scholarly journals CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECT FOR PERIODIC SAFETY REVIEW OF AGING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN KOREA

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-548
Author(s):  
Tae-Eun Jin ◽  
Heui-Young Roh ◽  
Tae-Ryong Kim ◽  
Young-Sheop Park
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Safety Review ◽  
Periodic Safety

Development of “Proactive Safety Review Guideline for Continuous Improvement on Nuclear Power Plants”

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Narumiya ◽  
Koji Okamoto ◽  
Shingo Ueno ◽  
Kentaro Hayashi ◽  
Takahiro Kuramoto
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Improvement ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Technical Committee ◽  
Periodic Review ◽  
Safety Review ◽  
Safety Improvement ◽  
Periodic Safety ◽  
Proactive Safety

The Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) has established and issued the “Proactive Safety Review (PSR+) Guideline for Continuous Improvement on Nuclear Power Plants: 2015” 1) through the discussion at the Periodic Safety Review Subcommittee under the System Safety Technical Committee of the AESJ Standards Committee (SC), and then approved by the both committees. This guideline defines the review concept, perspectives, and methodologies, relating to identifying areas of safety improvement when the licensees implement periodic review for continuous improvement of safety of their nuclear power plants, so called “Proactive Safety Review (PSR+). This paper discusses the details of this newly established standard, including the concept, perspectives, and methodologies, relating to identifying areas of safety improvement. In addition, specific examples of applying this standard and the policy of utilizing this standard in continuously improving the safety of all the nuclear power plants in Japan are also described.

The Regulatory Framework for Safe Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants in Korea

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangmyeon Ahn ◽  
Jungjoon Lee ◽  
Chanwoo Jeong ◽  
Kyungwoo Choi
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Nuclear Facilities ◽  
Safety Requirement ◽  
Regulatory Review ◽  
Safety Standards

We are having 23 units of nuclear power plants in operation and 5 units of nuclear power plants under construction in Korea as of September 2012. However, we don’t have any experience on shutdown permanently and decommissioning of nuclear power plants. There are only two research reactors being decommissioned since 1997. It is realized that improvement of the regulatory framework for decommissioning of nuclear facilities has been emphasized constantly from the point of view of IAEA’s safety standards. It is also known that IAEA will prepare the safety requirement on decommissioning of facilities; its title is the Safe Decommissioning of Facilities, General Safety Requirement Part 6. According to the result of IAEA’s Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) mission to Korea in 2011, it was recommended that the regulatory framework should require decommissioning plans for nuclear installations to be constructed and operated and these plans should be updated periodically. In addition, after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan in March of 2011, preparedness for early decommissioning caused by an unexpected severe accident became important issues and concerns. In this respect, it is acknowledged that the regulatory framework for decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Korea need to be improved. First of all, we focus on identifying the current status and relevant issues of regulatory framework for decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the IAEA’s safety standards in order to achieve our goal. And then the plan is established for improvement of regulatory framework for decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Korea. It is expected that if the things will go forward as planned, the revised regulatory framework for decommissioning could enhance the safety regime on the decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Korea in light of international standards.

The Integrated Aging Management System Applied to Nuclear Power Plants in Korea

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se-Youl Won ◽  
Kyeong-Soo Lee ◽  
Jae-Gon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Management System ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Operating Experience ◽  
Evaluation Report ◽  
Time Operation ◽  
Standard Guideline ◽  
Periodic Safety ◽  
Long Time

According to Post Fukushima action items in Korea, KHNP has established the integrated aging management system to reinforce aging management of system, structures, and components (SSCs) effectively for seven operating units, which are in service for more than twenty years, and for Kori Unit 1 and Wolsung Unit 1, which are subject to continued operation (CO) based on NUREG-1801 GALL report. KHNP’s integrated aging management programs (AMPs) focus on the establishment of aging management system for long-lived operation of nuclear power plants in Korea. The integrated aging management system consists of the integrated AMP standard guideline, operating guideline for each plant, individual AMPs of each plant, and AMP Data Base (DB) system including implementation results, basic DB information related to facilities operating in NPPs, and operating information such as operating experience and evaluation report. The integrated aging management system is importantly utilized for Periodic Safety Review (PSR) and the renewal of CO. Therefore, it will be largely contributed to keep NPPs the level of safety for long time operation through the effective aging management.

Comparison of Plant Life Management Approaches for Long Term Operations

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Nuzzo ◽  
Ki-Sig Kang
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Member States ◽  
Safety Review ◽  
Term Operation ◽  
Life Management ◽  
Design Life ◽  
Plant Life

Many Member States of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have given high priority to long term operation of nuclear power plants beyond the timeframe originally anticipated (e.g. 30 or 40 years). Out of a total of 445 (369 GWe) operating nuclear power plants, 349 units (297 GWe) have been in operation for more than 20 years (as of November 2011) and many are engaged in investigations and studies aimed at prolonging the plant service life. The need for engineering support to operation, maintenance, safety review and life management for long term operation as well as education and training on LTO issues is increasingly evident. Plant life management (PLiM) techniques that can be defined as the integration of ageing and economic planning, have been used in operating nuclear power plants to maintain a high level of safety, optimize performance and justify long term operation (LTO) beyond the plant design life. In addition, as a follow up to the Fukushima accident, operators have become even more attentive to beyond design basis measures in the preparation of their plants for operation beyond their design life. In many countries, the safety performance of NPPs is periodically assessed and characterized via the periodic safety review (PSR) process. Regulatory review and acceptance of PSRs constitutes for these countries the licensing requirement for continued operation of the plant to the following PSR cycle (usually 10 years). In the USA and in other countries operating US designed plants, instead of a PSR process, a license renewal application (LRA) process is followed, which requires certain pre-requisites such as ageing management programmes, particularly for passive irreplaceable systems structures and components (SSCs). Active components are normally addressed via the maintenance rule (MR) requirements and other established regulatory processes. A third group of Member States have adopted a combined approach that incorporates elements of both the PSR process and selected LRA specific requirements, such as time limited ageing analysis. Taking into account this variety of approaches, the IAEA initiated work to collect and share information among Member States on good practices in plant life management for long term operation in nuclear power plants, by comparing the various approaches to the PSR reference and by drawing lessons learned from relevant applications and experiences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document