Theory and Practice on the Edge of Climate Catastrophe
Keyword(s):
How should philosophy respond to the climate catastrophe? Comparing Stephen Gardiner’s criticism of the prevalence of economic cost-benefit analysis (CBA) in assessing climate policies with Trish Glazebrook and Matt Story’s Heideggerian criticism of technoscientific capitalism, I argue that thinking must attend to practices rendered invisible by dominant theories. While both accounts attempt to delimit and surpass the hegemony of economic calculation, Gardiner’s ideal theory remains committed to the metaphysical prioritization of theory over practice. With help from Derrida, I show how the Glazebrook/Story approach overcomes the sovereignty of theory by opening thinking to practices it cannot generate on its own.
Keyword(s):
2017 ◽
Vol 25
(9)
◽
pp. 638-642
◽
Keyword(s):
2005 ◽
Vol 15
(3)
◽
pp. 261-276
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2009 ◽
Vol 34
(6)
◽
pp. 1567-1578
◽
Keyword(s):