The Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation and Academic Motivation among Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1443
Author(s):  
Syaidatul Nadrah Ahmad Tarmizi ◽  
Roslee Ahmad ◽  
Sapora Sipon ◽  
Rezki Perdani Sawai ◽  
Muhamad Khairi Mahyuddin ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 2330-2341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randi A. Bates ◽  
Pamela J. Salsberry ◽  
Laura M. Justice ◽  
Jaclyn M. Dynia ◽  
Jessica A. R. Logan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 217 ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jitka Jakešová ◽  
Peter Gavora ◽  
Jan Kalenda ◽  
Soňa Vávrová

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S318-S318
Author(s):  
Wenhui Zhang ◽  
Kavita Radhakrishnan ◽  
Heather Becker ◽  
Gayle Acton ◽  
Carole K Holahan

Abstract Quantitative and qualitative evidence supported the self-regulation strategies of Selection, Optimization and Compensation (SR-SOC), used by people aging with single and multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) to adapt to chronic disabling symptoms and live well. This study investigated the SR-SOC Strategies in the self-management of community-dwelling people aging with arthritis and MCCs. 140 individuals aged > 50 completed the demographic questionnaire, Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI), Brief Health Literacy Screening, Lubben Social Network Scale, Patient-Healthcare Provider Communication Scale, Health Insurance Check-list, PROMIS Adult Self-Reported Health Measures, SOC Questionnaire, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, Healthcare Service Utilization Questionnaire, and a visual analogue QOL scale. With the theoretical framework, multivariate hierarchical stepwise regression was used to predict SR-SOC Strategies, arthritis self-efficacy, healthcare utilizations and QOL. Majority of the sample were female (70%), with < Bachelor’s degree (56%), White (34%) or African American (33%), with personal annual income < $25,000 (52%). Thirty-seven percent reported fairly and 26% poorly adequate income. Number of FCI count ranged from 2 to 14 (Mean =3.8). The top four comorbidities were obesity, diabetes, visual impairment and degenerative disc disease. QOL ranged from 0.5 to 10.0 (Mean=7.2, SD=2.2). Age, physical symptom cluster (pain, fatigue and cognitive abilities) and healthcare provider communication quality significantly predicted SR-SOC strategies. Income adequacy, physical symptom cluster and SR-SOC strategies significantly predicted arthritis self-efficacy. FCI significantly predicted healthcare utilization total, inpatient healthcare utilization, clinician visit and hospitalization. With income adequacy, FCI significantly predicted home health visit and emergency room visit. Being African American and FCI significantly predicted prescriptions filled.


2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 983-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamden K. Strunk ◽  
Misty R. Steele

The relative contributions of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-handicapping student procrastination were explored. College undergraduate participants ( N = 138; 40 men, 97 women, one not reporting sex) filled out the Procrastination Scale, the Self-Handicapping Scale–Short Form, and the Self-regulation and Self-handicapping scales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. A hierarchical regression of the above measures indicated that self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-handicapping all predicted scores on the Procrastination Scale, but self-regulation fully accounted for the predictive power of self-efficacy. The results suggested self-regulation and self-handicapping predict procrastination independently. These findings are discussed in relation to the literature on the concept of “self-efficacy for self-regulation” and its use in the field of procrastination research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Gholamali Lavasani ◽  
Fatemeh Sadat Mirhosseini ◽  
Elahe Hejazi ◽  
Maryam Davoodi

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamden K Strunk ◽  
Misty Steele

The relative contributions of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-handicapping on student procrastination were explored. College undergraduate participants (N = 138; 40 men, 97 women) filled out the Procrastination Scale, the Self-Handicapping Scale–Short Form (Strube, 1986), and the Self-Regulation and Self-Handicapping scales of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich & De Groot, 1990). A hierarchical regression of the above measures indicated that self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-handicapping all predicted scores on the Procrastination Scale, but self-regulation fully accounted for the predictive power of self-efficacy. The results suggested self-regulation and self-handicapping predict procrastination independently. These findings are discussed in relation to the literature on the concept of “self-efficacy for self-regulation” and its use in the field of procrastination research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 35-58
Author(s):  
V.R. Manukyan ◽  
I.R. Murtazina ◽  
N.V. Grishina

The paper presents the development of the Self-Change Potential questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaire was conducted in three steps. Within the first series of studies (N=248) the structure of the questionnaire was defined, the consistency of the resulting scales was checked and certain items were corrected. The construct validity of the modified version of the questionnaire was tested within the second series of studies (N=569). At the final stage (N=36) test-retest reliability was checked. The obtained Cronbach’s α coefficients (0,64—0,8) for all scales of the questionnaire and the sum score demonstrated its satisfactory consistency. All items had significant correlations with the sum score (р<0,0001). To test the construct validity we used the Change Response Styles Questionnaire, the Portrait Value Questionnaire (revised version), the Style of Conscious Self-Regulation of the Behavior Questionnaire, and the Self-Efficacy Scale. Correlations with these measures confirmed the construct validity of the questionnaire. The Self-Change Potential Questionnaire can be used for assessing a person’s ability for self-changes on the various levels of mental organization, which could be consciously initiated and actualized.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2161-2172
Author(s):  
Mantasiah Rivai ◽  
Yusri Yusri ◽  
Andi Tenri Ola Rivai ◽  
Muhammad Anwar

This study aims to investigate the influence of teachers’ language politeness on students’ academic motivation and self-efficacy during online learning (school from home) and to examine the relationship between students’ academic motivation and self-efficacy during online learning. This study used a quantitative approach with the correlational method. The participants of the study were 150 elementary students (male: 47%; female: 53%). Three types of scales were used in this study, namely the teachers’ language politeness scale, the academic motivation scale and the self-efficacy scale. The hypothesis of the study was tested using analysis of variance assisted with SPSS version 26. The study found that teachers’ language politeness significantly influences students’ academic motivation and self-efficacy during online learning. Teachers’ language politeness was more likely to have greater influence on students’ self-efficacy than on students’ academic motivation. As shown in the model, the value of the relationship between students’ academic motivation and self-efficacy was 0.497.   Keywords: Language politeness, academic motivation, self-efficacy, school from home.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document