scholarly journals Treatment Algorithm in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. From Protocols to the Real World

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesus Hernan Gonzalez-Cortes ◽  
Jesus Emiliano Gonzalez-Cantu ◽  
Aditya Sudhalkar ◽  
Sergio Eustolio Hernandez-Da Mota ◽  
Alper Bilgic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Microvascular Complications ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Clinical Feature ◽  
Vegf Inhibitors ◽  
Global Epidemic

Diabetes mellitus is a global epidemic that leads to multiple macrovascular and microvascular complications. The complex interrelated pathophysiological mechanisms triggered by hyperglycemia underlie the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a microvascular complication, considered the main cause of irreversible blindness in patients of productive age in the world. On the other hand, diabetic macular edema (DME) remains the clinical feature most closely associated with vision loss. In general, both manifestations are due to an increase in inflammatory factors, such as specific pro-inflammatory prostaglandins, interleukins and angiogenic substances including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Laser photocoagulation and VEGF inhibitors have been shown to be effective in the treatment of PDR and DME. Currently, randomized protocols suggest that VEGF inhibitors therapy could displace laser photocoagulation in the treatment of PDR with and without the presence of DME. The ongoing discussion still prevails about the different treatment modalities for both retinal manifestations in real-world settings.

Proteomic Analysis of the Vitreous Body in Proliferative and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van-An Duong ◽  
Jeeyun Ahn ◽  
Na-Young Han ◽  
Jong-Moon Park ◽  
Jeong-Hun Mok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Microvascular Complications ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Vitreous Body ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Alpha Beta ◽  
New Treatment

Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), one of the major microvascular complications commonly occurring in diabetic patients, can be classified into Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR). Currently available therapies are only targeted for later stages of the disease in which some pathologic changes may be irreversible. Thus, there is a need to develop new treatment options for earlier stages of DR through revealing pathological mechanisms of PDR and NPDR. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize proteomes of diabetic through quantitative analysis of PDR and NPDR. Methods: Vitreous body was collected from three groups: control (non-diabetes mellitus), NPDR, and PDR. Vitreous proteins were digested to peptide mixtures and analyzed using LC-MS/MS. MaxQuant was used to search against the database and statistical analyses were performed using Perseus. Gene ontology analysis, related-disease identification, and protein-protein interaction were performed using the differential expressed proteins. Results: Twenty proteins were identified as critical in PDR and NPDR. The NPDR group showed different expressions of kininogen-1, serotransferrin, ribonuclease pancreatic, osteopontin, keratin type II cytoskeletal 2 epidermal, and transthyretin. Also, prothrombin, signal transducer and activator of transcription 4, hemoglobin subunit alpha, beta, and delta were particularly up-regulated proteins for PDR group. The up-regulated proteins related to complement and coagulation cascades. Statherin was down-regulated in PDR and NPDR compared with the control group. Transthyretin was the unique protein that increased its abundance in NPDR compared with the PDR and control group. Conclusion: This study confirmed the different expressions of some proteins in PDR and NPDR. Additionally, we revealed uniquely expressed proteins of PDR and NPDR, which would be differential biomarkers: prothrombin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, hemoglobin subunit alpha, beta, and transthyretin.

scholarly journals A case of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in which scintillating particles appeared in the intravitreal cavity after laser photocoagulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryohsuke Kohmoto ◽  
Takatoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Takaki Sato ◽  
Daisaku Kimura ◽  
Masanori Fukumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation

Bevacizumab-Augmented Retinal Laser Photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Double-Masked Clinical Trial

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mirshahi ◽  
R. Roohipoor ◽  
A. Lashay ◽  
S.-F. Mohammadi ◽  
A. Abdoallahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Complete Regression ◽  
Standard Laser ◽  
Risk Characteristic

Purpose To evaluate the additional therapeutic effect of single intravitreal bevacizumab injection on standard laser treatment in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods A prospective, fellow-eye sham controlled clinical trial was conducted on 80 eyes of 40 high-risk characteristic proliferative diabetic retinopathy type II diabetics. All cases received standard laser treatment according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Avastin-assigned eyes received 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab (Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) on the first session of their laser treatments. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and at weeks 6 and 16, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy regression was evaluated in a masked fashion. Results The median age was 52 years (range: 39–68) and 30% of the participants were male. All patients were followed for 16 weeks. A total of 87.5% of Avastin-injected eyes and 25% of sham group showed complete regression at week 6 of follow-up (pp<0.005). However, at week 16, PDR recurred in a sizable number of the Avastin-treated eyes, and the complete regression rate in the two groups became identical (25%; p=1.000); partial regression rates were 70% vs 65%. In the subgroup of Avastin-treated eyes, multivariate analysis identified hemoglobin A1c as the strongest predictor of proliferative diabetic retinopathy recurrence (p=0.033). Conclusions Intravitreal bevacizumab remarkably augmented the short-term response to scatter panretinal laser photocoagulation in high-risk characteristic proliferative diabetic retinopathy but the effect was short-lived, as many of the eyes showed rapid recurrence. Alternative dosing (multiple and/or periodic intravitreal Avastin injections) is recommended for further evaluation.

Encircling panretinal laser photocoagulation may prevent macular detachment after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry L. Hudson ◽  
Lawrence P. Chong ◽  
Donald A. Frambach ◽  
Marcela Valencia ◽  
Ronald L. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Macular Detachment

A Clinical Study of Diabetic Retinopathy

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (148) ◽  
Author(s):  
KJD Karki
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Visual Loss ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Vitrectomy Surgery

A clinical study of diabetic retinopathy was conducted from March- May 2002 to diagnose a patient’sdiabetic retinopathy level and identify eyes of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy so thatthese patients could get appropriate and timely laser photocoagulation surgery and other surgical modalitiesto reduce the risk of visual loss. This study shows that out of 248 diabetic patients examined, 45.9% patientshad retinal changes. The potential candidates for panretinal and focal laser treatment were the patientswith very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (3.5%), early proliferative diabeticretinopathy (PDR) or high-risk PDR (3.5%), and maculopathy (8.8%).Key Words: Diabetic retinopathy, Laser photocoagulation surgery and vitrectomy Surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document