Influence of stabilized nitrogen fertilizer use on yield, nutrient uptake and soil quality under maize-wheat sequence in Uttar Pradesh

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 442
Author(s):  
D. D. TIWARI ◽  
S. B. PANDEY ◽  
N. K. KATIYAR
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 15885-15895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandana Tayefeh ◽  
Seyyed Mustafa Sadeghi ◽  
Seyyed Ali Noorhosseini ◽  
Jacopo Bacenetti ◽  
Christos A. Damalas

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 1401-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. F. Bronson ◽  
D. J. Hunsaker ◽  
J. Mon ◽  
P. Andrade-Sanchez ◽  
J. W. White ◽  
...  

Land ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheikh Adil Edrisi ◽  
Vishal Tripathi ◽  
Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil Abhilash

The successful utilization of marginal and degraded lands for biomass and bioenergy production depends upon various factors such as climatic conditions, the adaptive traits of the tree species and their growth rate and respective belowground responses. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the growth performance of a bioenergy tree (Dalbergia sissoo Roxb.) grown in marginal and degraded land of the Mirzapur district of Uttar Pradesh, India and to analyze the effect of D. sissoo plantations on soil quality improvement over the study years. For this, a soil quality index (SQI) was developed based on principal component analysis (PCA) to understand the effect of D. sissoo plantations on belowground responses. PCA results showed that among the studied soil variables, bulk density (BD), moisture content (MC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and soil urease activity (SUA) are the key variables critically influencing the growth of D. sissoo. The SQI was found in an increasing order with the growth period of D. sissoo. (i.e., from 0.419 during the first year to 0.579 in the fourth year). A strong correlation was also observed between the growth attributes (diameter at breast height, R2 = 0.870; and plant height, R2 = 0.861) and the soil quality (p < 0.01). Therefore, the developed SQI can be used as key indicator for monitoring the restoration potential of D. sissoo growing in marginal and degraded lands and also for adopting suitable interventions to further improve soil quality for multipurpose land restoration programs, thereby attaining land degradation neutrality and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.


1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert I. Papendick ◽  
Lloyd F. Elliott ◽  
James F. Power

AbstractEvidence indicates a strong positive relationship between increases in nitrogen fertilizer use on cropland and nitrate concentrations in shallow ground water. This raises concern about the fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer with current farming practices. Approximately 50 percent of the nitrogen fertilizer applied may be recovered by agronomic crops and 35 percent or less removed in the harvested grain of a crop such as corn. The residual nitrogen is subject to loss by several processes, one being leaching from the crop root zone. Alternative production systems that provide ground water protection must give attention to improved management of nitrogen fertilizer and to practices that minimize the need for nitrogen fertilizer and reduce soil nitrate concentrations. Most important in nitrogen fertilizer management is to more closely match nitrogen availability in the soil with crop needs and to avoid over-fertilization. Nitrogen fertilizer use can be reduced by alternate cropping of low and high nitrogen-demanding crops, use of legumes in the crop rotation to fix nitrogen, and proper use of manures, crop residues, and other organic wastes. Residual nitrates in soil can be reduced by use of cover crops, nitrogen-scavenging crops in the rotation, and alternating shallow and deep-rooted crops. Conservation tillage alone as used with many conventional cropping systems will probably not change the current status of nitrate leaching. Practices used by organic farmers should be carefully studied as possible approaches for ground water protection and adaptation into conservation tillage systems for conserving soil and water resources.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manu Partap Singh ◽  
Pardeep Kumar ◽  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Robin Kumar ◽  
Ashish Diwedi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document