Humanity's end: why we should reject radical enhancement

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (08) ◽  
pp. 48-4393-48-4393
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Ellen M. McGee

Transformations of humans through advances in bioelectronics, nanotechnologies, and computer science are leading to hybrids of humans and machines. Future brain-machine interfaces will enable humans not only to be constantly linked to the Internet, and to cyber think, but will also enable technology to take information directly from the brain. Brain-computer interfaces, where a chip is implanted in the brain, will facilitate a tremendous augmentation of human capacities, including the radical enhancement of the human ability to remember and to reason, and to achieve immortality through cloning and brain downloading, or existence in virtual reality. The ethical and legal issues raised by these possibilities represent global challenges. The most pressing concerns are those raised by privacy and autonomy. The potential exists for control of persons, through global tracking, by actually “seeing” and “hearing” what the individual is experiencing, and by controlling and directing an individual’s thoughts, emotions, moods, and motivations. Public dialogue must be initiated. New principles, agencies, and regulations need to be formulated and scientific organizations, states, countries, and the United Nations must all be involved.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
J. Adam Carter

Epistemic autonomy is necessary for knowledge in ways that epistemologists have not yet fully appreciated. This chapter uses a series of thought experiments featuring (radical) forms of cognitive enhancement in order to show why; in particular, and with reference to a series of tweaks on Lehrer’s ‘TrueTemp’ case, I motivate an autonomous belief condition on propositional knowledge, a condition the satisfaction of which—it will be shown—is neither entailed by, nor entails, the satisfaction of either a belief condition or, importantly, an epistemic justification condition. This transition from a ‘JTB+X’ to a ‘JTAB+X’ template marks an important and needed update to the received thinking about what knowing involves. (Of course, the question of whether knowledge is analysable is contentious; an appendix for knowledge-firsters explains the relevance of the necessity of epistemic autonomy for knowledge for knowledge-first projects).


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 1031-1035
Author(s):  
Sara Sangtarash ◽  
Hatef Sadeghi

The challenge in exploiting quantum interference (QI) in molecules for thermoelectricity lies in controlling the alignment of QI induced resonances close to electrodes Fermi level. We show that spin orbitals in stable radicals can be utilised to overcome this challenge.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-439
Author(s):  
Milos Agatonovic

Transhumanism, the movement that promotes radical enhancement by non-traditional means based in scientific and technological advances, has contributed to contemporary interest in Nietzsche?s philosophy. In this paper, we are going to claim that transhumanists? references to Nietzsche?s philosophy are unfounded. Moreover, we will make a few remarks about Nietzsche?s ethical doctrine in order to show that his conception of enhancement, contrary to transhumanist conceptions, relies on traditional means, such as upbringing and education. Although Nietzsche?s positive ethical doctrines cannot be used to justify transhumanist goals, his critique of morality can be used as a critique of the transhumanist conceptions of human enhancement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-165
Author(s):  
Jesse Gray

1993 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 493 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Yalowich ◽  
H.G. Claycamp ◽  
D.A. Stoyanovsky ◽  
W. Allan ◽  
T.G. Gantchev ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 14-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy P. Gray ◽  
Vladimir V. Vantsevich ◽  
Jesse Paldan

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Holub

This article deals with some uncertainties associated with human enhancement ethics. It presents the latter as a kind of a narrative made up of scientific and philosophical concepts. In the paper it is shown that scientific notions underpinning the human enhancement tendency are burdened with a substantial level of uncertainty, especially when the radical enhancement is considered. On the level of philosophical thinking, we encounter many unresolved questions concerning the understanding of the good and our post human destiny, namely who we want to become and why. This amounts to a high level of uncertainty. However, uncertainties are not utterly useless and destructive. They can play roles of stimulating factors or, at least, they can be helpful in discovering new horizons for our existence. In some situations they can also lead us to realize and appreciate what we possess already.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document