scholarly journals Assessment of First Generation Performance-Based Seismic Design Methods for New Steel Buildings, Volume 1: Special Moment Frames

Author(s):  
John L. Harris III ◽  
Matthew S. Speicher
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 977-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Harris ◽  
Matthew Speicher

This paper presents the results of a study investigating the correlation between the anticipated seismic performance of an ASCE 7 code-compliant steel building with special moment frames and its predicted performance as quantified using ASCE 41 analysis procedures and structural performance metrics. Analytical results based on component-level performances at the collapse prevention structural performance level indicate that special moment frames designed in accordance with ASCE 7, and its referenced standards, have difficulty satisfying the acceptance criteria in ASCE 41 for an existing building intended to be equivalent to a new building.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1683-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Tapia-Hernández ◽  
Arturo Tena-Colunga

In order to help improve the seismic design of regular steel buildings structured with ductile moment-resisting concentrically braced frames (MRCBFs) using the general design methodology of Mexico's Federal District Code (MFDC-04), suitable design parameters were first assessed using the results of pushover analyses of 13 regular MRCBFs. In order to insure collapse mechanisms consistent with the assumptions implicit in a code-based design (strong-column/weak-beam/weaker-brace), it is proposed to relate the minimum strength ratio for the resisting columns of the moment frames and the bracing system. Improved equations are proposed for a more realistic assessment of ductility and overstrength factors. In a second stage, the effectiveness of the improved methodology was assessed with the design of six regular steel buildings with MRCBFs. Buildings were evaluated by performing both pushover and nonlinear time-history analyses under ten selected artificial ground motions related to the corresponding design spectrum.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 2033-2057
Author(s):  
Miguel Medalla ◽  
Diego Lopez-Garcia ◽  
Farzin Zareian

Current seismic design requirements were established considering mainly (almost exclusively) ground motions caused by shallow crustal earthquakes, hence they might lead to different-from-intended risk levels when applied at locations prone to large-magnitude subduction (i.e. megathrust) earthquakes. In this study, the seismic behavior of 40 modern steel special moment frames (SSMFs) subjected to both megathrust and crustal ground motions is evaluated. Three analyses are performed: (1) a hazard-consistent analysis; (2) a comparative collapse risk evaluation; and (3) a performance evaluation following the approach indicated in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) P695. Results indicate that the collapse probability of mid- and high-rise SSMFs subjected to megathrust ground motions is indeed larger than that under crustal ground motions. Modifications to the current design criteria are then suggested, intended not only for United States but also for countries, such as Ecuador, where the US seismic design requirements for steel structures were adopted and seismic ground motions are actually caused by megathrust earthquakes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 895-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Whan Han ◽  
Ki Hoon Moon ◽  
Seong-Hoon Hwang ◽  
Bozidar Stojadinovic

A reduced beam section with a bolted web (RBS-B) connection is permitted for use only in intermediate moment frames (IMF) according to the ANSI/AISC 358-05. This is because some RBS-B test specimens failed to achieve 4% total rotation capacity, which is the minimum story drift angle required for special moment frames (SMF). Several studies reported that some RBS-B connections could experience brittle connection fracture during earthquakes, which can also be detrimental to the seismic performance of IMF systems with RBS-B connections. For investigating whether IMFs with RBS-B connections provide a satisfactory seismic performance, this study evaluated the seismic performance of IMFs with pre-qualified RBS-B connections following the ATC-63 procedure. Twenty-four model buildings were designed according to current seismic design provisions. Several IMFs with RBS-B connections do not satisfy the acceptance criteria specified in ATC-63.


1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sutat Leelataviwat ◽  
Subhash C. Goel ◽  
Božidar Stojadinović

A new performance-based plastic design procedure for steel moment frames is presented in this paper. The role of plastic analysis in seismic design of structures is illustrated. The ultimate design base shear for plastic analysis is derived by using the input energy from the design pseudo-velocity spectrum, a pre-selected yield mechanism, and an ultimate target drift. The proposed design procedure eliminates the need for a drift check after the structure is designed for strength as is done in the current design practice. Also, there is no need for response modification factors since the load deformation characteristics of the structure, including ductility and post-yield behavior, are explicitly used in calculating the design forces. The results of nonlinear static and nonlinear dynamic analyses of an example steel moment frame designed by the proposed method are presented and discussed. The implications of the new design procedure for future generation of seismic design codes are also discussed.


Author(s):  
Ronald O Hamburger ◽  
Helmut Krawinkler ◽  
James O Malley ◽  
Scott M Adan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document