scholarly journals Consolidation: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Keklik Karadağ ◽  
Fahri Şahin ◽  
Güray Saydam

The goal of complete remission (CR) in acute leukemias could be achieved with intensive induction chemotherapy however patients need post remission consolidation strategies such as high-dose chemotherapy, or autologous (ASCT) or allogeneic (allo-SCT) hematopoetic stem cell transplantation for durable response. However, Allo-SCT is getting more attention in last decades because of improvements of conditioning regimens and graft versus host disease (GVHD) prohylaxis strategies and alternatively available donor sources, it is not suitable for all leukemia patients. The patients who would benefit from Allo-SCT or ASCT could be defined more easily by using risk stratification systems and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. ASCT is considered a treatment option even if its use is declining in the world. Herein, we tried to summarize the studies that report the outcomes of ASCT in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute, lymphoblastic leukemia and describe the patients who would be good candidate for ASCT.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3662-3662
Author(s):  
Khaled M. Ramadan ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Abdulwahab J. Al-Tourah ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
Kevin Song ◽  
...  

Abstract The effect of prior exposure to rituximab (ritux) on relapse (REL) and survival following stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients (pts) with REL composite low and intermediate grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (L/I-NHL) is unknown. Fifty-four pts with REL L/I-NHL underwent high-dose chemotherapy (CT) and SCT Jan ’89 to June ’05. Follow-up is complete to April ’6 with a median of 32 mo. Ritux was added to CT regimens since 2001 and given at 375 mg/m2. Eighteen pts received ritux at initial diagnosis of NHL or after REL with salvage CT prior to SCT. Pts proceeded to high dose CT with allogeneic (allo) (n=12) or autologous (auto) SCT (n=6). This group was compared with a group of pts not receiving ritux pre-SCT (n=36)(Table 1). Eleven pts (61%) are alive in the ritux group compared with 11 pts (31%) in the non-ritux group. The 2 and 4-y OS for pts who received ritux were 52% and 52%, vs 36% and 24% (p=.12, RR=.52) for pts who did not receive ritux. The EFS were significantly different with 2 and 4-y EFS for the ritux group 56% and 56% vs 24% and 18% (P=.038, RR=.42) for the non-ritux group (figure 1). No effect was seen on TRM. The risk of REL post SCT was significantly lower in the ritux group (p=.017)(figure 2). Two of 18 pts (11%) had NHL REL in the ritux vs 18 of 36 (50%) in the non-ritux group. The hazard rate of REL in pts who received ritux was 20% that of pts in the non-ritux group. Significance maintained in multivariate analysis (p=.016). No impact was seen on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Fifty percent and 61% of pts developed acute GVHD grades 2–4 and 50% and 64% of pts developed chronic GVHD in the ritux and non-ritux groups respectively. In conclusion, prior treatment with ritux in pts with relapsed composite L/I-NHL undergoing SCT was associated with reduced risk of REL and improved survival without associated increase in toxicity. Further analysis is underway to clarify the nature of this important finding. Table 1: Clinicopathological characteristics of ritux and non-ritux groups Parameter$ Rituximab group, n=18 (%) Non-rituximab group, n=36 (%) $ all p values are >0.1. *at diagnosis Median age at SCT 48 y 44 y M:F 2.6:1 1.6:1 Allo-SCT 12(67) 28(78) BM involvement* 10(56) 22(61) B symptoms* 7(39) 10(28) Prior purine analogue therapy 8(44) 11(31) Residual disease prior to SCT 9(50) 14(39) TBI in conditioning 13(72) 30(83) Figure Figure Figure Figure


2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1239-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy D Baynes ◽  
Caroline Hamm ◽  
Roger Dansey ◽  
Jared Klein ◽  
Lucinda Cassells ◽  
...  

Abstract This review focuses on certain of the principles involved in high-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy along with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of certain malignancies. In addition, the evidence, wherever possible based on randomized data, for the application of this approach in certain malignancies is reviewed. The malignancies highlighted include acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease, and breast cancer.


JBMTCT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-40
Author(s):  
Maura Rosane Valério Ikoma-Colturato

Minimal or measurable residual disease (MRD) is considered the most important independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MRD status after clinical remission has been used to establish the risk of relapse and therapeutic stratification, identifying patients who can benefit from therapeutic intensification, including allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). The pre alloSCT MRD also identifies patients eligible for transplant and those with low or high risk of relapse after transplantation, according to the level of MRD detected. However, MRD status post-alloSCT has been shown to be a more powerful predictor of relapse than pre-transplant MRD. In addition, it is important to take into account that there are some factors to be considered to better interpret MRD information, these include: the method used for MRD assessment and its sensitivity and specificity, which may vary according to each specific time point of evaluation; the treatment regimen used; and the identification of genetic lesions that combined with MRD information can further improve the management of patients with ALL.


2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy D. Baynes ◽  
Roger D. Dansey ◽  
Jared L. Klein ◽  
Caroline Hamm ◽  
Mark Campbell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 326-328
Author(s):  
Larisa Filatova ◽  
Yevgeniya Kharchenko ◽  
Sergey Alekseev ◽  
Ilya Zyuzgin ◽  
Anna Artemeva ◽  
...  

Currently there is no single approach to treatment for aggressive diffuse large-cell B-cell lymphoma (Double-HIT and Triple-HIT). Accumulated world data remain controversial and, given the unfavorable prognosis in this subgroup, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the first line of treatment is a therapeutic option.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. ii2-ii2
Author(s):  
Eisei Kondo

Abstract High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) is listed as a consolidation therapy option for primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma in the guidelines of western countries. The advantages of HDT-ASCT for primary CNS lymphoma as consolidation are believed to be high rates of long-term remission and lower neurotoxicity, even though its eligibility is limited to younger fit patients. In the Japanese guideline, HDT-ASCT for primary CNS lymphoma is however not recommended in daily practice, mainly because thiotepa was unavailable since 2011. The Japanese registry data for hematopoietic transplantation have shown that primary CNS lymphoma patients were treated with various HDT regimens and thiotepa-containing HDT was associated with better progression free survival (P=.019), lower relapse (P=.042) and a trend toward a survival benefit (Kondo E et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019). A pharmacokinetic study of thiotepa(DSP-1958) in HDT-ASCT for lymphoma was conducted in 2017, and thiotepa was approved for HDT-ASCT in lymphoma this March, meaning that optimal HDT regimen for CNS lymphoma is now available in Japan. The treatment strategy of CNS lymphoma needs further development to improve survival and reduce toxicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document