A Clinical Study of Diabetic Retinopathy

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (148) ◽  
Author(s):  
KJD Karki
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Visual Loss ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Vitrectomy Surgery

A clinical study of diabetic retinopathy was conducted from March- May 2002 to diagnose a patient’sdiabetic retinopathy level and identify eyes of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy so thatthese patients could get appropriate and timely laser photocoagulation surgery and other surgical modalitiesto reduce the risk of visual loss. This study shows that out of 248 diabetic patients examined, 45.9% patientshad retinal changes. The potential candidates for panretinal and focal laser treatment were the patientswith very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (3.5%), early proliferative diabeticretinopathy (PDR) or high-risk PDR (3.5%), and maculopathy (8.8%).Key Words: Diabetic retinopathy, Laser photocoagulation surgery and vitrectomy Surgery.

Bevacizumab-Augmented Retinal Laser Photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Double-Masked Clinical Trial

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mirshahi ◽  
R. Roohipoor ◽  
A. Lashay ◽  
S.-F. Mohammadi ◽  
A. Abdoallahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Complete Regression ◽  
Standard Laser ◽  
Risk Characteristic

Purpose To evaluate the additional therapeutic effect of single intravitreal bevacizumab injection on standard laser treatment in the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods A prospective, fellow-eye sham controlled clinical trial was conducted on 80 eyes of 40 high-risk characteristic proliferative diabetic retinopathy type II diabetics. All cases received standard laser treatment according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Avastin-assigned eyes received 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab (Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) on the first session of their laser treatments. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and at weeks 6 and 16, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy regression was evaluated in a masked fashion. Results The median age was 52 years (range: 39–68) and 30% of the participants were male. All patients were followed for 16 weeks. A total of 87.5% of Avastin-injected eyes and 25% of sham group showed complete regression at week 6 of follow-up (pp<0.005). However, at week 16, PDR recurred in a sizable number of the Avastin-treated eyes, and the complete regression rate in the two groups became identical (25%; p=1.000); partial regression rates were 70% vs 65%. In the subgroup of Avastin-treated eyes, multivariate analysis identified hemoglobin A1c as the strongest predictor of proliferative diabetic retinopathy recurrence (p=0.033). Conclusions Intravitreal bevacizumab remarkably augmented the short-term response to scatter panretinal laser photocoagulation in high-risk characteristic proliferative diabetic retinopathy but the effect was short-lived, as many of the eyes showed rapid recurrence. Alternative dosing (multiple and/or periodic intravitreal Avastin injections) is recommended for further evaluation.

Ophthalmic treatment of diabetic retinopathy

2020 ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
Ramesh R. Sivaraj ◽  
Jonathan M. Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Diabetic Maculopathy ◽  
Operative Assessment ◽  
Ophthalmic Treatment

The ophthalmic treatment of diabetic retinopathy is aimed at preserving vision and requires an interdisciplinary approach. The main treatments used for proliferative retinopathy and diabetic maculopathy include laser photocoagulation, intra-vitreal, and peri-ocular drug injections, or a combination of both. In advanced cases of diabetic retinopathy (DR), vitrectomy and retinal surgery may help preserve vision. Cataract surgery in diabetic patients is extremely successful, but overall these patients are usually considered to be at risk of more complications than the general population. Those patients with pre-existing DR at the time of surgery should be regarded as a high risk group and will require careful pre-operative assessment and post-operative review. In this group, intervention with laser photocoagulation and intra-vitreal pharmacotherapy may be necessary.

scholarly journals The Role of Angiogenesis in the Development of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Impact of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Treatment

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma Tremolada ◽  
Claudia Del Turco ◽  
Rosangela Lattanzio ◽  
Silvia Maestroni ◽  
Anna Maestroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Blood Vessels ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Antiangiogenic Treatment ◽  
Future Role ◽  
Therapeutic Protocol ◽  
Molecular Bases

Although cellular and molecular bases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy are only partially understood, it is evident that this complication of diabetes is characterized by the formation of new vessels inside the retina showing abnormal architecture and permeability. This process, if not controlled by selective laser photocoagulation, leads to irreversible retinal damages and loss of vision. Angiogenesis, that is, the condition characterized by the growth of new blood vessels originated from preexisting ones, was shown to have a major role in the pathogenesis of proliferative retinopathy and, as a consequence, intravitreal antiangiogenic injection was suggested as a feasible treatment for this disease. Here, we describe the different antiangiogenic approaches used to treat this disease along with the respective advantages and limitations when compared to laser treatment. Altogether, even though further and longer studies are still needed to clarify the best possible therapeutic protocol, the antiangiogenic treatment will reasonably have a future role in the therapy and prevention of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy

2011 ◽  
pp. 1924-1935
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Guly ◽  
Jane R. MacKinnon ◽  
John V. Forrester
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Visual Loss ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Eye Disease ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factors ◽  
Effective Screening ◽  
Telephone Directory ◽  
Appropriate Treatment

Blindness is one of the most feared complications of diabetes and although only a small proportion of people with diabetes will become legally blind, a larger number will have significantly impaired vision affecting their daily life. They may have concerns ranging from difficulty reading the telephone directory to loss of their driving licence and hence, restricted independence. The main issues in diabetic retinopathy are identification of those at risk of visually threatening eye disease, addressing modifiable risk factors, and institution of appropriate treatment. All diabetic patients should have access to an effective screening programme. Laser photocoagulation of the retina remains the cornerstone of treatment of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy, but over the last few years a number of new therapies have been tried and show promise in preventing visual loss from diabetic retinopathy. This chapter will discuss the epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and the characteristic clinical features and will give an outline of practical management.

scholarly journals Pan-retinal photocoagulation and other forms of laser treatment and drug therapies for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: systematic review and economic evaluation

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (51) ◽  
pp. 1-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Royle ◽  
Hema Mistry ◽  
Peter Auguste ◽  
Deepson Shyangdan ◽  
Karoline Freeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Visual Loss ◽  
Argon Laser ◽  
Economic Modelling ◽  
Pan Retinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Retinal Photocoagulation

BackgroundDiabetic retinopathy is an important cause of visual loss. Laser photocoagulation preserves vision in diabetic retinopathy but is currently used at the stage of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).ObjectivesThe primary aim was to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) given at the non-proliferative stage of diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) compared with waiting until the high-risk PDR (HR-PDR) stage was reached. There have been recent advances in laser photocoagulation techniques, and in the use of laser treatments combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs or injected steroids. Our secondary questions were: (1) If PRP were to be used in NPDR, which form of laser treatment should be used? and (2) Is adjuvant therapy with intravitreal drugs clinically effective and cost-effective in PRP?Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) for efficacy but other designs also used.Data sourcesMEDLINE and EMBASE to February 2014, Web of Science.Review methodsSystematic review and economic modelling.ResultsThe Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), published in 1991, was the only trial designed to determine the best time to initiate PRP. It randomised one eye of 3711 patients with mild-to-severe NPDR or early PDR to early photocoagulation, and the other to deferral of PRP until HR-PDR developed. The risk of severe visual loss after 5 years for eyes assigned to PRP for NPDR or early PDR compared with deferral of PRP was reduced by 23% (relative risk 0.77, 99% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.06). However, the ETDRS did not provide results separately for NPDR and early PDR. In economic modelling, the base case found that early PRP could be more effective and less costly than deferred PRP. Sensitivity analyses gave similar results, with early PRP continuing to dominate or having low incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. However, there are substantial uncertainties. For our secondary aims we found 12 trials of lasers in DR, with 982 patients in total, ranging from 40 to 150. Most were in PDR but five included some patients with severe NPDR. Three compared multi-spot pattern lasers against argon laser. RCTs comparing laser applied in a lighter manner (less-intensive burns) with conventional methods (more intense burns) reported little difference in efficacy but fewer adverse effects. One RCT suggested that selective laser treatment targeting only ischaemic areas was effective. Observational studies showed that the most important adverse effect of PRP was macular oedema (MO), which can cause visual impairment, usually temporary. Ten trials of laser and anti-VEGF or steroid drug combinations were consistent in reporting a reduction in risk of PRP-induced MO.LimitationThe current evidence is insufficient to recommend PRP for severe NPDR.ConclusionsThere is, as yet, no convincing evidence that modern laser systems are more effective than the argon laser used in ETDRS, but they appear to have fewer adverse effects. We recommend a trial of PRP for severe NPDR and early PDR compared with deferring PRP till the HR-PDR stage. The trial would use modern laser technologies, and investigate the value adjuvant prophylactic anti-VEGF or steroid drugs.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005408.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Proteomic Analysis of the Vitreous Body in Proliferative and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van-An Duong ◽  
Jeeyun Ahn ◽  
Na-Young Han ◽  
Jong-Moon Park ◽  
Jeong-Hun Mok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Microvascular Complications ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Vitreous Body ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Alpha Beta ◽  
New Treatment

Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), one of the major microvascular complications commonly occurring in diabetic patients, can be classified into Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR). Currently available therapies are only targeted for later stages of the disease in which some pathologic changes may be irreversible. Thus, there is a need to develop new treatment options for earlier stages of DR through revealing pathological mechanisms of PDR and NPDR. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize proteomes of diabetic through quantitative analysis of PDR and NPDR. Methods: Vitreous body was collected from three groups: control (non-diabetes mellitus), NPDR, and PDR. Vitreous proteins were digested to peptide mixtures and analyzed using LC-MS/MS. MaxQuant was used to search against the database and statistical analyses were performed using Perseus. Gene ontology analysis, related-disease identification, and protein-protein interaction were performed using the differential expressed proteins. Results: Twenty proteins were identified as critical in PDR and NPDR. The NPDR group showed different expressions of kininogen-1, serotransferrin, ribonuclease pancreatic, osteopontin, keratin type II cytoskeletal 2 epidermal, and transthyretin. Also, prothrombin, signal transducer and activator of transcription 4, hemoglobin subunit alpha, beta, and delta were particularly up-regulated proteins for PDR group. The up-regulated proteins related to complement and coagulation cascades. Statherin was down-regulated in PDR and NPDR compared with the control group. Transthyretin was the unique protein that increased its abundance in NPDR compared with the PDR and control group. Conclusion: This study confirmed the different expressions of some proteins in PDR and NPDR. Additionally, we revealed uniquely expressed proteins of PDR and NPDR, which would be differential biomarkers: prothrombin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, hemoglobin subunit alpha, beta, and transthyretin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document