scholarly journals Proper Treatment Option for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-517
Author(s):  
Seun Ja Park
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Proper Treatment ◽  
Mucosal Resection

UNDERWATER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR SMALL RECTAL NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Coutinho ◽  
O Okazaki ◽  
C Casamali ◽  
L Lenz ◽  
C Pennacchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mucosal Resection

scholarly journals Anchoring the snare tip is a feasible endoscopic mucosal resection method for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeongseok Kim ◽  
Jisup Kim ◽  
Eun Hye Oh ◽  
Nam Seok Ham ◽  
Sung Wook Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
The Mean

AbstractSmall rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be treated using cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C), which requires additional effort to apply a dedicated cap and snare. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a simpler modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique, so-called anchored snare-tip EMR (ASEMR), for the treatment of small rectal NETs, comparing it with EMR-C. We retrospectively evaluated 45 ASEMR and 41 EMR-C procedures attempted on small suspected or established rectal NETs between July 2015 and May 2020. The mean (SD) lesion size was 5.4 (2.2) mm and 5.2 (1.7) mm in the ASEMR and EMR-C groups, respectively (p = 0.558). The en bloc resection rates of suspected or established rectal NETs were 95.6% (43/45) and 100%, respectively (p = 0.271). The rates of histologic complete resection of rectal NETs were 94.1% (32/34) and 88.2% (30/34), respectively (p = 0.673). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the ASEMR group than in the EMR-C group (3.12 [1.97] vs. 4.13 [1.59] min, p = 0.024). Delayed bleeding occurred in 6.7% (3/45) and 2.4% (1/41) of patients, respectively (p = 0.618). In conclusion, ASEMR was less time-consuming than EMR-C, and showed similar efficacy and safety profiles. ASEMR is a feasible treatment option for small rectal NETs.

Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4313-4318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wook-Hyun Lee ◽  
Sang-Woo Kim ◽  
Chul-Hyun Lim ◽  
Jin-Soo Kim ◽  
Yu-Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Dual Channel

Efficacy and safety of modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (02) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Chun Zheng ◽  
Kai Zheng ◽  
Shuai Zhao ◽  
Zhen-Ning Wang ◽  
Hui-Mian Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Lateral Margin ◽  
Endoscopic Polypectomy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Margin Involvement ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Purpose Rectal neuroendocrine tumors are rare with good prognosis. Several endoscopic methods such as endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and modified endoscopic mucosal resection (m-EMR) are used in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Although m-EMR is derived from traditional EMR, it has not been widely used in clinical practice. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of EMR and m-EMR in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors by performing a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE index up to the end of January 2017 for all published literature about EMR and m-EMR in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Results A total of 11 studies involving 811 patients were included. The pooled data suggested that there was a significantly higher rate of histologic complete resection and endoscopic complete resection among patients treated with m-EMR than those treated with EMR (histologic complete resection: OR = 0.23, 95 % CI = 0.10–0.51, p < 0.01; endoscopic complete resection: OR = 0.13, 95 % CI = 0.02–0.74, p = 0.02). The procedure time of EMR was longer than m-EMR (MD = 2.40, 95 % CI = 0.33–4.46, p = 0.02). There was a significantly higher rate of vertical margin involvement among patients treated with EMR than those treated with m-EMR; whereas, there was no significant difference of lateral margin involvement between the m-EMR and EMR groups (vertical margin involvement: OR = 5.00, 95 % CI = 2.67–9.33, p < 0.01; lateral margin involvement: OR = 1.44, 95 % CI = 0.48–4.37, p = 0.52). There was no significant difference in mean tumor size among patients treated with m-EMR versus those treated with EMR (MD = −0.30, 95 % CI = −0.75–0.14, p = 0.18); further, there was no significant difference in endoscopic mean sizes of the tumor and pathological mean sizes of the tumor between the m-EMR and EMR groups (endoscopic mean sizes of the tumor: MD = 0.20, 95 % CI = −0.44–0.84, p = 0.43; pathological mean sizes of the tumor: MD = 0.62, 95 % CI = −0.68–1.92, p = 0.05). No significant differences were detected among the treatment groups with regard to complications (bleeding: OR = 0.87, 95 % CI = 0.39–1.95, p = 0.73; complications (bleeding and perforation): OR = 0.87, 95 % CI = 0.40–1.88, p = 0.73). Conclusion The efficacy of m-EMR are better than EMR among patients undergoing endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors, and the safety of m-EMR is equivalent to EMR treatment.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoonsub So ◽  
Su Hyun Yoo ◽  
Seungbong Han ◽  
Gwang-un Kim ◽  
Myeongsook Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mucosal Resection

scholarly journals Endoscopic mucosal resection: still a reliable therapeutic option for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholam Reza Sivandzadeh ◽  
Fardad Ejtehadi ◽  
Shima Shoaee ◽  
Ladan Aminlari ◽  
Ramin Niknam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Pathology Reports ◽  
Age Range

Abstract Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as a rare and heterogeneous category of solid tumors, feature various morphologies and behaviors. In recent years, the incidence of NETs has continued to increase. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is one of the therapeutic modalities for the treatment of gastric and rectal NETs. Methods We evaluated patients with well-differentiated NETs of the stomach, duodenum, or rectum between 2011 and 2018. In this study, all cases with tumors confined to the mucosal or submucosal layers and smaller than 20 mm were resected using the EMR technique. We used EUS, CT scan, or MRI to exclude patients with advanced disease. All patients were actively monitored for recurrence according to the recommended protocols. Results A total of 36 patients with NETs entered the study; 17 (47.2%) were female and the remaining 19 (52.8%) were male, with a total age range of 20–74 years (mean: 52.47 ± 13.47 years). Among the tumors, 31 cases (86.1%) were G1 and the remaining 5 (13.9%) were G2. Based on the pathology reports, 22 tumors (61.1%) were smaller than 1 cm, while the remaining 14 (38.9%) were between 1–2 cm. Twenty-two patients (61.1%) had a margin of specimen involved with the tumor. No recurrence was observed during the mean follow-up time of 63.5 ± 19.8 months (range: 39–103 months). All 36 cases survived during the study period. Conclusion Conventional EMR procedure provides low chance of R0 (complete resection) achievement in gastrointestinal NETs smaller than 20 mm and limited to the mucosa or sub mucosa. However, it could be an option if patients are closely followed. Postoperative marginal involvement is not a reliable predictor of disease recurrence, which may be explained by the deleterious effect of heat coagulation and cauterization applied during tumor removal.

Management of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Surgical versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine G. Tran ◽  
Scott K. Sherman ◽  
Mohammed O. Suraju ◽  
Apoorve Nayyar ◽  
Henning Gerke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Comparison of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (with videos)

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1164-1171.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Sil Park ◽  
Kyung Su Han ◽  
Bun Kim ◽  
Byung Chang Kim ◽  
Chang Won Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

scholarly journals Treatment Results of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with a Ligation Device for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 773-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Fujimoto ◽  
Motoki Sasaki ◽  
Osamu Goto ◽  
Tadateru Maehata ◽  
Yasutoshi Ochiai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document