scholarly journals Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Gallbladder Masses

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galam Leem ◽  
Moon Jae Chung ◽  
Jeong Youp Park ◽  
Seungmin Bang ◽  
Si Young Song ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
D. D. Kovalenko ◽  
E. V. Bystrovskaya ◽  
G. M. Pronina ◽  
Yu. N. Orlova ◽  
A. B. Abduraimov

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Kamata ◽  
Mamoru Takenaka ◽  
Masayuki Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Omoto ◽  
Takeshi Miyata ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 1909-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroo Imazu ◽  
Naoki Mori ◽  
Keisuke Kanazawa ◽  
Masafumi Chiba ◽  
Hirobumi Toyoizumi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB333
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Matsubara ◽  
Yoshiki Hirooka ◽  
Akihiro Itoh ◽  
Hiroki Kawashima ◽  
Eizaburo Ohno ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqing Yuan ◽  
Xuesong Liu ◽  
Qiwei Li ◽  
Yunhe Zhang ◽  
Ling Zhao ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) versus computed tomography (CT) for distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps. Given whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is needed, differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps is more important than benign and malignant polyps.MethodsA total of 89 consecutive patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder > 10 mm in size without local invasion or distant metastasis during primary screening were enrolled in this prospective and comparative study. All patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent CEUS and CT examinations prior to surgical resection. The enhancement patterns and microvascular imaging types were analyzed on CEUS. The maximum diameter and CT value of the lesions were also recorded and subjected to a comparative analysis. The clinical value of the two diagnostic methods is compared.ResultsOf the 89 patients, there were 58 (65.2%) cases of non-neoplastic polyps and 31 (34.8%) cases of neoplastic polyps. The average diameter of neoplastic polyps was significantly higher than that of non-neoplastic polyps (P<0.001). The detection rate using CEUS was 100%. The proportion of perceived non-neoplastic polyps in the nonenhanced and arterial phases were 48.3% and 77.6%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of neoplastic polyps (93.5%, P<0.001 and 100.0%, P<0.001, respectively). However, in the venous and delayed phases, all cholesterol polyps and neoplastic polyps were perceived. CT showed that non-neoplastic polyps exhibited delayed enhancement. On CEUS 29.0% neoplastic polyps showed a perfusion defect, whereas 6.9% non-neoplastic polyps showed a perfusion defect (P=0.005). The microvascular architecture of the lesions on CEUS was categorized into 4 types: spotty, linear, branched, and spinous, and there were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.001). The sensitivities and specificities were 87.10% and 68.97% for CEUS and 83.87% and 77.59% for CT, respectively (P=0.406).ConclusionsCEUS and CT are useful for differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Diagnostic efficacy was comparable between CEUS and CT. Thus, CEUS is preferred over CT in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps due to its comparable diagnostic efficacy and lack of radiation dose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibin Mei ◽  
Mengyu Wang ◽  
Leimin Sun

Background. Though methods for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses are various, such as ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are not quite satisfying. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS), as a new technique, has its own unique advantages in diagnosing pancreatic disease. However, its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are still controversial. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of CE-EUS for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant pancreatic mass lesions. Design. Eighteen relevant articles systemically searched from PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Scopus, and MEDLINE were selected. The pooled results were calculated in a fixed effects model. Main Outcome Measurement. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Results. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of CE-EUS for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas were 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-0.93), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), and 69.50 (95% CI, 48.89-98.80), respectively. The SROC area under the curve was 0.9545. The subgroup analysis based on excluding the outliers showed that the heterogeneity was eliminated and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.89), respectively. The SROC area under the curve was 0.9569. Conclusion. CE-EUS is a useful method to distinguish pancreatic adenocarcinoma from other pancreatic diseases. Compared with EUS elastography, it has higher specificity. However, it is still not superior to pathological diagnosis for the identification of pancreatic carcinomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document