Surgical vs. Nonsurgical Management for Humeral Shaft Fractures; Preference Among Orthopaedic Surgeons
Background. Determining trends in managing humeral shaft fractures may help identify variation in practice which might benefit design of clinical guidance. We aimed to determine the practice of members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) in managing humeral shaft fractures. Methods and materials. An electronic survey was sent to members of BESS. Questions related to preferred surgical and nonsurgical approaches for management of humeral shaft fractures. This was divided into management of proximal, middle and distal third diaphyseal fractures. Results. 91 fully completed responses were analysed. Nonsurgical management was preferred by 90.1% (n=82) for middle-third and 80.2 % (n=73) for proximal third fractures but there was an almost even split in favouring surgical (52.7%, n=48) and nonsurgical (42.8%, n=39) treatment for distal third fractures. There was great variation in how to deal with a humeral shaft fracture associated with radial nerve palsy with an almost equal divide between those favouring a surgical and nonsurgical approach for mid-shaft or distal third fractures. Conclusions. 1. The management preference for humeral shaft fractures amongst surgeons is highly variable. 2. This may be partly attributed to the sparsity of high-quality evidence. 3. Well-designed randomised trials or prospective cohort studies may help further guide management of these injuries.