scholarly journals Ambiguity in Finite Automata

1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (82) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Meineche Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Regular Expression ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata

<p>The gain in succinctness of descriptions of regular languages when nondeterministic (unambiguous) finite automata are used rather than unambiguous (deterministic) finite automata, is not bounded by any polynomium.</p><p>The problem of deciding whether an unambiguous regular expression does not generate all words over its terminal alphabet, is in NP.</p>

Space-bounded OTMs and REG ∞

Computability ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Merlin Carl
Keyword(s):  
Complexity Theory ◽  
Turing Machine ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
The Other ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Logarithmic Space ◽  
Working Space ◽  
Important Theorem

An important theorem in classical complexity theory is that REG = LOGLOGSPACE, i.e., that languages decidable with double-logarithmic space bound are regular. We consider a transfinite analogue of this theorem. To this end, we introduce deterministic ordinal automata (DOAs) and show that they satisfy many of the basic statements of the theory of deterministic finite automata and regular languages. We then consider languages decidable by an ordinal Turing machine (OTM), introduced by P. Koepke in 2005 and show that if the working space of an OTM is of strictly smaller cardinality than the input length for all sufficiently long inputs, the language so decided is also decidable by a DOA, which is a transfinite analogue of LOGLOGSPACE ⊆ REG; the other direction, however, is easily seen to fail.

scholarly journals Nondeterministic Syntactic Complexity

2021 ◽  
pp. 448-468
Author(s):  
Robert S. R. Myers ◽  
Stefan Milius ◽  
Henning Urbat
Keyword(s):  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Syntactic Complexity ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Syntactic Monoid ◽  
Nondeterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Structural Work ◽  
Algebraic Interpretation ◽  
Nondeterministic State

AbstractWe introduce a new measure on regular languages: their nondeterministic syntactic complexity. It is the least degree of any extension of the ‘canonical boolean representation’ of the syntactic monoid. Equivalently, it is the least number of states of any subatomic nondeterministic acceptor. It turns out that essentially all previous structural work on nondeterministic state-minimality computes this measure. Our approach rests on an algebraic interpretation of nondeterministic finite automata as deterministic finite automata endowed with semilattice structure. Crucially, the latter form a self-dual category.

UNWEIGHTED AND WEIGHTED HYPER-MINIMIZATION

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (06) ◽  
pp. 1207-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREAS MALETTI ◽  
DANIEL QUERNHEIM
Keyword(s):  
Finite Automata ◽  
Reduction Technique ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Minimization Algorithm ◽  
Compression Method ◽  
Closure Properties ◽  
State Reduction ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Input Strings ◽  
Weighted Finite Automata

Hyper-minimization of deterministic finite automata (DFA) is a recently introduced state reduction technique that allows a finite change in the recognized language. A generalization of this lossy compression method to the weighted setting over semifields is presented, which allows the recognized weighted language to differ for finitely many input strings. First, the structure of hyper-minimal deterministic weighted finite automata is characterized in a similar way as in classical weighted minimization and unweighted hyper-minimization. Second, an efficient hyper-minimization algorithm, which runs in time [Formula: see text], is derived from this characterization. Third, the closure properties of canonical regular languages, which are languages recognized by hyper-minimal DFA, are investigated. Finally, some recent results in the area of hyper-minimization are recalled.

scholarly journals Reversible parallel communicating finite automata systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-279
Author(s):  
Henning Bordihn ◽  
György Vaszil
Keyword(s):  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
The Other ◽  
Deterministic Case ◽  
Computational Power ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Context Free

AbstractWe study the concept of reversibility in connection with parallel communicating systems of finite automata (PCFA in short). We define the notion of reversibility in the case of PCFA (also covering the non-deterministic case) and discuss the relationship of the reversibility of the systems and the reversibility of its components. We show that a system can be reversible with non-reversible components, and the other way around, the reversibility of the components does not necessarily imply the reversibility of the system as a whole. We also investigate the computational power of deterministic centralized reversible PCFA. We show that these very simple types of PCFA (returning or non-returning) can recognize regular languages which cannot be accepted by reversible (deterministic) finite automata, and that they can even accept languages that are not context-free. We also separate the deterministic and non-deterministic variants in the case of systems with non-returning communication. We show that there are languages accepted by non-deterministic centralized PCFA, which cannot be recognized by any deterministic variant of the same type.

State Complexity of k-Union and k-Intersection for Prefix-Free Regular Languages

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 211-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hae-Sung Eom ◽  
Yo-Sub Han ◽  
Kai Salomaa
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Constant Factor ◽  
The State ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
State Complexity ◽  
Binary Alphabet ◽  
Multiple Intersections

We investigate the state complexity of multiple unions and of multiple intersections for prefix-free regular languages. Prefix-free deterministic finite automata have their own unique structural properties that are crucial for obtaining state complexity upper bounds that are improved from those for general regular languages. We present a tight lower bound construction for k-union using an alphabet of size k + 1 and for k-intersection using a binary alphabet. We prove that the state complexity upper bound for k-union cannot be reached by languages over an alphabet with less than k symbols. We also give a lower bound construction for k-union using a binary alphabet that is within a constant factor of the upper bound.

DESCRIPTIONAL COMPLEXITY OF NFA OF DIFFERENT AMBIGUITY

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (05) ◽  
pp. 975-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
HING LEUNG
Keyword(s):  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
The Other ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Descriptional Complexity ◽  
Nondeterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Initial States

In this paper, we study the tradeoffs in descriptional complexity of NFA (nondeterministic finite automata) of various amounts of ambiguity. We say that two classes of NFA are separated if one class can be exponentially more succinct in descriptional sizes than the other. New results are given for separating DFA (deterministic finite automata) from UFA (unambiguous finite automata), UFA from MDFA (DFA with multiple initial states) and UFA from FNA (finitely ambiguous NFA). We present a family of regular languages that we conjecture to be a good candidate for separating FNA from LNA (linearly ambiguous NFA).

Non-Self-Embedding Grammars, Constant-Height Pushdown Automata, and Limited Automata

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Bruno Guillon ◽  
Giovanni Pighizzini ◽  
Luca Prigioniero
Keyword(s):  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Polynomial Size ◽  
Constant Height ◽  
Double Exponential ◽  
Recursive Structures ◽  
Deterministic Formula ◽  
Context Free ◽  
Pushdown Automata

Non-self-embedding grammars are a restriction of context-free grammars which does not allow to describe recursive structures and, hence, which characterizes only the class of regular languages. A double exponential gap in size from non-self-embedding grammars to deterministic finite automata is known. The same size gap is also known from constant-height pushdown automata and [Formula: see text]-limited automata to deterministic finite automata. Constant-height pushdown automata and [Formula: see text]-limited automata are compared with non-self-embedding grammars. It is proved that non-self-embedding grammars and constant-height pushdown automata are polynomially related in size. Furthermore, a polynomial size simulation by [Formula: see text]-limited automata is presented. However, the converse transformation is proved to cost exponential. Finally, a different simulation shows that also the conversion of deterministic constant-height pushdown automata into deterministic [Formula: see text]-limited automata costs polynomial.

COMPLEXITY IN UNION-FREE REGULAR LANGUAGES

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (07) ◽  
pp. 1639-1653 ◽  
Author(s):  
GALINA JIRÁSKOVÁ ◽  
TOMÁŠ MASOPUST
Keyword(s):  
Free Path ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Regular Expressions ◽  
Deterministic Finite Automata ◽  
Union Operation

We continue the investigation of union-free regular languages that are described by regular expressions without the union operation. We also define deterministic union-free languages as languages accepted by one-cycle-free-path deterministic finite automata, and show that they are properly included in the class of union-free languages. We prove that (deterministic) union-freeness of languages does not accelerate regular operations, except for the reversal in the nondeterministic case.

Union-Freeness Revisited — Between Deterministic and Nondeterministic Union-Free Languages

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Benedek Nagy
Keyword(s):  
Normal Form ◽  
Regular Language ◽  
Regular Expression ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Finite Union ◽  
Regular Languages ◽  
Regular Expressions ◽  
Closure Properties ◽  
Language Class ◽  
Union Operation

Union-free expressions are regular expressions without using the union operation. Consequently, (nondeterministic) union-free languages are described by regular expressions using only concatenation and Kleene star. The language class is also characterised by a special class of finite automata: 1CFPAs have exactly one cycle-free accepting path from each of their states. Obviously such an automaton has exactly one accepting state. The deterministic counterpart of such class of automata defines the deterministic union-free (d-union-free, for short) languages. In this paper [Formula: see text]-free nondeterministic variants of 1CFPAs are used to define n-union-free languages. The defined language class is shown to be properly between the classes of (nondeterministic) union-free and d-union-free languages (in case of at least binary alphabet). In case of unary alphabet the class of n-union-free languages coincides with the class of union-free languages. Some properties of the new subregular class of languages are discussed, e.g., closure properties. On the other hand, a regular expression is in union normal form if it is a finite union of union-free expressions. It is well known that every regular expression can be written in union normal form, i.e., all regular languages can be described as finite unions of (nondeterministic) union-free languages. It is also known that the same fact does not hold for deterministic union-free languages, that is, there are regular languages that cannot be written as finite unions of d-union-free languages. As an important result here we show that every regular language can be defined by a finite union of n-union-free languages. This fact also allows to define n-union-complexity of regular languages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document