scholarly journals Transitions of Surgical Education and Training, Japan, EU and North America

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-151
Author(s):  
Munenori Uemura
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Surgical Education ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
And Training

eSurgery - Digital Transformation in Surgery, Surgical Edu-cation and Training: Survey Analysis of the Status Quo in Germany. (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliane Kröplin ◽  
Tobias Huber ◽  
Christian Geis ◽  
Benedikt Braun ◽  
Tobias Fritz
Keyword(s):  
Big Data ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Surgical Education ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Simulator Training ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Teaching Content ◽  
E Learning ◽  
And Training

UNSTRUCTURED Objective In surgery electronic healthcare systems offer numerous options to improve patient care. Aim of this study was to analyse the current status of digitalisation and its influence in surgery, with a special focus on surgical education and training. Methods An individually created questionnaire was used to analyse the subjective assessment of the digitalisation processes in clinical surgery. The online questionnaire consisted of 16 questions regarding the importance and the corresponding implementation of the teaching contents: big data, health apps, messenger apps, telemedicine, data protection/IT security, ethics, simulator training, economics and e-learning were included. The participation link was sent to members of the German Society of Surgery via the e-mail distribution list. Results In total, 119 surgeons (response rate = 19.8 %) took part in the survey. 18.5 % of them were trainees (TR). 81.5 % had already completed specialist training (SP). 66.4 % confirm a positive influence of digitalisation on the quality of patient care. The presence of a surgical robot was confirmed by 47.9 % of the participants. 22.0 % (n=26) of the participants confirm the possibil-ity of using virtual simulators. According to 79.0 % of the participants, the integration of digital technologies in surgical education for basic and advanced stage surgeons should be aimed for. Data protection (1.7) and e-Learning (1.7) were rated as the most important teaching content. The greatest discrepancy between importance and implementation was seen in the teaching content of big data (mean: 2.2 to 3.8). Conclusion The results of the survey reveal the particular importance of digitalisation content for surgery, surgical education and training. At the same time, the results underline the desire for in-creased integration of digital competence teaching. The data also show an overall more pro-gressive and optimistic perception of TR. In order to meet the challenges of the digital trans-formation, the implementation of suitable curricula, including virtual simulation-based training and blended-learning teaching concepts should be emphasized.

European Surgical Education and Training in Gynecologic Oncology: The impact of an Accredited Fellowship

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 819-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Chiva ◽  
Jose Mínguez ◽  
Denis Querleu ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Andreas du Bois
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Training ◽  
Surgical Education ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Management Of Complications ◽  
Urinary Reconstruction ◽  
The Impact ◽  
And Training

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to understand the current situation of surgical education and training in Europe among members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) and its impact on the daily surgical practice of those that have completed an accredited fellowship in gynecologic oncology.MethodsA questionnaire addressing topics of interest in surgical training was designed and sent to ESGO members with surgical experience in gynecologic oncology. The survey was completely confidentially and could be completed in less than 5 minutes. Responses from 349 members from 42 European countries were obtained, which was 38% of the potential target population. The respondents were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had undergone an official accreditation process.ResultsTwo thirds of respondents said they had received a good surgical education. However, accredited gynecologists felt that global surgical training was significantly better. Surgical self-confidence among accredited specialists was significantly higher regarding most surgical oncological procedures than it was among their peers without such accreditation. However, the rate of self-assurance in ultraradical operations, and bowel and urinary reconstruction was quite low in both groups. There was a general request for standardizing surgical education across the ESGO area. Respondents demanded further training in laparoscopy, ultraradical procedures, bowel and urinary reconstruction, and postoperative management of complications. Furthermore, they requested the creation of fellowship programs in places where they are not now accredited and the promotion of rotations and exchange in centers of excellence. Finally, respondents want supporting training in disadvantaged countries of the ESGO area.ConclusionsSpecialists in gynecologic oncology that have obtained a formal accreditation received a significantly better surgical education than those that have not. The ESGO responders recognize that their society should lead the standardization of surgical training and promote ways of improving members’ surgical skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document