scholarly journals Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device - A Single Centre Experience with Short-term Follow-up Results

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Ramesh Mahboobani ◽  
Wing Ho Chong ◽  
Samuel Siu Kei Lam ◽  
Jimmy Chi Wai Siu ◽  
Chong Boon Tan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Guzzardi ◽  
Carmelo Stanca ◽  
Paolo Cerini ◽  
Bruno Del Sette ◽  
Ignazio Divenuto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
E. Sala ◽  
G. Carosi ◽  
G. Del Sindaco ◽  
R. Mungari ◽  
A. Cremaschi ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose A long-lasting remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analogues (SAs) withdrawal has been described in some series. Our aim was to update the disease evolution after SAs withdrawal in a cohort of acromegalic patients. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 21 acromegalic patients previously included in a multicentre study (Ronchi et al. 2008), updating data at the last follow-up. We added further 8 patients selected for SAs withdrawal between 2008–2018. Pituitary irradiation represented an exclusion criterion. The withdrawal was suggested after at least 9 months of clinical and hormonal disease control. Clinical and biochemical data prior and after SAs withdrawal were analysed. Results In the whole cohort (29 patients) mean age was 50 ± 14.9 years and 72.4% were females. In 69% pituitary surgery was previously performed. Overall, the median time of treatment before SAs withdrawal was 53 months (IQR = 24–84). At the last follow up in 2019, 23/29 patients (79.3%) had a disease relapse after a median time of 6 months (interquartile range or IQR = 3–12) from the drug suspension, while 6/29 (20.7%) were still on remission after 120 months (IQR = 66–150). IGF-1 levels were significantly lower before withdrawal in patients with persistent remission compared to relapsing ones (IGF-1 SDS: -1.5 ± 0.6 vs -0.11 ± 1, p = 0.01). We did not observe any other difference between patients with and without relapse, including SAs formulation, dosage and treatment duration. Conclusion A successful withdrawal of SAs is possible in a subset of well-controlled acromegalic patients and it challenges the concept that medical therapy is a lifelong requirement.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002096964
Author(s):  
Kirill Gromov ◽  
Nanna H Sillesen ◽  
Thomas Kallemose ◽  
Henrik Husted ◽  
Henrik Malchau ◽  
...  

Background: Introduction of new implants should be monitored closely to capture any signs of compromising patient safety. Vitamin E infused highly-crosslinked polyethylene liners (VEPE) offer the potential for reduced wear. Highwall liners have been hypothesised to result in increased wear and potential liner fractures. The aim of this study was to determine the 3–7-year follow-up of highwall VEPE for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), focusing on liner-related complications. Methods: We included 1221 consecutive THA operations from July 2010 to May 2014 with minimum follow-up of 3 (3.1–6.8) years Data collected included demographics, implant data, complications, reoperations, and deaths. Data were cross-referenced with the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry in order to ensure validity and completeness. Acetabular shell position was measured using Martell Hip Analysis Suite in a subgroup of 931 THAs. Results: Cumulative stem revision and shell revision at 3-year follow-up was 3.4% and 0.4% respectively. There were no revisions due to liner failure. Reason for revision included 11 dislocations, 15 soft-tissue revisions for infection, 44 stem revisions of which 34 were periprosthetic fractures and 13 shell revisions of which 6 were combined shell and stem revisions. Conclusion: Early follow-up of VEPE liners for primary THA have not shown any revisions associated with liner failure. Continued monitoring of new materials are necessary to capture any signs of compromised patient safety.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Schmidt ◽  
KR Julian Chun ◽  
Buelent Koektuerk ◽  
Feifan Ouyang ◽  
Karl-Heinz Kuck

Background: Radiofrequency current ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) focuses on endocardial (endo) substrates. However, if endo RFA fails, an epi approach is a potential treatment option. We report a single centre experience of epi VT ablation. Patients and Methods: Between 06/2005 and 02/2008 42 pts (14 female, mean age 49 ± 18 years) underwent electroanatomical endo and epi mapping and ablation for intractable VT, syncope or VT storm with multiple ICD discharges. Pts with normal heart (n=7), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM; n=8), NICM (n=11), ARVD (n=8), LV-aneurysm (n=7) or sarcoidosis (n=1) were studied. Mean LV ejection fraction was 45±12%. 20/42 had had at least 1 previous ablation attempt for VT (range 1– 4 ablations). Acute success was defined as non-inducibility of the previously inducible VT. Chronic success was defined as recurrence of any VT. Results: Acute procedural success rate was 79% (30/38). In 4 pts VTs were not inducible during EPS. In 28/42 pts endo mapping revealed no pathologic potentials. In 23/38 pts and 7/38 the succesful RFC ablation site was epi and endo, respectively. In 9/38 pts endo ablation failed and VT could only be ablated from epi. Further 7/38 pts needed both endo and epi ablation. In In 4/8 failed ablations epi RFC ablation was impossible due to failed access to target site (adhesions; n=2), close vicinity of a coronary artery (n=1) or the phrenic nerve (n=1). Procedure duration was 263±97 min. Unfortunately, 1 pt died due to perforation of RV and 1 pt had severe hepatic bleeding after epi puncture. One pt died in cardiogenic shock 1 d after the procedure. In 2 pts a sterile pericarditis occurred which resolved without any further intervention. After a median follow-up of 293 days (1–929 days) 53% of pts were alive and free from any VT. Conclusion: In pts with failed endo RFC ablation for VT due to different etiologies epi RFC ablation was acutely successful in 61% of pts with a moderate chronic success rate. However, major complications occured in approximately 5% of pts. Epi mapping should be considered if endo pathologic potentials are absent or if endo ablation failed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document