Keratoconus Treatment Toolbox: An Update

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vatookarn Roongpoovapatr ◽  
Mohamed Abou Shousha ◽  
Puwat Charukamnoetkanok
Keyword(s):  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Visual Rehabilitation ◽  
Intrastromal Corneal Ring ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Corneal Scar ◽  
Ring Segment ◽  
Collagen Cross Linking

Keratoconus is a bilateral, asymmetric, progressive disease of the cornea which can lead to visual impairment and blindness as irregular astigmatism increases and corneal scar occurs. Currently, many methods are available for a treatment of keratoconus. The treatment can help enhance visual rehabilitation and prevent progression in keratoconus patients. The treatment options included non-surgical and surgical managements. This review offers a summary of the current and emerging treatment options for keratoconus- eyeglasses, contact lens, corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), CXL Plus, intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS), Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (CAIRS), Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK), Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK), Bowman layer transplantation (BL transplantation) and gene therapy.

Toward Safer Treatment Options for Advanced Keratoconus

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Jack Parker ◽  
Ricarda M Konder ◽  
Korine van Dijk ◽  
Gerrit RJ Melles ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Visual Rehabilitation ◽  
Corneal Disease ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Irregular Astigmatism ◽  
Corneal Thinning

Keratoconus is a bilateral and progressive corneal disease characterized by a significant increase in irregular astigmatism and corneal thinning. Numerous treatments—including penetrating keratoplasty (PK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), ultraviolet-crosslinking (UV-CXL), and intracorneal ring segments—are available for halting progression and/or obtaining (partial) visual rehabilitation. Recently, midstromal Bowman layer transplantation has been introduced as a new treatment option for advanced keratoconus. This technique has shown significant promise in halting disease progression and postponing riskier procedures such as PK or DALK.

scholarly journals Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Astigmatism Correction after Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlio C. D. Arantes ◽  
Sandro Coscarelli ◽  
Paulo Ferrara ◽  
Luana P. N. Araújo ◽  
Marcos Ávila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contact Lenses ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Astigmatism Correction ◽  
Intrastromal Corneal Ring ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Ring Segment

Background. To evaluate the change in corneal astigmatism after intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus patients with previous deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Design was a longitudinal, retrospective, interventional study. The study included 25 eyes of 24 patients with keratoconus who had DALK performed at least two years prior to ICRS implantation. All patients had a clear corneal graft with up to 8.00 D of corneal astigmatism and intolerance to contact lenses. The studied parameters were age, sex, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry (K1), minimum keratometry (K2), spherical equivalent, and astigmatism. There was a statistically significant decrease in the postintervention analysis as follows: 3.5 D reduction in K1 (p<0.001); 1.53 D in K2 (p=0.005); and 2.52 D (p<0.001) in the average K. The spherical equivalent reduced from −3.67 D (±2.74) to −0.71 D (±2.35) (p<0.001). The topographic astigmatism reduced from 3.87 D preoperatively to 1.90 D postoperatively (p<0.001). The CDVA improved from 0.33 (±0.10) to 0.20 (±0.09, p<0.001). ICRS implantation is a useful option for the correction of astigmatism after DALK as it yields significant visual, topographic, and refractive results.

scholarly journals Recurrent Keratoconus

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-68
Keyword(s):  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Corneal Transplantation ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Time To Recurrence ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Corneal Thinning ◽  
Corneal Disorder

Abstract Keratoconus is an ectatic corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning and protrusion. Keratoconus recurrence after corneal transplantation although rare is present and has been confirmed histologically. Host, donor, genetic, mechanical and environmental factors have been proposed as predisposing factors to initiate keratoconus recurrence. The time-to-recurrence post-deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty seems to occur earlier than after penetrating keratoplasty. Wound dehiscence and high astigmatism post-transplant are plausible differential diagnosis for this entity. The treatment options are similar to primary keratoconus. Since, the era of collagen corneal cross-linking, early diagnosis is desirable as it could halt the progression of recurrent keratoconus. How to cite this article Barbara R, Barbara A. Recurrent Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2013;2(2):65-68.

scholarly journals Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of the Lamellar and Penetrating Keratoplasty Approaches in Patients with Keratoconus

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2421
Author(s):  
Dominika Janiszewska-Bil ◽  
Barbara Czarnota-Nowakowska ◽  
Katarzyna Krysik ◽  
Anita Lyssek-Boroń ◽  
Dariusz Dobrowolski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Cell Loss ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Endothelial Cell Loss ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Significant Difference

We compared the visual and refractive outcomes, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell loss (ECL), and adverse events in keratoconus patients after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) with the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) below 0.3 (logMAR 0.52). This is a prospective, comparative cohort study of 90 eyes (90 patients) with a clinical diagnosis of keratoconus. Patients underwent a complete eye examination before the surgical approach, 6 and 12 months postoperatively that consisted of BCVA, refractive astigmatism (AS), central corneal thickness (CCT), IOP, and ECL. Secondary outcomes were adverse events related to the surgical procedure. With lower ECL and less adverse events, DALK was revealed to be beneficial over PK with similar visual outcomes. Results: There was no significant difference between the BCVA in the DALK and PK groups (at 6 months: 0.49 ± 0.17 vs. 0.48 ± 0.17; p = 0.48; at 12 months: 0.54 ± 0.17 vs. 0.52 ± 0.14; p = 0.41). The mean value of AS was significantly lower after the PK procedure when compared to DALK, after both 6 and 12 months of follow up (p < 0.001). The CCT in the DALK group was significantly lower when compared to the PK group (at 6 months: 452.1 ± 89.1 µm vs. 528.9 ± 69.9 µm, p < 0.0001; at 12 months: 451.6 ± 83.5 µm vs. 525.5 ± 37.1 µm). The endothelial cell loss at 12 months after surgery was significantly lower after DALK when compared to PK (p < 0.0001). DALK transplantation should be considered as an alternative procedure in the surgical treatment of keratoconus.

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty as an Alternative to Penetrating Keratoplasty

Ophthalmology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Reinhart ◽  
David C. Musch ◽  
Deborah S. Jacobs ◽  
W. Barry Lee ◽  
Stephen C. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

scholarly journals Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus eyes with vernal keratoconjunctivitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142110105
Author(s):  
Sepehr Feizi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Javadi ◽  
Seyed-Mohamadmehdi Moshtaghion ◽  
Mohammad Abolhosseini
Keyword(s):  
Penetrating Keratoplasty ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis ◽  
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty ◽  
Disease Reactivation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to compare outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) against deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). Methods: Keratoconic patients with VKC who received PK ( n = 55, group 1) or DALK ( n = 62, group 2) were retrospectively enrolled. The Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test, Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, and Kaplan–Meier survival curve were used to compare outcomes between the groups. Results: The follow-up period was 59.4 ± 44.1 and 62.4 ± 38.9 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( p = 0.70). Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.24 ± 0.18 and 0.29 ± 0.19 logMAR, respectively ( p = 0.13). Graft rejection occurred in 34.6% and 25.8% of eyes in groups 1 and 2, respectively ( p = 0.30). Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in the rates of cataract (3.6% and 12.9%, respectively, p = 0.07) and high intraocular pressure (3.6% and 8.1%, respectively, p = 0.31). Compared with the eyes with inactive VKC, PK eyes that experienced postoperative disease reactivation had a higher rate of suture abscesses (10.9% versus 50.0%, respectively, p = 0.01) and suture-tract vascularization (6.5% versus 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.03). Similarly, disease reactivation significantly increased suture abscesses from 27.3% to 51.7% ( p = 0.03) and suture-tract vascularization from 18.2% to 49.6% ( p = 0.005) in the DALK group. The graft survival rates were 95.3% in group 1 and 87.9% in group 2 at the 4-year follow-up, with mean durations of 14.4 and 11.1 months, respectively ( p = 0.20). Conclusion: The results indicate no difference in outcomes between PK and DALK for keratoconus in patients with VKC. Postoperative VKC reactivation increased the rate of suture-related problems after both techniques of keratoplasty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document