scholarly journals The Clinical and Biomarker Association of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and its Spatial Heterogeneous Expression in Colorectal Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (23) ◽  
pp. 4325-4333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Li Wei ◽  
Qi-Nian Wu ◽  
Dong-liang Chen ◽  
Zhao-Lei Zeng ◽  
Jia-Bin Lu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-348
Author(s):  
Jin Won Kim

Immuno-oncological treatment approaches, particularly with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antiprogrammed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 antibody or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 antibody, have become the standard treatment for gastrointestinal cancers. However, gastrointestinal cancers show an overall modest tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nevertheless, subgroups such as tumors that are DNA mismatch repair-deficient or have high microsatellite instability particularly benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Even in the first-line setting for colorectal cancer, the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody, was superior to that of chemotherapy. Recently, a combination of atezolizumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibody, and bevacizumab was approved as the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, and was reported as superior to sorafenib. Nivolumab, an anti–PD-1 antibody that is added to chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for gastric cancer, resulted in longer survival compared with chemotherapy alone. Further studies are ongoing to investigate additional immune checkpoint inhibitors for other gastrointestinal cancers. This review aims to provide an overview of the results of clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancers, including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and biliary tract cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3568-3568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigehiro Koganemaru ◽  
Naoko Inoshita ◽  
Yuji Miura ◽  
Yudai Fukui ◽  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmeralda Celia Marginean ◽  
Barbara Melosky

Context.— Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the third most-common cancer in developed countries and is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Two recognized pathways contribute to CRC development: a more-common chromosomal instability pathway and, in 15% of cases, a deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) pathway. The MSI-H CRC can be associated with somatic or germline mutations. Microsatellite status has been recognized as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. Objectives.— To summarize the molecular pathways of CRC, with an emphasis on the MSI (mismatch repair) pathway; the recommended MSI testing algorithms and interpretation; and the prognostic and predictive role of MSI-H status in personalized treatment, including adjuvant chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Data Sources.— A PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) review was performed for articles pertaining to CRC, MSI and mismatch repair systems, molecular classification, immune response, programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand-1, and immunotherapy. Conclusions.— Although the TNM classification of malignant tumor stage remains the key determinant of CRC prognosis and treatment, there are considerable stage-independent, interindividual differences in clinical outcome and therapy response by patients. In addition, MSI-H status has an important role in CRC management and can be reliably detected by molecular and immunohistochemistry techniques and genetic testing. Efforts must be made to identify whether MSI-H CRC is germline or sporadic to ensure appropriate treatment, accurate prognosis, and risk assessment for relatives. Microsatellite status has been recognized as a good prognostic indicator and is predictive of a poor response to 5-fluorouracil–based chemotherapy and a good response to programmed death ligand-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in metastatic/refractory MSI-H CRC.


Nanoscale ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (35) ◽  
pp. 16738-16749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Li ◽  
Yang Du ◽  
Xiaolong Liang ◽  
Ting Sun ◽  
Huadan Xue ◽  
...  

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a major target for the treatment of colorectal cancers (CRCs), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is an attractive target for CRC immunotherapy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisha Wang ◽  
Fei Ren ◽  
Qifeng Wang ◽  
Lee Ann Baldridge ◽  
M. Francesca Monn ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmeralda Celia Marginean ◽  
Barbara Melosky

Context.— The world of oncology has changed dramatically in the past few years with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors and immunotherapy. The promising findings of a small, phase 2 clinical trial that led to the US Food and Drug Administration breakthrough designation and approval of the anti–programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) drug pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck, Kenilworth, New Jersey) to treat metastatic/refractory microsatellite instability–high colorectal cancer (CRC) has significantly boosted interest in immunomodulatory therapies in microsatellite instability–high CRC. Objectives.— To review the immune response to cancer and the role of immune checkpoints, focusing on the technical and interpretation challenges of PD-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) testing by pathologists and the clinical implications of the test and the therapeutic potential of treating CRC with checkpoint inhibitors. Data Sources.— A PubMed review was performed of articles pertaining to CRC, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair systems, molecular classification, immune response, PD-1/PD-L1, and immunotherapy. Conclusions.— Exciting success with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA4) checkpoint inhibitors has already been reported in melanoma and in lung and renal carcinomas. Recently, microsatellite instability–high CRCs, expressing PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry, regardless of the level of that PD-L1 expression, appeared to respond to checkpoint blockades with anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 agents, whereas microsatellite-stable tumors were much less responsive. With microsatellite instability routinely tested by most centers, studies that include larger cohorts are required to study the predictive role of PD-1/PD-L1 expression in microsatellite instability–high CRC, to assess which immunohistochemistry antibodies to use, to refine the scoring criteria, and to critically analyze the interpretation pitfalls.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisha Wang ◽  
Zebing Liu ◽  
Kurt W. Fisher ◽  
Fei Ren ◽  
Jiaojie Lv ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document