Bone Metastases From Thyroid Carcinoma

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. 1440-1447
Author(s):  
Satish K. Tickoo ◽  
Anastassios G. Pittas ◽  
Michael Adler ◽  
Melissa Fazzari ◽  
Steven M. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Metastatic Tumors ◽  
Thyroid Carcinomas ◽  
Hürthle Cell ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract Context.—Only limited information exists on the pathologic aspects of thyroid carcinomas with bone metastases, most large studies having concentrated mainly on their clinical features. Objective.—To study in detail the morphologic features of thyroid carcinomas with skeletal metastases. Design.—Seventy-nine cases of thyroid carcinoma with bone metastases treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, between 1964 and 1998 were investigated, with emphasis on the pathology of the primary and/or metastatic tumors and comparison of the morphologic features of the tumors at both the sites, wherever possible. The tumors were also compared for various clinical parameters. Results.—The cohort consisted of 22 papillary, 17 follicular, 16 insular, 10 anaplastic, 9 Hürthle cell, and 5 medullary carcinomas. Of these cases, 68% had poorly differentiated or undifferentiated features in the primary and/or metastatic tumors. The metastatic tumors were better differentiated than the primary in one third of the cases (6 of 18). Only one case showed a less differentiated metastasis. The overall 5- and 10-year survival probabilities after the bone metastases were 29% and 13%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier method). Although both the tumor type and differentiation seemed to affect survivals after bone metastasis (P = .007 and .012, respectively) (log-rank test), this was primarily due to the much worse prognosis in the cases of anaplastic and medullary carcinoma. Cases of Hürthle cell carcinoma showed the longest median survival. There was no significant difference in survival among patients up to or older than 45 years at the time of metastases (P = .31). Conclusions.—Most thyroid carcinomas with bone metastases are of papillary type, and most have poorly differentiated or undifferentiated features. The influence of the microscopic tumor type and tumor differentiation on survival after bone metastasis primarily appears to be due to the much worse prognosis among anaplastic and medullary carcinomas. Age at diagnosis of bone metastases does not influence survivals.

Problems and Controversies in the Histopathology of Thyroid Carcinomas of Follicular Cell Origin

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-691
Author(s):  
Ronald Ghossein
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
English Language ◽  
Follicular Carcinoma ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Follicular Cell ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Thyroid Carcinomas ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Disease Entities

Abstract Context.—Despite past and recent efforts, many problems and controversies remain in the classification of thyroid carcinomas of follicular cell origin. These controversies have an impact on the prognosis and therapy of patients with thyroid carcinoma as well as on the development of robust cutting-edge research aimed at better outcome and quality of life. Objective.—To focus on 3 contentious areas with significant clinical value: the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma, the extent of invasion in follicular carcinoma, and the poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Data Sources.—The published English language literature was reviewed. Conclusions.—Recent data show that prognosis and therapy for many disease entities can be better delineated if a meticulous microscopic examination is performed. An accurate assessment of the extent of invasion (especially vascular) is crucial. Proliferative grading (ie, mitosis and necrosis) is of high prognostic value and should be looked for in every specimen. In addition, molecular data gathered to date can help reassess these tumors at the histologic level. Classification proposals based on personal experience rather than adequate and careful clinical follow-up should be discouraged.

scholarly journals MEN1 Mutations in Hürthle Cell (Oncocytic) Thyroid Carcinoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. E611-E615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katayoon Kasaian ◽  
Ana-Maria Chindris ◽  
Sam M. Wiseman ◽  
Karen L. Mungall ◽  
Thomas Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Whole Genome Sequence ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Transcription Control ◽  
Thyroid Carcinomas ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Hürthle Cell

Context and Objective: Oncocytic thyroid carcinoma, also known as Hürthle cell thyroid carcinoma, accounts for only a small percentage of all thyroid cancers. However, this malignancy often presents at an advanced stage and poses unique challenges to patients and clinicians. Surgical resection of the tumor accompanied in some cases by radioactive iodine treatment, radiation, and chemotherapy are the established modes of therapy. Knowledge of the perturbed oncogenic pathways can provide better understanding of the mechanism of disease and thus opportunities for more effective clinical management. Design and Patients: Initially, two oncocytic thyroid carcinomas and their matched normal tissues were profiled using whole genome sequencing. Subsequently, 72 oncocytic thyroid carcinomas, one cell line, and five Hürthle cell adenomas were examined by targeted sequencing for the presence of mutations in the multiple endocrine neoplasia I (MEN1) gene. Results: Here we report the identification of MEN1 loss-of-function mutations in 4% of patients diagnosed with oncocytic thyroid carcinoma. Whole genome sequence data also revealed large regions of copy number variation encompassing nearly the entire genomes of these tumors. Conclusion: Menin, a ubiquitously expressed nuclear protein, is a well-characterized tumor suppressor whose loss is the cause of MEN1 syndrome. Menin is involved in several major cellular pathways such as regulation of transcription, control of cell cycle, apoptosis, and DNA damage repair pathways. Mutations of this gene in a subset of Hürthle cell tumors point to a potential role for this protein and its associated pathways in thyroid tumorigenesis.

Circulating Cytokeratin 19 Fragments in Patients with benign Nodules and Carcinomas of the Thyroid Gland

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Giovanella ◽  
L. Ceriani ◽  
A. Ghelfo ◽  
M. Maffioli
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Cytokeratin 19 ◽  
Thyroid Carcinomas ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Benign Nodules ◽  
Thyroid Malignancies ◽  
Benign Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Benign Thyroid

Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) is an acidic protein of 40 kDa that is part of the cytoskeleton of epithelial cells and is highly expressed by differentiated thyroid carcinomas, mainly of the papillary subtype. The soluble fragments of CK19 (Cyfra 21.1) can be measured by immunometric assays employing specific monoclonal antibodies. The present study was planned to assess the serum expression of Cyfra 21.1 in patients with benign thyroid nodules and thyroid malignancies. We enrolled 135 patients with histologically proven benign thyroid nodules (n=79) and thyroid carcinomas (n=56). No differences were found in serum Cyfra 21.1 levels between patients with benign nodules and patients with carcinomas. When thyroid malignancies were subdivided according to tumor histology, serum Cyfra 21.1 increased significantly from classical differentiated thyroid carcinomas (papillary or follicular) to less differentiated or undifferentiated carcinomas (poorly differentiated or anaplastic). CK19 release into the bloodstream is strongly related to the apoptotic pathway, and particularly to hyperproliferation-related apoptosis. These pathways characterized anaplastic and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma but not classical forms of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Consequently, Cyfra 21.1 may be regarded as a circulating marker of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Additionally, a role of Cyfra 21.1 as a dedifferentiation marker in patients with classical differentiated thyroid carcinomas may be postulated and should be explored by further focused studies.

A re-analysis of the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial accounting for ovarian cancer (OVCA) heterogeneity.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5564-5564
Author(s):  
Sarah Madhu Temkin ◽  
Eric A Miller ◽  
Goli Samimi ◽  
Christine D Berg ◽  
Paul Pinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cancer Screening Trial ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Tumor Types

5564 Background: A mortality benefit from screening for OVCA has not been demonstrated, but screening efficacy could differ for histologic subtypes. We re-analyzed PLCO evaluating whether OVCA detection and outcomes were affected by the heterogeneous biologic behavior of this disease. Methods: Type 2 tumors (moderately/poorly differentiated serous and adenocarcinoma) were compared to all other tumor (OT) types (low grade serous and endometrioid, clear cell, other, low malignancy potential) (LMP). We examined differences in the distribution of tumor types and stage by study arm and method of diagnosis [screen detected (SD) and interval detected (ID) (i.e. assigned to screening but diagnosed between screening tests)]. Stage distribution and survival were analyzed. Results: Among the entire PLCO population, 531 women were diagnosed with OVCA during the study; 282 (53%) in the screening arm and 249 (47%) in the usual care arm. Of the tumors able to be characterized (n=408; 77%), 74% (n=300) were Type 2 and 26% OT (n=108). In the screening arm, 70% of tumors diagnosed were Type 2 compared to 78% in usual care (p=0.07). Overall, survival was significantly better for OT tumors compared to Type 2 tumors (p<0.01) but there was no difference in survival by study arm for either tumor type separately (Type 2: p=0.50; OT: p=0.23). Within the screening arm, 30% of Type 2 tumors were SD compared to 54% of OT tumors (p=0.02) (see Table). Only 15% of Type 2 SD tumors were Stage I/II, compared to 82% of SD OT tumors (p<0.01). Stage at diagnosis was similar among Type 2 patients whether they were SD or ID (p=0.56) and there was no difference in survival (p=0.56). Conclusions: A significant difference in tumor types by study arm was not observed. However, within the screening arm, Type 2 tumors were less likely to be SD or Stage I/II compared to OT tumors. Survival for Type 2 tumors was similar regardless of method of diagnosis. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document