The New American Cancer Society Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines and the Role of the Pathologist

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T. Cagle
2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Wender ◽  
Elizabeth T. H. Fontham ◽  
Ermilo Barrera ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Timothy R. Church ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 003335492097171
Author(s):  
Lesley Watson ◽  
Megan M. Cotter ◽  
Shauna Shafer ◽  
Kara Neloms ◽  
Robert A. Smith ◽  
...  

Using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen for lung cancer is associated with improved outcomes among eligible current and former smokers (ie, aged 55-77, at least 30-pack–year smoking history, current smoker or former smoker who quit within the past 15 years). However, the overall uptake of LDCT is low, especially in health care settings with limited personnel and financial resources. To increase access to lung cancer screening services, the American Cancer Society partnered with 2 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Tennessee and West Virginia to conduct a pilot project focused on developing and refining the LDCT screening referral processes and practices. Each FQHC was required to partner with an American College of Radiology–designated lung cancer screening center in its area to ensure high-quality patient care. The pilot project was conducted in 2 phases: 6 months of capacity building (January–June 2016) followed by 2 years of implementation (July 2016–June 2018). One site created a sustainable LDCT referral program, and the other site encountered numerous barriers and failed to overcome them. This case study highlights implementation barriers and factors associated with success and improved outcomes in LDCT screening.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S1173-S1174
Author(s):  
C. Olazagasti ◽  
A. Velazquez ◽  
M. Ehrlich ◽  
N. Kohn ◽  
N. Seetharamu

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra L. Potter ◽  
Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang ◽  
Kirsten M. Woolpert ◽  
Thrusha Puttaraju ◽  
Kei Suzuki ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda C. Aldrich ◽  
Sarah F. Mercaldo ◽  
Kim L. Sandler ◽  
William J. Blot ◽  
Eric L. Grogan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christine D. Berg ◽  
Denise R. Aberle ◽  
Douglas E. Wood

OVERVIEW: The results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) have provided the medical community and American public with considerable optimism about the potential to reduce lung cancer mortality with imaging-based screening. Designed as a randomized trial, the NLST has provided the first evidence of screening benefit by showing a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality and a 6.7% reduction in all-cause mortality with low dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) screening relative to chest X-ray. The major harms of LDCT screening include the potential for radiation-induced carcinogenesis; high false-positivity rates in individuals without lung cancer, and overdiagnosis. Following the results of the NLST, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) published the first of multiple lung cancer screening guidelines under development by major medical organizations. These recommendations amalgamated screening cohorts, practices, interpretations, and diagnostic follow-up based on the NLST and other published studies to provide guidance for the implementation of LDCT screening. There are major areas of opportunity to optimize implementation. These include standardizing practices in the screening setting, optimizing risk profiles for screening and for managing diagnostic evaluation in individuals with indeterminate nodules, developing interdisciplinary screening programs in conjunction with smoking cessation, and approaching all stakeholders systematically to ensure the broadest education and dissemination of screening benefits relative to risks. The incorporation of validated biomarkers of risk and preclinical lung cancer can substantially enhance the effectiveness screening programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document