitive and affective reactions to school bullying and cyberbullying

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhea-Katharina Knauf ◽  
Heike Eschenbeck ◽  
Michael Hock
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moral Disengagement ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
School Context ◽  
Outcome Expectations ◽  
School Bullying ◽  
Affective Reactions ◽  
Intervention Model ◽  
The Social ◽  
Significant Difference

The Bystander Intervention Model by Latané and Darley (1970) describes the stages necessary for a bystander to intervene in an emergency and can be used to explain bystander behavior in the case of bullying. Social-cognitive and affective reactions to bullying such as empathy with the victim, moral disengagement, feelings of responsibility, defender self-efficacy and outcome expectancy are supposed to determine whether a bystander passes through all stages of the intervention model and are thereby crucial for the behavioral response. These mental reactions were compared between school bullying and cyberbullying in a sample of 486 German students (56% girls, age: M = 12.95) from 28 classes with a newly developed questionnaire covering the five Social-Cognitive and Affective Reactions to Bullying (SCARB) for school context and cyber context separately. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit and internal consistency coefficients were acceptable to good. In line with our hypotheses, for cyberbullying as compared to school bullying students reported higher moral disengagement and lower feelings of responsibility and self-efficacy. However, no significant difference was found for empathy. The level of negative outcome expectations was lower for cyberbullying than for school bullying. Results confirm that the context of bullying matters for the social-cognitive and affective reactions of bystanders.

The Role of Moral Disengagement and Self-Efficacy in Cyberbullying

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay Bussey ◽  
Sally Fitzpatrick ◽  
Amrutha Raman
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moral Disengagement

Is a mindful worker more attentive? the role of moral self-efficacy and moral disengagement

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Zhenduo Zhang ◽  
Junwei Zheng ◽  
Bao Cheng ◽  
Jie Zhong
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Moral Disengagement ◽  
Moral Self
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document