scholarly journals Identifying textual silence in scientific research articles. Recontextualizations of the field account in Geology

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (28) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dacia F. Dressen
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Discourse ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Research Article ◽  
Scientific Research Articles ◽  
Textual Silence ◽  
Published Research

Long neglected as a primary impetus of study, textual silences abound in such field disciplines as geology, where most field results seem to ‘disappear’ from the published research article. This paper first discusses the nature of textual silence and then proposes a typology of textual silences associated with written scientific discourse. Next, by examining the different disciplinary genres involved in the “recontextualizations” of a fieldwork study in geology, this study seeks to (1) identify textual silence in the various recontextualizations and (2) offer explanations for it.

scholarly journals On alternating pre-modified and post-modified nominals such as aspirin synthesis vs. synthesis of aspirin: Rhetorical and cognitive packing in English science writing

Fachsprache ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 24-46
Author(s):  
Christopher Gledhill ◽  
Mojca Pecman
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Discourse ◽  
Science Writing ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Grammatical Variation ◽  
Nominal Groups ◽  
Rhetorical Function ◽  
Scientific Research Articles

In this paper, we examine the alternation between pre-modified and post-modified nominals, such as aspirin synthesis as opposed to synthesis of aspirin. This type of alternation has been previously explained in terms of rhetorical function (whether the item is ‘given’ as opposed to ‘new’), and phraseology (whether the item is seen as a ‘packed’ lexicalised term, or an ‘unpacked’ expanded nominal). In this paper, we suggest that other factors may also be involved, and we examine four specific cases from two different varieties of scientific English (Scientific Research Articles vs. Science Forums). Here we investigate the underlying constraints that govern this alternation, and we try to establish whether there is a preference for writers to ‘unpack’ nominal groups early on in a text and then to ‘re-pack’ them later on. Overall, we suggest a number of parameters that may explain the choice of one structure over another. Finally, and more generally, we show that this grammatical variation is a particularly productive resource in English nominal groups, and as such contributes to the rhetorical and cognitive construction of scientific demonstration in particular and scientific discourse more generally.

scholarly journals KORUPSI DAN PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-165
Author(s):  
Amin Haqiqi ◽  
◽  
Husaeri Putra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Economic Freedom ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Scientific Research Articles ◽  
High Level ◽  
Positive Effect

This study analyzes corruption and economic growth. The method of analysis uses literature studies. This literature study was carried out by searching scientific research articles about corruption through Google Scholar and journals about corruption. After the identification of several articles, the results show different results about the effect of corruption on economic growth. From each journal shows Corruption has a negative effect on economic growth in Indonesia and those that have a positive effect. This shows several factors that underlie the influence of corruption on economic growth, namely due to cultural differences, policies, economic freedom and the rules of each region. The diversity of each region in Indonesia makes a different level of influence of corruption so that if a region has a high level of economic freedom and rules and bureaucracy that are not difficult, corruption has a positive effect on economic growth. In general, the effect of corruption on economic growth is negative, where the cleaner the region or region is from corruption, the more it will encourage the growth of the region.

Scientific Research Articles

2021 ◽  
pp. 195-219
Author(s):  
John Blake
Keyword(s):  
Community Of Practice ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Scientific Writing ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Common Language ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Internal Review ◽  
Publication Success ◽  
Scientific Research Articles ◽  
Research Institute

Error-free scientific research articles are more likely to be accepted for publication than those permeated with errors. This chapter identifies, describes, and explains how to avoid 22 common language errors. Scientists need to master the genre of scientific writing to conform to the generic expectations of the community of practice. Based on a systematic analysis of the pedagogic literature, five categories of errors were identified in scientific research articles namely accuracy, brevity, clarity, objectivity, and formality. To gain a more in-depth understanding of the errors, a corpus investigation of scientific articles was conducted. A corpus of 200 draft research articles submitted for internal review at a research institute with university status was compiled, annotated, and analyzed. This investigation showed empirically the types of errors within these categories that may impinge on publication success. In total, 22 specific types of language errors were identified. These errors are explained, and ways for overcoming each of them are described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document