scholarly journals Promoting Partnership between Urban Design and Urban Ecology through Social-Ecological Resilience Building

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Colding ◽  
Lars Marcus ◽  
Stephan Barthel

A closer partnership between urban design and urban ecology can yield new knowledge with the predictive advancement of both fields. However, achieving such partnership is not always a straight-forward process due to different epistemological departures. This chapter provides a rudimentary background of the fields of urban design and urban ecology and familiarizes readers with some epistemological characteristics that are useful to consider in all forms of partnership activities between designers and ecologists. Social-ecological resilience offers a useful framework for inquiry of particular relevance for urban transition at a time when global societal challenges of massive biodiversity loss and climate change require urgent attention and where wicked environmental problems require creative urban tinkering. Such a framework could open up for more dynamic research approaches with a greater potential to bridge the gap between design and ecology that has tended to be dominated by relatively static design approaches in the past, ignoring a more non-linear understanding of the interconnectedness of social and ecological systems. The chapter ends by focusing on some important determinants for cooperation and dealing with ‘Research Through Design(ing)’ as a viable methodology for transition to urban sustainability.

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mura Quigley ◽  
Neale Blair ◽  
Karen Davison

Author(s):  
Hallie Eakin ◽  
Helda Morales ◽  
Edwin Castellanos ◽  
Gustavo Cruz-Bello ◽  
Juan F. Barrera

AMBIO ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (S3) ◽  
pp. 287-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lemlem Aregu ◽  
Ika Darnhofer ◽  
Azage Tegegne ◽  
Dirk Hoekstra ◽  
Maria Wurzinger

2007 ◽  
Vol preprint (2007) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ioan Fazey ◽  
John A Fazey ◽  
Joern Fischer ◽  
Kate Sherren ◽  
John Warren ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margiana Petersen-Rockney ◽  
Patrick Baur ◽  
Aidee Guzman ◽  
S. Franz Bender ◽  
Adam Calo ◽  
...  

Humanity faces a triple threat of climate change, biodiversity loss, and global food insecurity. In response, increasing the general adaptive capacity of farming systems is essential. We identify two divergent strategies for building adaptive capacity. Simplifying processes seek to narrowly maximize production by shifting the basis of agricultural production toward centralized control of socially and ecologically homogenized systems. Diversifying processes cultivate social-ecological complexity in order to provide multiple ecosystem services, maintain management flexibility, and promote coordinated adaptation across levels. Through five primarily United States focused cases of distinct agricultural challenges—foodborne pathogens, drought, marginal lands, labor availability, and land access and tenure—we compare simplifying and diversifying responses to assess how these pathways differentially enhance or degrade the adaptive capacity of farming systems in the context of the triple threat. These cases show that diversifying processes can weave a form of broad and nimble adaptive capacity that is fundamentally distinct from the narrow and brittle adaptive capacity produced through simplification. We find that while there are structural limitations and tradeoffs to diversifying processes, adaptive capacity can be facilitated by empowering people and enhancing ecosystem functionality to proactively distribute resources and knowledge where needed and to nimbly respond to changing circumstances. Our cases suggest that, in order to garner the most adaptive benefits from diversification, farming systems should balance the pursuit of multiple goals, which in turn requires an inclusive process for active dialogue and negotiation among diverse perspectives. Instead of locking farming systems into pernicious cycles that reproduce social and ecological externalities, diversification processes can enable nimble responses to a broad spectrum of possible stressors and shocks, while also promoting social equity and ecological sustainability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document